Educator Impact on Emotionally Disturbed Students
This paper examines the role of educators in supporting students diagnosed with emotional disturbance (ED) in inclusive and self-contained classroom settings. Drawing on research by Ogonosky, Rush, Gresham, and Harris-Murri et al., the paper reviews the behavioral challenges these students present, the legal and practical demands placed on teachers through Individualized Education Programs (IEPs), and the consequences of inadequate identification and support. The paper emphasizes classroom management strategies, positive reinforcement, trigger avoidance, and response-to-intervention models as key tools for educators. It also highlights the systemic failures that leave many emotionally disturbed students underserved, contributing to high dropout and arrest rates, and argues that trust-based teacher-student relationships are central to achieving meaningful educational outcomes.
- Introduction: Inclusion and the Challenge of Emotional Disturbance: Framing inclusive education and the ED challenge
- Classroom Management and Behavioral Strategies: Day-to-day strategies for managing ED behaviors
- IEPs, Triggers, and Positive Reinforcement: Using IEPs, avoiding triggers, reinforcing positively
- Self-Contained Classrooms and Teacher Stress: Pressures on teachers in isolated ED classrooms
- Systemic Gaps in Identifying and Serving ED Students: Underidentification and underfunding of ED services
- Response to Intervention and Dynamic Educator Approaches: RTI models for flexible, graduated ED support
- Conclusion: The Educator's Role in Student Development: Trust, reinforcement, and lasting educator impact
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Integrates multiple peer-reviewed and professional sources to build a coherent, evidence-based argument about educator responsibilities toward emotionally disturbed students.
- Balances practical classroom strategies (trigger avoidance, rule posting, positive reinforcement) with broader systemic critique (underfunding, misidentification, high dropout rates).
- Uses specific statistics — such as the 55% dropout rate and 73% arrest rate — to underscore the real-world stakes of inadequate ED education, making abstract policy concerns concrete and urgent.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective literature synthesis: rather than summarizing each source in isolation, it weaves findings from Ogonosky, Rush, Gresham, and Harris-Murri et al. into a single progressive argument. Each source adds a new dimension — classroom tactics, institutional pressures, prevalence data, and intervention models — building toward the paper's central claim about trust-based, positive-reinforcement-driven educator impact.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a broad policy framing on inclusive education before narrowing to the specific challenge of emotional disturbance. A literature review section occupies the bulk of the paper, organized thematically around classroom management, IEP compliance, self-contained classrooms, systemic failures, and response-to-intervention models. The conclusion synthesizes these threads into actionable recommendations centered on positive reinforcement and teacher-student relationships. The Works Cited section follows APA formatting conventions.
Introduction: Inclusion and the Challenge of Emotional Disturbance
The inclusion of disabled individuals in the general social, educational, and occupational contexts that welcome mainstream populations is a goal which appears to parallel the progressive orientation of our culture. Modern education shows evidence of a trend toward change, facilitating the increasing integration of individuals who are physically, emotionally, or learning disabled into public and private schools. This trend has been a decidedly positive one, with legal, economic, and educational strategies coming together to produce an effective and productive shift in the way we address disabilities.
Inclusive education practice holds that educational institutions should be responsible for creating accommodations that assimilate disabled students into mainstream classroom settings and for providing them with the supportive, differentiated instruction needed to succeed therein. This approach presents a number of challenges and opportunities for educators with respect to special education. Among the greatest of these challenges is the combination of learning disability and behavioral abnormality. Students who are categorized as emotionally disturbed carry specific obstacles to the reach of educators, typically manifested in disruptive, inappropriate, unstable, or sometimes violent and dangerous behavior.
This paper investigates the role of the educator in establishing control over negative behaviors, elaborates the strategies that can aid the educator in intervening with such behaviors, and considers the broader impact on the classroom of the presence of an emotionally disturbed student. The intent is to highlight the best response mechanisms for educators attempting to positively impact emotionally disturbed students.
Works Cited
Gresham, F. M. (2005). Response to Intervention: An alternative means of identifying students as emotionally disturbed. Education and Treatment of Children, 28(4), 328–344.
Harris-Murri, N., King, K., & Rostenberg, D. (2006). Reducing disproportionate minority representation in special education programs for students with emotional disturbances: Toward a culturally responsive response to intervention model. Education and Treatment of Children, 29(4), 779–799.
Ogonosky, A. (2009). Emotionally disturbed students. Association of Texas Professional Educators.
Rush, S. (2005). Improving education for students with emotional disturbance. Knowability.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.