Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
However, Lincoln would not budge. It would have certainly been the politically expedient thing to do for Lincoln to surrender and make a compromise that would result in the preservation of the union on the South's terms. Lincoln did not want to preserve the union at the expense of its moral integrity, though. For Lincoln, the emancipation of the slaves was integral to the creation of a "more perfect union." Referring to the tremendous loss of life that the Civil War caused, Lincoln (1863) stated in the Gettysburg Address, "It is for us the living rather to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced." The soldiers who fought in the Civil War would have died in vain if Lincoln had not persisted in accomplishing the dual goal of preserving the union and eliminating slavery.
Because he was willing and able to do what was right in terms of moral and constitutional law, Abraham Lincoln was a superior leader. He remained stalwart in his commitment to the constitutional values of freedom, and he even offered the world "a new birth of freedom," with the emancipation of the slaves. What Lincoln understood was that the nation founded on principles like "liberty and justice for all" could not stand divided on an issue as morally contentious as slavery. Lincoln also understood that slavery was not compatible with the Constitution, which is why the Civil...
Lincoln could have allowed the South simply to cede, which would have cost fewer lives on the battlefield. Instead, Lincoln pursued the path of righteousness that saved the lives of countless African-Americans, paving the way for a new and more just nation.
Abraham Lincoln was one of the greatest presidents of the United States, and was also one of the country's foremost leaders and role models. Books like Phillips' Lincoln on Leadership and Goodwin's (2005) Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln show that Lincoln has gone beyond a mere historical figure and has entered the public consciousness as an emblem of freedom and justice. Lincoln's actions as president highlight the means by which a humble person can rise up and do great things. Historians will continue to discuss Lincoln's leadership style, which can also be applied to leadership models in the corporate sector. All organizations have a political dimension to them, which is why it is possible to learn from the exemplary leadership qualities of Abraham Lincoln.
References
Goodwin, D.K. (2005). Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Lincoln, a. (1863). Gettysburg address. Retrieved online: http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/gettyb.asp
Moreton, C.L. (2008). 10 Qualities that Made Abraham Lincoln a Great Leader. HRBLR. Retrieved online: http://hr.blr.com/whitepapers/Staffing-Training/Leadership/10-Qualities-that-Made-Abraham-Lincoln-a-Great-Lea
Phillips, D.T. (1992). Lincoln on Leadership. New York: Warner.
Smith, S.B. (2013). What sort of leader was Lincoln? The New York Times. Feb 13, 2013. Retrieved online: http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/02/13/what-sort-of-leader-was-lincoln/
Civil War of Northern Aggression Is the Term Accurate? The Civil war has been one of the most controversial topics in the history of United States. Where it has been given many names like War Between the States, the War of the Rebellion and the War for Southern Independence, one of its most controversial names is the War of Northern Aggression. There is an enormous amount of literature written on the subject
Civil War represents a decisive period in American history, but also one of violence, during which more than 620,000 Americans died. (Gary B. Nash, Carter Smith, page 144) The American Civil War was fought between North and the South, and started as a result of their differences regarding slavery, state's rights and federal authority. The decisive moment was when Republican candidate Abraham Lincoln won the election, and become the president
Civil War In a long war, all of the economic, financial and population advantages would favor the North since the South was a mostly agrarian region that imported its manufactured goods. Initially, both sides had expected that the war would be short and decisive, although by 1862 it was clear that it might drag on indefinitely. Jefferson Davis, Robert E. Lee and the other Southern leaders realized that their best chance
Civil War Would the union still have won the civil war if the Border States separated? The union would have still won if the Border States separated. During the Civil War the Border States, Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky, and Missouri, were not critical to the unions victory over the confederates. Unfortunately, our modern society has been marred with war and strife over its eventful lifespan. A civil disagreement, when accompanied by mass offenses, often
The war and the years that preceded it led to the creation of social classes in our country. These classes consisted of the rich upper-class down to the poor immigrants; and each class had its own rules and regulations by which it lived. To this day, a large part of our society is based on classes. Socially, the war divided races and started what would lead to racism, bigotry, and
Robert E. Lee was also an important general responsible for commanding the Northern Virginia regiment of the confederate army. Lee was interesting in that even though he was a confederate commander he was believed be against slavery. Lincoln's beliefs about America are forever engrained on the national psyche. Speeches such as the Gettysburg Address are still quoted and reflects the intent of the founding fathers. The Gettysburg Address states, "Four