Biblical Worldview: Two Secular Views of Humanity Compared
This paper examines the biblical worldview of humanity in relation to two prominent secular theories: the view of man as an animal, rooted in Darwinian evolution and Pavlovian behaviorism, and the view of man as a pawn of the universe, associated with nihilist and existentialist philosophers such as Nietzsche and Camus. The paper identifies key thinkers behind each theory, outlines the biblical foundation that human beings are made in God's image and given dominion over creation, and compares each secular theory against Scripture. It concludes that while secular theories capture partial truths about human nature—such as sinful instincts or limited free will—the biblical account provides a more complete and purposeful understanding of humanity.
- Introduction and Overview: Sets up the paper's comparative framework
- Alternative Theories of Humanity: Presents evolutionary and nihilistic secular theories
- Major Thinkers and Their Schools of Thought: Profiles Darwin, Pavlov, Nietzsche, and Camus
- The Biblical View of Humanity: Grounds human dignity in the image of God
- Comparing and Contrasting the Theories: Measures each secular theory against Scripture
- Conclusion: Affirms biblical account as most complete view
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper uses a clear compare-and-contrast structure, systematically presenting each secular theory before measuring it against Scripture, which makes the argument easy to follow.
- It balances critique with nuance: rather than dismissing the secular theories entirely, the paper acknowledges where they partially align with biblical teaching (e.g., animal instincts and sin, limited free will).
- Direct quotations from both Scripture and an academic theology text anchor the argument in recognized sources, giving the paper credibility appropriate to its level.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the technique of dialectical analysis — presenting opposing viewpoints before synthesizing them against a primary framework (Scripture). Each theory is first explained on its own terms, then evaluated for where it conflicts with and where it inadvertently supports the biblical worldview. This approach avoids a simplistic rebuttal and instead models critical engagement with ideas.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized into five functional sections: a brief introduction, a presentation of two secular theories with their key thinkers, an exposition of the biblical doctrine of humanity grounded in Genesis, a point-by-point comparison of both theories against Scripture, and a conclusion that synthesizes the main argument. The numbered sub-points within sections mirror a theological outline format commonly used in Christian doctrine coursework.
Introduction and Overview
Human beings have long sought to understand their own nature, origin, and purpose. This paper examines two prominent secular theories of humanity — the view of man as an animal and the view of man as a pawn of the universe — and compares each against the biblical worldview.
Alternative Theories of Humanity
First Theory: Man as an Animal
The theory of man as animal gained prominence in the nineteenth century when Charles Darwin published his theory of evolution. From this perspective, a human being is nothing more than an advanced primate. The theory gained renewed attention at the beginning of the twentieth century, when psychologists like Ivan Pavlov adopted a materialistic and deterministic approach to studying human behavior. Drawing on his famous experiments with dogs salivating at the sound of a bell, Pavlov suggested that human beings are equally animalistic in their responses to stimuli.
Second Theory: Man as a Pawn of the Universe
A second secular theory holds that human beings have no meaningful control over their own destiny and are merely subject to the indifferent forces of the universe. This view is associated with nihilist and existentialist philosophers who regarded human life as ultimately without inherent purpose or divine guidance.
Major Thinkers and Their Schools of Thought
The two most important thinkers in the "man as an animal" tradition are Charles Darwin and Ivan Pavlov. Darwin proposed, for the first time in history, that human beings evolved from primates — a view that has been used to challenge the biblical creation narrative. Pavlov extended this framework into psychology through classical conditioning, focusing exclusively on the lower instincts of human beings. In doing so, these thinkers presented a limited view of humanity that did not account for spiritual dimensions of human existence.
Nihilistic philosophers like Nietzsche and existentialists like Camus posited that "man is a pawn of the universe." This pessimistic view presents human beings as having no control over their own destiny, much like the mythological figure of Sisyphus condemned to roll a boulder up a hill for eternity (Erickson 3).
The Biblical View of Humanity
Biblical Foundation of the Doctrine of Humanity
According to Scripture, human beings were created in God's image. This foundational truth is established in the very first book of the Bible: "God said, 'Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals'" (Genesis 1:26). God not only created mankind but also endowed human beings and their civilizations with purpose. That purpose — to "rule" or exercise dominion over the earth — demonstrates that God intended human beings to occupy a special and elevated role in creation. Human beings are ultimately beholden to God because of this divinely appointed purpose.
Theological Summary of the Doctrine of Humanity
The doctrine of the image of God (imago Dei) forms the cornerstone of the Christian understanding of humanity. It affirms that human beings possess inherent dignity, moral responsibility, and a capacity for relationship with God that no other creature shares. This sets humanity apart from all other created beings and gives human life its ultimate meaning and worth.
Conclusion
Throughout human history, people have sought answers about their origin and place in the world. The belief that man is an animal became popular when Darwin published On the Origin of the Species, though the impulse to identify closely with the natural world likely predates modern science. As tempting as it may be to focus on the similarities between human beings and animals, the Bible demonstrates that those similarities are superficial. Human beings hold a special place in creation because they alone are made in God's image.
Similarly, because human life is filled with suffering, it can be tempting to conclude that people are merely pawns of the universe. But a loving God does not use people as pawns. On the contrary, God granted human beings free will. It is free will that sometimes leads to sin — but that, too, is part of God's redemptive plan for humanity.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.