BlackBerry's Product Lifecycle Failure and Marketing Strategy
This paper analyzes the decline of Research in Motion (RIM), now BlackBerry Limited, through the lens of product lifecycle theory. Once the world's largest smartphone manufacturer, RIM lost its dominant market position due to a failure to innovate and adapt to changing consumer needs at the maturity stage of its product lifecycle. The paper outlines the four stages of the product lifecycle and their marketing implications, examines RIM's business problem in detail, critiques its current enterprise-focused marketing strategy, and recommends a revamped approach. Specific recommendations include increased investment in R&D, product diversification, competitive pricing in emerging markets, an expanded distribution network, and a broad-based marketing campaign emphasizing product differentiation.
- Introduction to Product Lifecycle Theory: Four lifecycle stages and their marketing implications
- RIM's Business Problem: RIM's rise, peak, and failure to innovate
- Current Marketing Strategy: RIM's current enterprise-focused market positioning
- Recommended Marketing Strategy: Revamped marketing mix to regain competitiveness
- Specific Strategic Action Recommendations: R&D, advertising campaigns, and distribution expansion
- Conclusion: Lessons from RIM's product lifecycle mismanagement
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds the business case study in established academic theory — the product lifecycle framework — before applying it to RIM, giving the analysis a clear conceptual foundation.
- Moves logically from problem diagnosis (failure to innovate at maturity) to strategic prescription (R&D investment, pricing, distribution), making the argument easy to follow.
- Uses specific, verifiable details — subscriber counts, revenue figures, product launch dates — to substantiate claims rather than relying on vague assertions.
- Addresses all four elements of the marketing mix (product, price, place, promotion) in its recommendations, demonstrating a comprehensive strategic perspective.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied theory analysis: it introduces a recognized academic framework (product lifecycle theory from Gorchels, 2006), explains each stage and its marketing implications, and then systematically maps RIM's real-world trajectory onto that framework. This technique — theory first, application second — is a hallmark of business case study writing and helps justify recommendations by connecting them back to established principles.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a theoretical overview of the product lifecycle and its marketing implications. It then shifts to the business problem, detailing RIM's rise and fall with supporting evidence. A brief description of RIM's current enterprise-focused strategy follows, setting up a recommended strategy section that addresses product, pricing, and target market. The paper closes with three concrete, actionable recommendations covering R&D, promotional campaigns, and distribution expansion.
Introduction to Product Lifecycle Theory
RIM, currently known as BlackBerry Limited, was at one time the most valuable company in Canada and the largest smartphone manufacturer worldwide (Friend, 2013). Today, however, the company struggles to remain viable, with revenues, subscribers, and profitability declining consistently since 2013. The fall of RIM can largely be attributed to poor product lifecycle management. This paper describes this problem in more detail and provides recommendations for addressing it.
Product lifecycle theory demonstrates that a product generally passes through four stages: introduction, growth, maturity, and decline (Gorchels, 2006). The first stage, introduction, involves launching the product to the market. At this stage, there is little or no competition, giving the company an important competitive advantage in the marketplace. Nonetheless, costs tend to be high as the company must develop the market for the product, and high costs often mean little or no profitability.
At the second stage, growth is experienced. Sales increase rapidly, costs fall due to economies of scale, profitability increases, awareness of the product grows, and market share expands substantially. Nonetheless, competition increases, potentially resulting in reduced prices. The third stage, maturity, is characterized by further cost reduction, market saturation (the sales peak is reached), increased competition, reduced prices, and diminished profitability potential. Once saturation is reached, growth begins to decline. In the decline stage, sales volume reduces and profitability diminishes further.
Every stage of the product lifecycle has important implications for marketing (Cant et al., 2006). In other words, the marketing mix must be adjusted accordingly at each stage. In the introduction stage, the focus of marketing is to develop product awareness and build the market for the product. This may be achieved through product branding, establishing product quality, obtaining intellectual property rights, penetrative pricing, selective distribution, and targeting promotional activities at early adopters.
In the growth stage, the focus of marketing shifts to growing market share and building brand preference. The firm adds more innovative features to the product, opens additional distribution channels, maintains prices, and targets promotional activities at a larger audience. In the maturity stage, the aim of marketing is to protect market share. This may be achieved by differentiating the product from the competition, lowering prices, intensifying distribution, providing purchase incentives, and emphasizing product differentiation in promotional messages. In the final decline stage, the firm has three options: retain the product by adding new features, minimize costs and focus on a niche market, or discontinue the product (Gorchels, 2006).
References
Arthur, C. (2014, September 29). Ten things to know about BlackBerry — and how much trouble it is (or isn't) in. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/sep/29/ten-things-to-know-blackberry-john-chen
Cant, M., Strydom, J., Jooste, C., & Plessis, P. (2006). Marketing management (5th ed.). Cape Town: Juta & Co. Ltd.
Friend, D. (2013). RIM's rise and fall: A short history of Research in Motion. Retrieved from http://globalnews.ca/news/384832/rims-rise-and-fall-a-short-history-of-research-in-motion/
Gorchels, L. (2006). The product manager's handbook (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Savov, V. (2016). BlackBerry's success led to its failure. Retrieved from http://www.theverge.com/2016/9/30/13119924/blackberry-failure-success
Silcoff, S., McNish, J., & Ladurantaye, S. (2013, September 27). Inside the fall of BlackBerry: How the smartphone inventor failed to adapt. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/the-inside-story-of-why-blackberry-is-failing/article14563602/?page=all
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.