Emotional Intelligence and Performance in Virtual Teams
This paper examines the relationship between emotional intelligence (EI) and team performance, with a focus on virtual teams. Drawing on three peer-reviewed studies, it reviews findings on how EI components — including understanding, managing, and identifying emotions — correlate with team outcomes. The paper evaluates each study's methodology and limitations, then raises questions about how modern collaboration technologies and hybrid work arrangements may alter the dynamics identified in earlier research. It concludes by noting that rapid technological change makes continued investigation of EI in virtual and semi-virtual team contexts increasingly important.
- Introduction: Overview of EI research scope and approach
- Emotional Intelligence and Team Problem Solving: Jordan and Troth study on EI and problem-solving
- EI Components and Customer Service Team Performance: Feyerhem and Rice on EI components and outcomes
- Emotional Intelligence in Virtual Teams: Pitts et al. study on EI in virtual settings
- Research Methods and Emerging Questions: Mixed methods discussion and technology questions
- Conclusion: Technology, hybrid teams, and future research
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Each study is summarized and then critically evaluated, identifying both strengths and limitations rather than simply reporting findings.
- The paper moves logically from established in-person EI research to virtual-team-specific studies, building a coherent argument about what is known and what remains unexplored.
- The closing section raises concrete, forward-looking research questions grounded in the reviewed literature, demonstrating applied analytical thinking.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates critical literature synthesis — not merely summarizing sources but comparing their scope, methodology, and limitations in relation to one another. The student explicitly notes where studies fall short (e.g., student participants lacking real-world stakes, perception-based performance metrics) while still acknowledging each study's contribution to the field.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a framing paragraph, then devotes one section each to three key studies, assessing each for relevance and rigor. A methodology discussion follows, addressing mixed-methods considerations. The paper closes with two forward-looking research questions about technology and hybrid teams. Three references support the analysis. This is a concise literature review appropriate for undergraduate coursework.
Introduction
Many articles discuss emotional intelligence in teams, and a few address virtual teams specifically. Key to understanding the role that emotional intelligence plays on virtual teams is knowing the differences between virtual teams and conventional work teams, understanding how emotional intelligence might affect a traditional team, and then being able to extrapolate how those differences might change outcomes.
Emotional Intelligence and Team Problem Solving
Jordan and Troth (2004) discuss the role that emotional intelligence plays in problem solving. They found that emotional intelligence is positively associated with team performance and problem solving. Their study was conducted in person, so the researchers were able to observe participants directly and compare subjects accurately, since everybody was given the same problem to solve. The study is valuable because it clearly establishes the link between emotional intelligence and team performance.
References
Feyerhem, A. & Rice, C. (2002). Emotional intelligence and team performance: The good, the bad and the ugly. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 10(4), 343–362.
Jordan, P. & Troth, A. (2004). Managing emotions during team problem solving: Emotional intelligence and conflict resolution. Human Performance, 17(2), 195–218.
Pitts, V., Wright, N., & Harkabus, L. (2012). Communication in virtual teams: The role of emotional intelligence. Journal of Organizational Psychology, 12(3/4), 21–34.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.