However, by exercising its own version of "religious freedom," the university is discriminating against a sector of society it should serve. This is not to say that the university and its personnel do not have the right to exercise whatever religious views appeal to them most. However, such religious freedom should not be exercised to the detriment of the religious freedoms of others. No person or entity has the right to impose his or her views on others, or to deny the rights of certain persons based on their own beliefs and cultural practices. Hence, while the university has the right of religious freedom, it should not allow this right to become a policy that discriminates against others. Religious freedom, like religion itself, should be a private choice. Bob Jones has made it a public one, and therefore does not serve its public. In this way, the institution does not serve its purpose as a learning environment for the benefit of the public. Instead, it benefits only that sector of the public that holds the same or similar beliefs to its own.

As mentioned, Bob Jones interprets Genesis 10 quite literally. The interpretation of human descendence has been interpreted in just this way by the general public up to the middle of the 19th century. Furthermore, such an interpretation implies two basic suppositions: that the Bible is a historically accurate document, and that the Old Testament and all its laws and regulations are still applicable to life today.

From the Christian, and indeed from the general human...

If Genesis 10 is accepted as the literal truth, all the other Old Testament laws should be accepted as valid as well, including the fact that girls should be banished for the duration of their period and that homosexuals should be killed. Surely this would cause considerable chaos in a democratic country.
Secondly, the acceptance of Genesis 10 as historical fact is unsound from an academic viewpoint. There is no scientific evidence to suggest the absolute and irrefutable truth of the flood, the ark, or the lineage of Noah's sons. Furthermore, it is not even known whether the flood in fact destroyed all creatures on the entire earth, or only those in the known world at the time. Considering the Biblical passage as absolute truth is therefore completely unfounded in scientific fact and invalid as a general policy at any academic institution.

Bob Jones, as an academic institution, should therefore recognize the fundamental fallacy of its thinking. As an academic institution it cannot constitute as fact those things that are not scientifically established as such. As a charitable organization it has no right to exclude any sector of society from its service.

In conclusion, while it is true that religious freedom provides the right to any faith of a person's choosing without interference ore discrimination, no institution or person has the right to in turn discriminate against others on the basis of the exercise of this right.