ADHD Classroom Best Practices: Instruction and Management
This paper outlines a best-practices plan for teaching students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in a school setting. Drawing on research by Pfiffner, Barkley, and DuPaul, as well as Mautone, DuPaul, and Jitendra, the paper examines proactive and reactive behavioral management strategies designed to reduce stress and reinforce positive behavior. It also discusses computer-assisted instruction (CAI) as an engaging, individualized learning tool for ADHD students, and reviews both formal and informal assessment methods suited to this population. The paper concludes by emphasizing the importance of emotional support and a low-stress learning environment in improving outcomes for students with ADHD.
- Introduction: ADHD defined; proactive/reactive framework introduced
- Proactive and Reactive Management Strategies: Strategies to reduce stress and reinforce behavior
- Computer-Assisted Instruction for ADHD Learners: CAI as engaging, individualized tool for ADHD
- Assessment Methods for Students with ADHD: Formal and informal assessment approaches reviewed
- Conclusion: Synthesis of strategies and emotional support emphasis
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds every recommendation in peer-reviewed research, citing Pfiffner et al. and Mautone et al. with specific page numbers, giving the argument credibility.
- Maintains a clear organizational logic by distinguishing proactive from reactive strategies before moving to instructional tools and assessment, making the plan easy for a practitioner to follow.
- Balances behavioral management with emotional support, showing awareness that ADHD is not simply a discipline problem but a neurological condition requiring empathy alongside structure.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper models evidence-based argumentation in applied education writing: each recommendation is tied directly to a cited source, and the cited finding is then translated into a concrete classroom example (e.g., rewarding a target behavior with a book or sticker). This source-to-application pattern is the core technique of special education policy writing and gives the paper practical as well as academic value.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief introduction that frames ADHD as a learning disability and establishes the proactive/reactive framework. Two body paragraphs address classroom management strategies, followed by a focused section on computer-assisted instruction and a shorter section on assessment. The conclusion synthesizes all recommendations and closes with a humanizing reminder about the emotional experience of students with ADHD. Total length is appropriate for a focused undergraduate position paper.
Introduction
For a student with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), a teacher's plan for best practices should include behavioral and cognitive approaches that target the learner's IEP goals and help ensure a positive classroom experience. Students with ADHD are identified as learning disabled because of "deficits in the acquisition of specific academic skills" in their overall ability to learn in traditional ways (Clarfield & Stoner, 2005, p. 246). To help these students overcome the challenges associated with their learning disorder, Pfiffner, Barkley, and DuPaul (2006) point out that teachers should consider alternative approaches to instruction—namely, "school-based interventions should include both proactive and reactive strategies to maximize behavior change" (p. 547). Thus, the plan for best practices should be focused on employing proactive and reactive strategies to facilitate the student's acquisition of knowledge and maintain discipline and effective classroom management (Pfiffner et al., 2006). This paper discusses these management techniques along with appropriate instructional techniques that can be implemented to assist the ADHD learner, and examines how teachers can provide emotional support and use effective assessments.
References
Clarfield, J., & Stoner, G. (2005). The effects of computerized reading instruction on the academic performance of students identified with ADHD. School Psychology Review, 34(2), 246.
Mautone, J. A., DuPaul, G. J., & Jitendra, A. K. (2005). The effects of computer-assisted instruction on the mathematics performance and classroom behavior of children with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 9(1), 301–312.
Pfiffner, L. J., Barkley, R. A., & DuPaul, G. J. (2006). Treatment of ADHD in school settings. Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment, 3, 547–589.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.