Personal Team Relationships There Is A Difference Essay

PAGES
2
WORDS
583
Cite

Personal Team Relationships There is a difference between team-building and teamwork. The first focuses most on building the group and the second on the processes and functions that make groups successful (Ingram, David, 2011)

In many business settings we often focus on the first and then assume the working together will come naturally. We often assume that having others around is enough to ensure that person interests or agendas don't predominate. But what happens when we cannot focus on the team itself or the building of that team? Then we have to focus on how people work together, including on interpersonal relationships that really determine if the decision-making processes function as we want.

One of the key issues of two people working productively always centers on listening and mutually understanding what each wants, what each hears and what each expects will result....

...

This is how groups or individuals can make progress and get to the point where plans can be made and the details for moving forward can be identified. Goals and objectives are important in team settings but they still need to be understood by the individuals who do the actions necessary to get to those outcomes. This level of results orientation through mutual understanding and communication underlies what happens between individuals just as it does the dynamics of a healthy and productive group process, which is what team-building and growing is all about.
Here is one example of this. Two people were fighting once in a group that was trying to outline our business goals and the steps to get started. The two people just couldn't communicate and seemed to be talking past each other. They were nearly fighting, which hurt the environment for our team. So I tried something to get them…

Sources Used in Documents:

REFERENCES:

Ingram, David (2011), What is the difference between team building & team work, The Houston Chronicle, retrieved October 6, 2011 from http://smallbusiness.chron.com/difference-between-team-building-teamwork-10981.html, para 4.

1

Building Relationships Outside the Team


Cite this Document:

"Personal Team Relationships There Is A Difference" (2011, October 06) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/personal-team-relationships-there-is-a-difference-84989

"Personal Team Relationships There Is A Difference" 06 October 2011. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/personal-team-relationships-there-is-a-difference-84989>

"Personal Team Relationships There Is A Difference", 06 October 2011, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/personal-team-relationships-there-is-a-difference-84989

Related Documents

Team Leadership Issue: Managing Diversity Team Diversity Jackson in his article claims team diversity is the even distribution of personnel attributes among interdependent members of a work unit (Jackson, 2003). The attributes encompass a wide range of issues ranging from gender, culture, and ethnicity, inclusive of skills, experiences, and education obtained by the team members. The diverse traits of the team members can either build or break the entire team in attaining

Team and Tension The major components of House's Path-Goal Theory are directive leaderships, supportive leadership, participative leadership, and achievement-oriented leadership. Each leadership style has its own unique attributes which correlate directly to an individual's personality traits. For instance, directive leaders tend to have a more authoritarian approach to leadership. They tend to establish working hierarchies of relationships and reporting structures. Directive leaders also tend to operate as a single leader with

As a member of the college community, my plan for personal responsibility is to always comply with formal rules and codes of conduct and be sensitive to the rights and welfare of others and to act in ways that respect those rights even when it might be more convenient for me not to. Conclusion Personal responsibility means recognizing obligations and meeting all of the burdens of those obligations. Circumstances calling for

Team Organization Models for team behavior within the organization Teams have become an increasingly ubiquitous part of complex, modern organizations. One survey of 962 HR leaders found that fifty-four percent of respondents spent up to 30% of their day in team settings (Blanchard 2012). No longer are individual employees solely appraised in terms of their individual usefulness: their ability to function as part of a team is essential. "Organizations are more networked,

Recognizing the Significance Effective Interpersonal Communication I have also learned that many types of interpersonal conflict in the workplace begin as little more than ineffective communications and misinterpretations by one or more individuals. The email communications medium has demonstrated itself to be particularly vulnerable to unintended tones or to unintended interpretations or assumptions. For that reason, I may sometimes review email exchanges. In our organization, the privacy policy is that supervisors

Team Motivation Team Dynamics The team on which the paper is based is a class discussion team that was formed in the curse of the semester to enable us accomplish the various tasks that would be assigned. Stages of team development Our group went through the various stages of development like any other groups with the challenges and the progress handled by the member of the group. The following is a summary of the