eSports as Real Sports: Physical, Mental, and Market Case
This paper argues that eSports deserve recognition as legitimate sports by examining evidence across three dimensions: physical demands, psychological and social factors, and market value. Drawing on recent scholarly and popular sources, the paper demonstrates that eSports require specialized fine motor skills, intensive training, and carry real injury risks comparable to traditional Olympic sports. The psychological dimensions—including teamwork, strategy, sportsmanship, and discipline—mirror those of conventional athletics. Finally, the paper considers the economic significance of eSports, including a global audience of approximately 300 million, multi-million-dollar prize pools, and growing interest from the NCAA and the International Olympic Committee, as further evidence of their legitimacy as a recognized sport category.
- Introduction: eSports introduced as controversial but legitimate sports
- Physical Demands of eSports: Fine motor skills, injuries, and training requirements examined
- Psychological and Social Dimensions: Teamwork, strategy, sportsmanship, and inclusivity discussed
- Market Value and Economic Legitimacy: Global audience, revenue, sponsorships, and NCAA interest covered
- Conclusion: Literature synthesis affirms eSports as real sports
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The argument is organized thematically around three distinct criteria for sport legitimacy—physical, psychological, and economic—making the case systematic and easy to follow.
- The paper effectively uses analogies to established Olympic sports (rifle shooting, dressage, rhythmic gymnastics) to preempt counterarguments and highlight inconsistencies in how "sport" is defined.
- Source variety is strong: the paper blends peer-reviewed sports medicine research, sports management scholarship, and credible popular commentary to build a well-rounded case.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of a literature review structure to synthesize multiple sources around a central claim. Rather than summarizing sources one by one, the author groups them by theme—physical demands, social factors, market value—showing how the body of literature collectively supports the thesis. This technique is especially useful in argumentative essays that must demonstrate the breadth of scholarly consensus.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a framing introduction that situates eSports within broader debates about what qualifies as a sport. A literature review section follows, organized into three thematic subsections: physical activity and injury risk, psychological and social dimensions, and market valuation. A brief synthesis paragraph closes the literature review before the references section. The structure is appropriate for an undergraduate argumentative research paper of this scope.
Introduction
When new sports are introduced to the global market, they are frequently met with disdain, ridicule, or mistrust. Even when those sports become popular, stalwarts of the old guard cling to their notion of what differentiates a "real" sport from a "mere" game or hobby. Some sports now entrenched in the Olympic Games, such as snowboarding, were once derided. On the other hand, many sports that have been mainstays in the Olympics still do not meet all the typical definitions of what constitutes a sport. Synchronized swimming and rhythmic gymnastics are physically challenging but are not sports in the way that rugby or soccer are, yet the latter two are not included in the Olympics while the former two are.
The most recent sport to command a considerable amount of media attention and controversy regarding its status is gaming—or eSports. eSports have taken the world by storm in recent years, with fans filling stadiums that hold 91,000 people (Stewart, 2017). Based on their proven spectator appeal and growing popularity worldwide, the advertising and marketing potential of eSports is even greater than it is for many traditional sports. Most eSports also demand both physical and psychological training, good sportsmanship practices, teamwork, and game strategy. Because they resemble traditional sports from the player perspective and the perspective of spectators and marketers, eSports can and should be considered "real sports."
Physical Demands of eSports
The recent literature on the status of eSports has been supportive of this growing industry. One of the first themes in a review of the literature is whether eSports involve enough physical activity to be considered sports at all. According to Hallmann and Giel (2018), several professional sports organizations list physical activity as a "core element of sport" (p. 2). Because gaming has long been associated with a sedentary lifestyle, it has been unfairly assumed that eSports do not require physical activity and therefore cannot be classified as real sports. Research on eSports, and contributions from sports medicine, are dispelling the misperception that eSports are not physically demanding. In an article published in a British Medical Journal publication, Pereira, Brito, Figueiredo, et al. (2019) argue that eSports are real in the sense that they are physically demanding.
Each sport presents unique physical challenges to its players. eSports require intensive training and the development of specialized fine motor skills, which often lead to sports injuries such as repetitive stress and strain (Pereira, Brito, Figueiredo, et al., 2019) or broken fingers (Rosen, 2017). Playing eSports requires excessive screen time, which can cause eyestrain. Hand-eye coordination must be skillfully honed in eSports (Rosen, 2017). The fine motor skills used in rifle shooting or dressage—which are Olympic sports—are rarely called into question, which is another reason why eSports should be taken more seriously (Moosa, 2017). An overview of the literature therefore confirms that eSports involve every bit as much in the way of physical demands as other competitive sports.
Psychological and Social Dimensions
Another theme in the literature relates to the psychological and social dimensions of eSports. Factors such as sportsmanship, teamwork, composure, and commitment are all mentioned in the research. As Rosen (2017) points out, competitive eSports players "need to be extremely competitive against the opposing team along with being a team player in your own" (p. 1). Strategy and tactics are essential for eSports, perhaps even more so than in other traditional sports (Hallmann & Giel, 2018).
Keiper, Manning, Jenny, et al. (2017) add a unique perspective to the discussion on the validity of eSports by pointing out that, more than any other sport, eSports have the potential to break down barriers related to gender, race and ethnicity, and socioeconomic class. The "ethical values" and "organizational structure" dimensions of traditional sports are also present in eSports, according to Hallmann and Giel (2018, p. 2). On both individual and team levels, eSports require similar levels of discipline and training as any other competitive event.
Conclusion
Marketing, spectator appeal, a specialized set of mental, social, and physical skills, strategy, and training are all dimensions of eSports. Both scholarly and popular texts focusing on the global phenomenon of eSports tend to support the idea that eSports are "real," with opposing views gradually fading as eSports become increasingly popular around the world.
References
Hallmann, K. & Giel, T. (2018). eSports—Competitive sports or recreational activity? Sport Management Review, 21(1): 14–20.
Keiper, M. C., Manning, R. D., Jenny, S., Olrich, T., & Croft, C. (2017). No reason to LoL at LoL: the addition of esports to intercollegiate athletic departments. Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education, 11(2), 143–160. doi:10.1080/19357397.2017.1316001
Moosa, T. (2017). eSports are real sports. The Guardian. 11 Aug, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/11/esports-olympic-video-games-ioc-gaming
Pereira, A. M., Brito, J., Figueiredo, P., et al. (2019). Virtual sports deserve real sports medical attention. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine, 5(1). Retrieved from https://bmjopensem.bmj.com/content/5/1/e000606.abstract
Rosen, G. (2017). Should e-sports be considered real sports? The Telescope. Retrieved from https://www.palomar.edu/telescope/2017/11/14/should-e-sports-be-considered-real-sports-pro/
Stewart, J. (2017). Why esports ARE real sports: Video gamers' talents compare with those of athletes and their tournaments rival viewing figures of sport events. Mail Online. 24 Aug, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/esports/article-4812762/Why-esports-real-sports.html
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.