Academic Performance of Students With Mental Retardation
This paper presents a critical review of Yu, Newman, and Wagner's (2009) study on the secondary school experiences and academic performance of students with mental retardation. The review summarizes the study's research questions, subjects, procedures, and findings, including course-taking patterns across general and special education settings, the influence of functional ability levels on academic enrollment, and overall grade outcomes. The paper also evaluates methodological strengths and limitations, such as the reliance on secondary data, the absence of demographic variables like gender and socioeconomic status, and the use of adult-reported assessments. Suggestions for improving future research design are offered, including primary data collection and qualitative methods.
- Introduction and Research Questions: Policy context and study's three core research questions
- Subjects and Sample Characteristics: Ages, functionality levels, and school settings of participants
- Research Procedures and Data Collection: NLTS2 data, teacher surveys, parental assessment, and WJ III testing
- Results and Key Findings: Course-taking patterns, setting differences, and grade outcomes
- Critical Evaluation and Methodological Considerations: Strengths, limitations, and suggested design improvements
- Conclusions and Implications for Practice: Recommendations for inclusive classrooms and future research
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper balances summary and critique, accurately reporting the study's findings before offering a measured evaluation of its methodological strengths and weaknesses.
- The critique is grounded in specific, actionable suggestions — such as incorporating gender and socioeconomic variables, collecting primary data, and exploring qualitative designs — which demonstrate genuine engagement with research methodology.
- The writer connects the study's findings to real classroom practice, noting how the results will inform their own teaching sensitivity toward students with disabilities.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates critical article review technique: the writer does not merely summarize the source study but systematically interrogates its design choices, including sampling limitations, assessment validity, and data source selection. By referencing methodological texts (Creswell, 1994; Strauss & Corbin, 1990; Nardi, 2006), the writer situates the critique within an established research-methods framework rather than relying on personal opinion alone.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a conventional article-review structure: it opens with the study's theoretical and policy context, describes the subjects and procedures, presents the main findings, and then moves into a two-part critical evaluation covering both methodological concerns and broader implications. The conclusion ties findings back to practice, a move that strengthens the paper's applied relevance and gives the review a clear sense of purpose beyond mere academic exercise.
Introduction and Research Questions
Legislative support for students with mental retardation ensures that these students have a place within the school system. The access this support provides allows students to pursue more educational options than were previously available to them. It therefore becomes critical that the outcomes resulting from this increased access be examined empirically to determine whether students are benefitting from the best available care. A companion issue raised by greater access to education is whether that access should exist in a specialized environment or within the general school population. While there has been research on this question, the results are not entirely conclusive. Additionally, the question of whether the educational environment influences the delivery and reception of the curriculum must be explored as part of an integrated analysis.
To address these concerns adequately, the following research questions were examined (Kaplan, 1963). First, what courses do students with mental disabilities study? Second, what are the physical and other characteristics of the classroom, and how do these characteristics influence the outcomes of the learning process? Finally, the major consideration is what are the actual academic outcomes of students with learning disabilities? This final question provides the essential basis for examining the success of policy implementation. It also allows researchers to compare the usefulness of different educational environments based on the level of student outcomes.
Subjects and Sample Characteristics
The subjects for this study were between the ages of 14 and 18 at the time of the study. The degree of mental retardation was determined using a parent-reported assessment of the child across four categories of cognitive functionality: reading common signs, telling the time on an analog clock, counting change, and looking up numbers in a telephone directory (Yu, Newman, & Wagner, 2009). These areas were measured using a combined scale where the lowest value would be 4 and the highest 16 for a child who was fully functional in all areas.
Ninety-four percent of the subjects attended regular schools serving a multiplicity of student types. Four percent attended schools specially designed for students with disabilities, and the remaining 2% attended charter, hospital, or other schools of that nature. Unfortunately, the researchers did not provide information on the demographic characteristics of the sample; the analysis was focused primarily on answering the research questions posed by the study.
References
Yu, J., Newman, L., & Wagner, M. (2009). Secondary school experiences and academic performance of students with mental retardation. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Special Education Research.
Kaplan, A. (1963). The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science. Harper and Row.
Nardi, P. M. (2006). Doing survey research: A guide to quantitative methods. Pearson Publishing.
Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage Publications.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.