Bophuthatswana Crisis 1994: Conflict and Negotiation
This paper examines the 1994 Bophuthatswana crisis, in which President Lucas Mangope attempted to keep Bophuthatswana out of South Africa's first multiracial elections, triggering widespread protests, military mutiny, and right-wing extremist intervention before his eventual removal from power. The paper explains why this conflict was selected as a case study, highlighting Mangope's authoritarian rule and his failure to negotiate in the broader interest of black South Africans. It then applies major conflict resolution frameworks — including Fisher and Ury's principled negotiation model, Ramsbotham et al.'s cosmopolitan approach, Galtung's cultural violence theory, and Klare's resource conflict thesis — to illuminate the crisis and the steps that could have averted bloodshed.
- Overview of the Bophuthatswana Crisis: 1994 crisis timeline, causes, and violent outcome
- Reasons for Selecting This Conflict: Mangope's authoritarianism and failure to negotiate
- Conflict Resolution Theories and Their Application: Fisher and Ury's five principles of principled negotiation
- Natural Resources, Cultural Violence, and Global Conflict Trends: Galtung, Klare, and global violence scholarship applied
- Conclusion: Theories synthesized to evaluate Mangope's choices
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its theoretical discussion in a specific, vivid historical case, making abstract conflict resolution principles concrete and easier to evaluate.
- It draws on a diverse range of scholarly sources — from principled negotiation (Fisher and Ury) to cultural violence (Galtung) to resource conflict (Klare) — demonstrating broad engagement with the conflict studies literature.
- The rationale for case selection is explicitly stated, which strengthens the paper's focus and signals analytical intent from the outset.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses theoretical framing as a lens for historical analysis. Rather than simply narrating events, it identifies relevant conflict and negotiation theories and explains how each applies to the Bophuthatswana case — a technique common in political science and peace studies research papers that shows the student can connect theory to practice.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a detailed factual account of the crisis, then provides a reflexive justification for the case selection, followed by a systematic survey of conflict resolution theories drawn from multiple authors. Each theoretical section builds toward an implied critique of Mangope's choices. The references section is formatted in APA style and includes journal articles, books, and online sources.
Overview of the Bophuthatswana Crisis
The Bophuthatswana crisis of 1994 was a devastating political upheaval that began when the Bophuthatswana president, Lucas Mangope, attempted to suppress widespread demonstrations and labor unrest. The people of South Africa were demanding the incorporation of the Bophuthatswana territory into South Africa ahead of the country's first multiracial election in 1994 (Holomisa, 2011; Lawrence & Manson, 1994). Lucas Mangope presided over a Bantustan — a nominally independent homeland created under the apartheid system (Lentz, 2014). The crisis provoked violent protests after President Mangope announced on 7 March 1994 that Bophuthatswana intended to boycott South Africa's general elections (Appiah & Gates, 2010). The violence quickly escalated into a mutiny by local armed forces and a strike by civil servants. The crisis was further complicated when right-wing extremists arrived with the intention of preserving Mangope's government (Cawthra, 1997).
The confrontations lasted nearly four days before Mangope succumbed to the pressure and consented to allowing the people of Bophuthatswana to participate in the forthcoming elections (Marina, 1993). Shortly afterward, however, Mangope reversed that decision. The South African Defence Force responded to this sudden change of heart by deposing Mangope and taking control of Bophuthatswana on 12 March 1994. The crisis confirmed that Mangope's government was deeply unpopular and signaled the collapse of the Bantustan system of government for most residents of the region (Cawthra, 1997).
The Bophuthatswana crisis is perhaps most vividly remembered for the live television broadcast of the shooting of three AWB (Afrikaner Weerstandsbeweging) militants. The shooting profoundly demoralized the AWB movement, whose primary goal was to preserve white minority rule. The three men were shot by a black South African police officer (Wood, 2007).
References
Appiah, K. A., & Gates, H. L. (2010). Encyclopedia of Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cawthra, G. (1997). Securing South Africa's democracy: Defence, development and security in transition. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Boston, MA: Nathan/Tyler.
Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), 291–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343390027003005
Goldstein, J. S., & Pinker, S. (2016, April 15). The decline of war and violence. The Boston Globe. Retrieved 13 February 2019 from https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2016/04/15/the-decline-war-and-violence/lxhtEplvppt0Bz9kPphzkL/story.html
Holomisa, N. S. P. (2011). A double-edged sword: A quest for a place in the African sun. Johannesburg: Real African Publishers.
Klare, M. T. (2001). Resource wars: The new landscape of global conflict. Journal of Energy Literature, 7(2), 79–103. Metropolitan Books.
Korovin, K., Tsiskaridze, N., & Voronkov, A. (2009). Conflict resolution. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 5732 LNCS, pp. 509–523). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04244-7_41
Lawrence, M., & Manson, A. (1994). The 'dog of the Boers': The rise and fall of Mangope in Bophuthatswana. Journal of Southern African Studies, 20(3), 447–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057079408708413
Lentz, H. M. (2014). Heads of states and governments since 1945. London: Routledge.
Marc, A. (n.d.). Conflicts and violence in the 21st century: Current trends as observed in empirical research and statistics. Retrieved 13 February 2019 from https://www.un.org/pga/70/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2016/01/Conflict-and-violence-in-the-21st-century-Current-trends-as-observed-in-empirical-research-and-statistics-Mr.-Alexandre-Marc-Chief-Specialist-Fragility-Conflict-and-Violence-World-Bank-Group.pdf
Marina, O. (1993). South Africa: The struggle for a new order. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Ramsbotham, O., Woodhouse, T., & Miall, H. (2016). Contemporary conflict resolution. Cambridge; Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Sagan, S. D., & Valentino, B. A. (2015). Use of force: The American public and the ethics of war. Open Global Rights. Retrieved 13 February 2019 from https://www.openglobalrights.org/use-of-force-american-public-and-ethics-of-war/
Weinstein, L. (2018). The 7 principles of conflict resolution: How to resolve disputes, defuse difficult situations and reach agreement. Harlow, England: FT Publishing/Pearson.
Wood, E. J. (2007). Forging democracy from below: Insurgent transitions in South Africa and El Salvador. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.