In conclusion, Wu's arguments are much more convincing than those by Yoo. Wu holds that Network Neutrality is essential for the benefits of its free market platform to continue, especially in the light of end user benefit. Innovation and competition can only be optimized if the market is open to as many as possible new entrants. The removal of Network Neutrality would dramatically reduce the ability of companies to enter the market and of existing companies to optimize their competition. End users would not have as many choices when it comes to the products available, while the lack of competition would also drive prices higher.

Network Neutrality is a platform that provides users with optimal choices and competitors with more capability of competition. This is one of the fundamental principles of a

Removing this in favor of a system that has the potential to create a monopoly of the market by only the largest corporations would surely be a step back from the current free market. I am therefore in agreement with Wu, who holds that Network Neutrality is essential for the continuity of user benefits when it comes to the Internet. Removing this would be nothing short of violating the rights of choice enjoyed by end users.
References

Cyber Telecom. (2012). Net Neutrality. Retrieved from: http://www.cybertelecom.org/ci/neutral.htm

Free Press (2012). Network Neutrality. Retrieved from: http://www.freepress.net/policy/internet/net_neutrality

Keepin the Internet Neutral?: Time Wu and Christopher Yoo Debate. Federal Communications Law Journal, Vol. 59, No. 3.

The New York Times (2010, Dec. 22). Net Neutrality. Retrieved from: http://topics.nytimes.com/topics/reference/timestopics/subjects/n/net_neutrality/index.html

Public Knowledge. (2012). Key Issues: Network Neutrality. Retrieved from: http://www.publicknowledge.org/issues/network-neutrality