The silo argument is similar to the laboratory argument, but it focuses on the tangible things nature has to offer -- not just the knowledge of medicine that certain plants can provide, but the plants themselves that are used to make the medicine. This argument acknowledges that though nature can provide many material resources, these resources are limited, and if they are harvested and/or utilized in such a way that prevents their steady regeneration -- that is, in a way that disrupts or destroys the natural processes surrounding the given material, be it plant, mineral, or animal -- they will be lost. Much like the knowledge that would be lost in the laboratory argument, the adherents to the silo argument fear the loss of vital and potentially life-changing resources that are known and posited to exist in various wildernesses. Such a loss would be irreversible, because the commodities available in natural wilderness are very often impossible to produce artificially.
Another good selfish argument is the gymnasium argument. Nature provides sources for physical recreation unlike anything available artificially; to achieve the same sights, sounds, and smells of a wilderness hike, one must go on a wilderness hike. Climbing a rock wall at Yosemite simply cannot...
For some, this would be the weakest argument for nature preservation as it leads to no good outside of itself; for others this might make it the strongest argument. For still others, such as the great American thinker often credited with starting the Transcendentalist school, Ralph Waldo Emerson, all of these arguments are only partially correct, and they miss the major point completely.
Emerson saw nature not only as something "out there," but also as something inherent to ourselves. He believed that we had intimate knowledge of nature in our innocence, and that it was only the false layers of knowledge that were overlaid atop this innocence that made us believe we were somehow separate from nature. In this he echoed certain concepts found in Romantic poetry, specifically that of Wordsworth. Each of the above arguments addresses only a small part of the real problem -- that a destruction of nature is a denial and destruction of ourselves. Each of these arguments can be seen as simply a way of acknowledging our own -- and nature's -- usefulness. It is not that we are robbing ourselves of religious experience, or knowledge, or material goods, or even simply enjoyable exercise when we destroy nature -- at least, it is not only that -- but we are really not utilizing ourselves fully when this occurs. When the man-nature organism is functioning in harmony, such destruction would be literally unthinkable.
This refers to the National Petroleum Reserve of Alaska (NPR-a), which is situated between the foothills of the Brooks Range and the Arctic coastline, and is about 120 miles from the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) (Rosen, 2003). The Bureau of Land Management ( BLM) estimates the area will"… supplement production from the Alpine fields, which hold 429 million barrels and have a daily oil output of about 100,000
" (Carson, 2) That the correlation between these collected symptoms and the use of pesticides in our predominantly agricultural towns had yet to be recognized at this point in history is important to consider. Though today it still receives troublingly little acknowledgment, the exponential rise in the consumption of organic produce in recent years is indicative of a graduating cognizance of that which Carson's work brought to the forefront of
Environmental Ethics & United States Government Environmental Ethics and United States [Type the document title] Definition of Environment Ethics & Its Approaches United States & Environmental Ethics Role of United States Government Environment Protection Agency Department of Interior's Bureau of Land Management (BLM) National Park Service (NPS) United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Role of Civil Society in Environment Protection & Preservation Environment protection and preservation has been a serious concern for countries all across the globe. But the government of
Also, careless people with guns shot the condors at will; and when ranchers put out poison to kill wolves and grizzly bears the condors then fed on those carcasses and were poisoned as well. In 1937 the U.S. Congress set aside a refuge for the condors in Santa Barbara County and in Ventura County in 1947, trying to protect these great birds, Peeters explains (p. 114). By 1987, there were
Environmental ethics in "Ishmael" by Daniel Quinn This paper looks at the book Ishmael by Daniel Quinn and how the environmental ethics as outlined by Quinn relate to the world and man today. How man by looking at the damage he has carried out in the name of progress and listening to his neighbors and their roles can help to halt and possibly heal the earth before its destruction is complete. Ishmael:
In fact, when looking at the records of the environmental fights and debates that have been fought in the past, it is no surprise to see the aspect of animal suffering and extinction being given its due attention. It is also interesting to note that fights fought by the environmentalist and animal rights activist before the World War II took place were all based on the selfish and ruthless