This paper examines two foundational models of criminal justice theory: the conflict model and the consensus model. Drawing on Marxist and labeling theory traditions, the conflict model argues that criminal law and enforcement serve elite class interests, disproportionately penalizing the poor and minorities through mechanisms such as racially skewed drug sentencing and differential perceptions of street versus white-collar crime. The consensus model, by contrast, holds that law reflects shared social norms and benefits all members of society, including the disadvantaged. The paper evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of each framework, ultimately suggesting that neither model alone fully captures the complexities of justice, inequality, and social change in modern society.
The conflict-based model of criminal justice theory views all of human society as inherently gripped by conflict, with a specific emphasis on class-based conflict. Conflict theory in criminology is most closely associated with Marxism as its underlying economic framework. Marxists take a broad, sweeping view of all of human global history as an eternal, polarized struggle between the "haves" and the "have-nots" of the world. The haves — which in modern, industrialized society are the bourgeois property-owners — attempt to hold onto their power by manipulating all existing political and economic structures to disenfranchise the have-nots.
The have-nots of the world occasionally chafe against this control, but they often do so ineffectually, through petty crimes and unorganized or organized criminal activities. Crime can actually act as a kind of "safety valve" — a release for criminal impulses spawned by economic injustice. For example, if drug dealers profit from their sales, and drug abuse and distribution are only partially contained through the criminal justice system, then the poor may view the sale of illicit drugs as a potential way of circumventing what is an economically stacked deck against them.
Conflict theory suggests that rather than being an objective source of impartial justice, "the criminal justice system and criminal law are thought to be operating on behalf of rich and powerful social elites, with resulting policies aimed at controlling the poor" (Greek, Conflict theory, 2005). A clear example of this is how violent street crimes tend to be punished more harshly than white-collar crimes. A white-collar crime — such as a CEO who allows a company to pollute a water supply through negligence, or an executive who engages in insider trading — can have just as damaging physical and economic effects on society as someone who commits a spontaneous act of violent crime. The fact that society perceives street crime more negatively is a cultural construct rather than a material reflection of the actual seriousness of the offense.
Beyond these examples, there are also statistical and anecdotal indicators that justice is not blind. Minorities are disproportionately represented in jails. Judges treat "hard" drugs more commonly used in minority communities — such as crack cocaine and heroin — more harshly than equally addictive substances like prescription painkillers. As Gaines and Miller note: "The penalty (five years in prison) for possession of 5 grams of crack cocaine is the same as for possession of 500 grams of powder cocaine. This 1:100 ratio has had widespread implications for inner-city African Americans, who are statistically more likely to get caught using crack cocaine than are white suburbanites, who appear to favor the illicit drug in its powdered form" (Gaines & Miller, 2011, p. 6).
White, privileged individuals are often perceived as having a "sickness" when they use drugs — or even when they shoplift — whereas minorities and members of the underclass are frequently perceived as criminals by nature. This disparity reflects deep structural biases embedded in the enforcement and interpretation of criminal law.
"How labeling shapes criminal identity and behavior"
"Law as shared social norms benefiting all citizens"
"Strengths, limits, and comparison of both models"
You’re 35% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.