Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Identify the analysts and the policymakers
It is not possible for one individual to collate and possess all necessary information required to make good decisions regarding national security and foreign policy issues. Indeed, the higher up one goes up the hierarchy of policy making ladder, the more complicated it becomes. Therefore, senior policy officials rely on their juniors and others for information and proper processing of the same[footnoteRef:1]. In effect, in such countries as the US, it means that such senior officials cannot afford to ignore advice from the US intelligence fraternity. [1: Ford, Relations between Intelligence Analysts and Policymakers]
Unlike information, intelligence is a filtered form that is responsive to stated needs and specified policy requirements. The intelligence community members are experts charged with the responsibility to analyze relevant data. Information is converted to intelligence by linking it to specific issues of national security importance; hence infusing it with value. The intelligence bodies serve various clients including the president, the Security Council, law enforcers, officials in government departments, and military commanders[footnoteRef:2]. [2: Davis, Tensions in analyst-policymaker relations]
“Policy makers” is the name given to people who have contested electoral positions and won. They are the ones that set budgets and govern. They also order operations and make important decisions. Policy makers benefit from intelligence service[footnoteRef:3]. While intelligence is a crucial component of the policy making process, its application should be determined by the policy maker. [3: Lowenthal, The policymaker-intelligence relationship]
Why is this relationship so important?
Products of intelligence should be tailored to support better decision making and strategy creation. Hence, a good relationship between intelligence analysts and policy makers cannot be overemphasized. Policy makers must trust the analysts in deciding which information is redundant and which one is helpful in the national security pursuits. Corporation between the two groups is necessary for compliance and understanding. It is the role of analysts to instill trust and confidence in...
It is also important that policy makers and analysts, alike, express their requirements while keeping a keen eye on objectivity. They must not let their personal views interfere with the truth of the intelligence. [4: Gookins, The role of intelligence in policy making, 65-73]
Value is accorded to the information gathered by the intelligence analyst by linking it to national security issues. The products play an important role on the knowledge set needed to fulfill objectives at national level. They range from tactical aspects to strategic realms. Time frames are important factors in the categorization of intelligence. In intelligence circles, tactical data is regarded more urgent and crucial. Long term issues are addressed in strategic intelligence. They incorporate economic and political patterns and factors spreading over time[footnoteRef:5]. [5: LORNE, The Impact of the Information Revolution]
To maintain its relevance to the process of policy making, the intelligence community must generate expert input that the policy makers lack. In such an age of information accessibility by the wider public, analysts must add value to the information they share. Analysts add value by, among other things, establishing the credibility of the sources and giving the context. By doing so, analysts clarify information further[footnoteRef:6]. Apart from knowledge depth infused in conventional matters, an intelligence analyst delves beyond the political and even economic aspects and explores emerging issues that may not be conventional or traditional such as arms proliferation, crime and terrorism. The latter aspects are clear distinguishing points of the intelligence community in their analysis. [6: Ibid]
What are its flaws?
The available literature on intelligence shows that there are at least three key challenges with regard to the analytic purpose of intelligence. One of them has to do with the information age. The information age has broadened the body of information to be analyzed by the intelligence community; hence complicating analysis. The second challenge has to do with mindsets. Biased mindsets interfere with the generation and production of intelligence. The third…
Bibliography
Davis, Jack. Tensions in analyst-policymaker relations: Opinions, facts, and evidence. WASHINGTON DC: CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, 2003.
Ford, Christopher A. Relations between Intelligence Analysts and Policymakers: Lessons of Iraq. Washington DC: Center for the Study of Intelligence, 2009.
Gookins, Amanda J. "The role of intelligence in policy making." SAIS Review of International Affairs 28, no. 1, 2008: 65-73.
LORNE, Teitelbaum. The Impact of the Information Revolution on Policymakers’ Use of Intelligence Analysis. Washington DC: Georgetown University, 2011.
Lowenthal, Mark M. The policymaker-intelligence relationship. 2010.
Some of those are as follows: 1) Affect the environment; 2) Either save or expend energy; 3) Economically feasible or expensive to maintain, heat and cool. 4) Affect student learning; 5) Affect the health of students and teachers alike and 6) Affect the retention of teachers. (Olson and Carney, 2004) Criteria involved in the design, operation and maintenance of these 'sustainable' buildings are those as follows: Sustainable site planning and landscaping design that decrease the use
Intelligence Analyst - Policy Maker Relations Policymakers & Analysts To paraphrase Sherman Kent, the relationship between analysts and policymakers "does not fall naturally in place, but requires careful thought to set right and constant efforts to keep effective" (Strategic Intelligence for National World Policy, 1949, sited in Davis). It is the nature of that careful thought and constant effort that is the subject of this paper. Policymakers and analysts agree that "the quality
Foreign Policy of China (Beijing consensus) Structure of Chinese Foreign Policy The "Chinese Model" of Investment The "Beijing Consensus" as a Competing Framework Operational Views The U.S.-China (Beijing consensus) Trade Agreement and Beijing Consensus Trading with the Enemy Act Export Control Act. Mutual Defense Assistance Control Act Category B Category C The 1974 Trade Act. The Operational Consequences of Chinese Foreign Policy The World Views and China (Beijing consensus) Expatriates The Managerial Practices Self Sufficiency of China (Beijing consensus) China and western world: A comparison The China (Beijing
Some mergers and acquisitions (M&as) did not generate any goodwill because they were accounted for using the pooling-of-interests method. In 1969, Leonard M. Savoie (then Executive Vice President of the AICPA) stated that he expected the then-prevailing accounting pronouncement authority, the Accounting Principles Board (APB), to abolish the pooling of interests method. However, the death-knell for this accounting method was not sounded until 2001 with the issuance of SEAS
Franks (along with the Bush war cabinet, including Vice President Dick Chaney) "met repeatedly" to plan the attack on Iraq. It was groupthink through and through. At the same time Bush was saying publicly he was "pursuing a diplomatic solution" (Hamilton, 2004), "intensive war planning" was going on during the whole year 2002. It "created its own momentum" in the administration, Hamilton wrote. In Woodward's book, which was recognized as
' Indians across the political spectrum, especially the country's powerful nuclear weapons establishment, are critical of the NPT, arguing that it unfairly warps international hierarchies to the disadvantage of the non-nuclear-weapon states" (1998:15). In its efforts to balance the pressures from the international community with its own self-interests in formulating foreign policies, the position adopted by India has been starkly different than other countries. In this regard, Karp concludes that,