Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Death of Kitty Genovese in 1964 was a gruesome and prolonged affair. Not only was Genovese stabbed to death; her killer Winston Mosley first stopped half-way in the midst of the murder, allowing his victim to temporarily try to seek out a safe haven. He was able to finish his attack on her with a fatal blow because none of the onlookers called the police. Although the onlookers gave many poor excuses, ultimately their behavior seemed to be attributed to the fact that crimes occurring at a distance often elicit less compassion than those occurring right before the viewer. The phenomenon became known as the "bystander effect" (Mcfadden). The bystander effect is the assumption that there is less of a sense of guilt and moral responsibility when individuals are part of a crowd. People believe that other people will act instead and so they do nothing. This psychological term was first developed based upon the horror generated by the Genovese murder (Mcfadden). However, it gained its notoriety because, according to the original article, the number of the respondents claimed that they did not call the police because they were frightened (Gansberg). This seemed like a peculiar defense given that the observers were safely behind locked doors, in their homes, near phones, and the killer had no way of determining who was calling the police or not. In fact, one man named Robert Mozer did shout out to leave the girl alone. This seems in retrospect both ineffectual and risky given that the killer was simply then made aware of the fact that people were watching him and could take steps to conceal his actions. Mozer did not call the police and Mosley resumed the attack. Other excuses given by the bystanders, as well as their fear, was their assumption that it was a lover's quarrel (although even if it was, this does not make it any less deadly).
When the perpetrator of the crime, passed away in 2016, the New York Times ran yet another article on the murder, this time with a more balanced depiction of the crime. It noted that the reported thirty-eight witnesses was something of an exaggeration and many of the witnesses did not see the crime as it unfolded before their eyes. According to Mosley's account, during his first attempt to attack Genovese, he…
Works Cited
Gansberg, Martin. "37 who saw murder didn't call police." The New York Times.
27 Mar 1964. 4 Apr 2016. Web. 15 Sept 2016.
McFadden, Robert. "Walter Mosely, who killed Kitty Genovese, dies in prison at 81."
The New York Times. 4 Apr 2016. Web. 15 Sept 2016.
Bystander Apathy The term bystander effect is often referred in relation to a situation where a greater number of people are present, observing a person in distress, yet they will be just watching him suffer rather than help the person out of prevent the situation. This is basic psychological reaction, people are more likely to help a person in distress or take action against a situation if there are no witnesses
What all this shows is that "there is something about a crowd of bystanders that inhibits helping behavior" (101). The results of Latane and Darley's research were shocking. Why do some people act in altruistic or pro-social ways while others do not? To act altruistically means to work in a way that goes beyond our selves, our own egos, and work for the benefit of someone else. A true act
Social Psychology Prosocial behavior, as the name suggests, is behavior that is ultimately beneficial to others. Any act that is carried out with an end to helping someone else instead of oneself is prosocial behavior. If the behavior involves no gain to the individual, and in fact, may involve a personal cost, this behavior is considered altruistic. There is some debate over whether true altruism exists, or if even seemingly unselfish
No matter which side of this debate that you find yourself on, there is one thing for sure the interpretation will always be up to whoever is reading it at the time. The same can be said about which side of the gun control argument that you find yourself on; it is truly a matter of who you are talking to at the moment. Both Thompson and Desuka have made
Booker Prize-winning novel Amsterdam by Ian Mcewan is not really about euthanasia per se; it is about the twisted relationships between the two main characters, Clive Linley, composer, and Vernon Halliday, newspaper editor. Deeply affected by the death of their mutual friend and lover Molly Lane, Clive and Vernon agree that if they should ever exhibit the symptoms of some deadly illness, that they agree to assist the other in
"The Envelope. In your mail, there's something from UNICEF. After reading it through you correctly believe that, unless you soon send in a check for $100, then, instead of each living many more years, over thirty more children will die soon" (Unger, 1996:9, cited by Gordon, 1998). But people throw the UNICEF envelope out and buy a new pair of shoes instead. Evolutionary theory states that the altruistic impulse has