Skip to main content
Book Review Undergraduate 2,083 words

Cold War on the Periphery: U.S. Policy in South Asia

~11 min read 6 sections History · Cold War
Abstract

This paper reviews Robert J. McMahon's Cold War on the Periphery, which examines U.S. foreign policy toward India and Pakistan from the late 1940s through the mid-1960s. The paper traces how American Cold War anxieties led successive administrations — from Truman through Johnson — to vacillate between cultivating Pakistan as a strategic military partner and courting India as the dominant neutral power in Asia. It argues that American indecision, misreading of regional dynamics, and overriding fear of Soviet expansion ultimately destabilized South Asia, deepened the India-Pakistan rivalry over Kashmir, and ironically opened diplomatic space for both the Soviet Union and China to expand their influence in the region.

Key Takeaways
  • Introduction: The Cold War Beyond the Superpowers: McMahon's thesis on U.S. South Asia policy
  • Truman Era: India, Pakistan, and Initial U.S. Calculations: U.S. weighs India vs. Pakistan as Cold War partners
  • The Korean War and the Shift Toward Pakistan: Korea accelerates U.S. tilt toward Pakistan
  • The Eisenhower Years: Formalizing the Pakistan Alliance: 1954 U.S.-Pakistan pact and its early failures
  • Kennedy and Johnson: Shifting Alliances and Unmet Goals: Kennedy pivots to India; Johnson withdraws from both
  • Conclusion: Lessons from U.S. Cold War Missteps in South Asia: McMahon's lessons applied to present-day U.S.-India ties
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾

What makes this paper effective

  • The paper grounds its analysis in direct quotations from McMahon's primary sources — CIA assessments, diplomat memos, and political speeches — lending concrete evidentiary weight to each claim.
  • It maintains a clear chronological spine (Truman through Johnson), making a complex multi-decade policy arc easy to follow.
  • The closing turn to a contemporary op-ed by Zia Mian connects Cold War history to post-2005 U.S.-India relations, giving the review present-day relevance.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper consistently uses direct quotation with page citations to support interpretive claims about U.S. policy failures — a strong model of evidence integration in historical book reviews. Rather than simply summarizing McMahon's chapters, it synthesizes his argument into a throughline: that Cold War fear consistently overrode realistic regional appraisal.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with a thesis statement drawn from the book's central argument, then moves chronologically through each presidential administration's South Asia policy. Each section introduces a new development (Korean War, Pakistan alliance, Kennedy's India pivot) and evaluates U.S. decision-making against outcomes. The conclusion offers a brief critical assessment of McMahon's work before linking the historical analysis to a contemporary policy statement, rounding out the review with a forward-looking observation.

Essay 2,083 words

Introduction: The Cold War Beyond the Superpowers

When hearing the words "Cold War," what normally comes to mind are the events between the U.S.S.R. and the United States following World War II, including the arms race. Competition for the Third World was also part of this period, but it receives little attention by comparison. In his book Cold War on the Periphery, Robert McMahon explores in detail how the United States' alliance with Pakistan increased tensions between India and Pakistan and encouraged the Soviet Union to establish closer ties with India.

Truman Era: India, Pakistan, and Initial U.S. Calculations

In the 1940s, almost all of the Central Intelligence Agency's strategic studies concluded that the Indian subcontinent — including Pakistan — was of considerable importance to the United States. It comprised one-fifth of the world's population, had a land mass as large as Europe, and occupied a strategically significant geographical position. The CIA also noted the region's abundant resources: "It ranks first or second in world production of such critical materials of war as cotton, mica, manganese, monazite (a source of thorium), and beryl, and is a major source of raw materials, investment income, and carrying charges for the UK, thus strengthening the UK's and Western Europe's efforts toward the economic recovery essential to U.S. security" (13).

In 1947, when India and Pakistan were formed from former British colonies in South Asia, Pakistan took the majority-Muslim portion of British territory and India the predominantly Hindu portion. Jammu-Kashmir, with a majority Muslim population but a Hindu ruler, chose to join India. Many Muslims, as well as Pakistan, considered this decision illegal. Almost immediately, a war broke out between the two new nations. In 1949, the countries signed the Karachi Agreement, establishing a ceasefire line supervised by U.N. observers, though many questions remained unresolved.

Jawaharlal Nehru, prime minister of India and an advocate of the Socialistic Pattern of Society, visited the United States in 1949. President Truman and his administration had considered both India and Pakistan as possible partners. Not surprisingly, they concluded that India offered far more strategic clout than Pakistan. Special Adviser Philip C. Jessup judged India "the most solid associate in the Asian area" and called Nehru "outstandingly the most vital and influential person for the accomplishment of U.S. objectives in Asia" (35).

However, India made this potential partnership difficult. Nehru made clear that India needed help but not at a political cost. In 1948, he had bluntly conveyed his disdain for Pakistani claims when he told Secretary of State George C. Marshall that India's position on Kashmir was morally, legally, and practically correct. He denounced the so-called "gangsters from Pakistan" who had aided the tribal invasion of Kashmir and contrasted "the backward and theocratic nature of Pakistan" with the secular, democratic orientation of India. "India wished to develop a country wherein all elements of the population could share," he said, "whereas in Pakistan the underlying idea was the advancement of the most bigoted group of Moslems" (29).

Meanwhile, in other parts of the world, events heightened American anxieties about communist expansion. The Soviet Union conducted its first nuclear test, and the Communist Party seized control of the Chinese government.

Pakistani Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan sought to counter Nehru's Washington visit by accepting an invitation from Josef Stalin to visit the Soviet Union. U.S. Assistant Secretary McGhee, deeply concerned about a potential Pakistan-USSR alignment, suggested that Pakistan be invited to visit the United States instead. Unlike India, Pakistan was openly appreciative of American plans for South Asia. Given India's refusal to align with the West and Pakistan's advantageous geographical position, America began to seriously consider Pakistan as a second-best partner — though it was reluctant to sever ties with India or supply arms to Pakistan.

4 Sections Hidden · 1,060 words
The Korean War and the Shift Toward Pakistan280 words
The outbreak of the Korean War in 1950 significantly shifted American thinking about Asia, as it represented yet another instance of Soviet-backed aggression. The United States quickly deployed troops and dispatched the Seventh Fleet…
The Eisenhower Years: Formalizing the Pakistan Alliance310 words
When Truman left office, the question of India and Pakistan remained unresolved. President Eisenhower also viewed the Soviet Union as a fundamental danger.…
Kennedy and Johnson: Shifting Alliances and Unmet Goals290 words
Under the Kennedy administration, the alliance with India took on renewed importance. Concerns about Soviet inroads — from Europe to Third World nations…
Conclusion: Lessons from U.S. Cold War Missteps in South Asia180 words
Despite how frustrating it is to read about America's serious blundering, McMahon's book documents this period with detail and genuine interest. History once again demonstrates that policy fails when decisions are driven…
Key Concepts in This Paper
Cold War Strategy South Asia Policy Kashmir Dispute Pakistan Alliance Indian Nonalignment Soviet Influence U.S. Indecision Third World Competition Nuclear Arms Race Indo-Pakistani Tensions
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Cold War on the Periphery: U.S. Policy in South Asia. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/cold-war-us-policy-india-pakistan-68789

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.