This paper examines educational inequality through the lens of conflict theory, arguing that schools are not neutral institutions but rather mechanisms that reproduce and reinforce existing social hierarchies. Drawing on sociological sources, the paper explores how public and private schools deliver fundamentally different curricula — one designed to instill compliance, the other to cultivate critical thinking and a sense of entitlement. It also discusses the concept of socially just classrooms, the relationship between capitalism and schooling, and how rule-following behavior among teachers, parents, and students perpetuates inequality. The paper concludes that the educational system consistently privileges upper-class interests while limiting the social mobility of lower-class individuals.
Inequality can often be observed in classrooms in contemporary society, and it is difficult for educational institutions to devise strategies that effectively combat this problem. When examining the issue from the perspective of conflict theory, one gains a better understanding of why inequality persists in classrooms. Individuals who support this theory argue that education is actually meant to promote social inequality and to support those who control the social order. Conflict theory essentially claims that education is designed to prevent lower classes from experiencing success while helping upper classes gain significant advantages that allow them to maintain their social status.
Conflict theorists are not necessarily determined to demonstrate that education fails to support cultural values, socialize young people, or sort students. Rather, they argue that these functions are applied selectively and preferentially. They maintain that schools sustain existing conditions in contemporary society and support the concept of inequality because those in authority regard this arrangement as perfectly normal and acceptable.
Some conflict theorists argue that while public schools deliver a fixed curriculum, private schools provide students with a hidden curriculum. Whereas public schools present students with a curriculum that teaches them to "wait your turn, follow the rules, be punctual, and show respect, as well as learning not to ask questions" (Brinkerhoff, White, & Ortega 273), the curriculum in private schools teaches "young people to think creatively and critically and to assume that they are naturally superior and deserving of privilege" (Brinkerhoff, White, & Ortega 273). Moreover, by promoting the idea that it is perfectly normal for individuals to expect unequal rewards because of differing achievements, the educational system indirectly conditions them to accept inequality as natural (Brinkerhoff, White, & Ortega 273).
The social order is essentially the result of society's tendency to teach people that they must act in accordance with an organized system. From a very young age, children are taught that they must compete for social and economic resources. As conflict theorists note, "when consensus exists, according to conflict theorists, it is attributable to people being united around common interests, often in opposition to other groups" (Andersen & Taylor 18).
Socially just classrooms are institutions where teachers address children as individuals and do not grant preferential rewards to pupils who learn more easily. In contrast to most conventional classrooms, these environments prepare individuals to integrate into a just social system in which each person focuses on activities that reflect their genuine interests. In order to incorporate students' voices into the subjects a teacher wishes to cover, the teacher must first strive to understand each student individually. This allows the teacher to address students in ways that align with their thinking and learning styles.
By understanding what a student is passionate about, a teacher can use that interest as a bridge to explain concepts that the student might otherwise find difficult to grasp. For students to truly become part of a just schooling system, they also need to be encouraged to question and critique teachers who are inclined to favor particular individuals on the basis of their ability to absorb information quickly. Teachers must recognize that many children are unable to learn effectively unless they can interact with the teacher in a meaningful and personalized way. As a consequence, these children need to be treated with individual attention, and teachers must focus on supporting them in their learning until they are genuinely able to progress independently.
"Capitalism shapes schooling to limit social mobility"
"Rule compliance preserves unequal power structures"
Ballentine, Jeanne H., and Spade, Joan Z. Schools and Society: A Sociological Approach to Education. Pine Forge Press, 2008.
Brinkerhoff, David B., White, Lynn K., and Ortega, Suzanne T. Essentials of Sociology. Cengage Learning, 2007.
Garner, Roberta. Social Theory: Power and Identity in the Global Era. University of Toronto Press, 2010.
You’re 57% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.