Kant Morals Kant focused on presenting the idea of good as being a concept that should not be defined by relating to a series of attitudes and behaviors that some communities are likely to identify as good. Instead, he attempted to show morality in its entirety as the only good thing and as being strongly related to good will. Even with the fact that he emphasizes occasions in which people can put across helpful attitudes toward others on account of their personal interests, he also related to how someone can actually behave morally without expecting something in return. This is, from Kant's perspective a good example of a person considering that it is his or her sense of duty that fuels them rather than the feeling that they are going to profit from the enterprise.

An individual who behaves morally practically abandons all desires in order to experience a type of happiness that is based on his or her interest in assisting others because they are happy rather than because this happiness serves him in any way. This is a form of selfless happiness and is a paradox when considering ideas in the contemporary society, as most people appear to believe that having material interests is an essential element of human nature and behavior.

A sense of duty toward...

While there are a series of episodes during which a person can appear to be interested in doing good, people are often guided by their selfishness when helping others. The simple idea of helping an individual is often owed to the person helping being interested in the benefits associated with helping the first individual. It would thus be safe to say that a sense of duty would imply a unique form of being good -- in such a setting the person who is good puts across such behaviors because he is well-acquainted with the reasons why he or she should do this, knows the risks and detriments associated with the action, and is nonetheless determined to go through with it.
A person who feels that he or she has a duty to behave morally is likely to qualify as one who actually behaves morally and who fails to be catalogued as a normal person who only acts on account of the profits he or she gets as a result. Furthermore, the individual who performs moral actions does not do so because he considers the eventual benefits that he or the person involved in going to get from the enterprise. Instead, he or she wants to be moral because he or she feels that this is perfectly normal and should have nothing to do with the profits these concepts involve for them or for the person(s) that they want to help, thus meaning that selflessness is the key to putting across moral behavior.

Even with the fact that Kant emphasizes the idea of duty as a superior state of being, he also relates to how it can directly act in disagreement with moral thinking. By considering that it would be his or her duty to behave morally, a person directly acknowledges that he or she should ignore a series of intriguing opportunities in the process.…