Ethics in Forensic Mental Health: A Case Study Analysis

Introduction: Ethics in Mental Health Care

Ethics is a grey area in many instances within the medical community. Ethical codes help by providing guidance that allows for professional judgment and discretion in navigating the idiosyncratic nature of ethical dilemmas. As noted in foundational discussions of ethics, the discipline is primarily understood as a serious reflective activity concerned with the methodical examination of the ethical life (Callaghan & Ryan, 2012). It is intended to illuminate what should be done by asking practitioners to consider and reconsider ordinary justifications, actions, and judgments.

In the case study, Wayne became afraid to tell anyone anything. Nurses did not know his condition, and he was behaving in a violent manner. Medical staff who tended to him perceived him as either mentally ill or antisocial — and it seemed he was both. Eventually, he was able to speak with a psychiatrist he had previously met. He felt confident enough to reveal what had happened to him because of that prior relationship.

However, this proved to be both an important and a complicated situation. During court proceedings, the psychiatrist he had trusted revealed his violent and criminal history. This not only heightened his already elevated level of paranoia but also made it appear as though the patient confidentiality aspect of medical care could not be trusted. The topic of the common law duty to warn covers the confidential and open nature of psychotherapy and how it encourages disclosure among patients. If patients like Wayne feel apprehensive about discussing their issues with doctors, they may never receive the treatment they need.

Patient Confidentiality and the Duty to Warn

Some medical staff, as noted above, were unaware of how ill Wayne truly was. Had he simply disclosed his prior history and medical background, he might have been treated more appropriately. However, now that he perceived doctors as untrustworthy — because of that negative experience in court — it risked creating serious problems in the future.

Wayne had received prior treatment, yet he continued to disregard his medication and allowed his schizophrenia to resurface. Nevertheless, from the perspective of a criminal case, the psychiatrist had some justification for disclosing aspects of Wayne's history. Revealing his criminal history and mental illness reframed the case less as a matter of criminal culpability and more as a call to provide him with appropriate mental health assistance. There are situations in which doctors must waive patient confidentiality.

The concept of false positives is also relevant here — the idea that prediction has its limitations and that no one can know with certainty how a scenario will play out. Thanks to the 1976 Tarasoff Decision in the United States, clinicians acquired a duty to safeguard third parties from a client's foreseeable violence. In Wayne's case, his prior violent behavior was known. It was therefore considered ethical to disclose that history so he could be treated appropriately and, ideally, future harm could be prevented.

Virtue Ethics and Staff Conduct During Hospitalization

Regarding Wayne's interactions with medical staff during his six months of treatment, several ethically grey areas emerged. First, the matter of horse-racing bets: Wayne providing betting tips to staff members is ethically problematic, as medical staff are not supposed to engage with patients in that manner. Another irregular occurrence was Wayne performing allocated tasks for the staff. As a patient, he should have been focused on his recovery, not carrying out duties on behalf of hospital employees.

Medical staff have defined responsibilities. Those who work in sanitation should perform the tasks assigned to them — not patients. Aristotle's concept of virtue, the idea that a life lived through virtue leads to happiness, is instructive here. The hospital staff were not behaving virtuously by gambling and soliciting betting tips from a patient. Aristotle held that without justice, benevolence, and courage, people cannot achieve genuine happiness, since these are fundamental virtues.

A virtue has several components, one of which is the exercise of judgment in making choices. The medical staff were failing to exercise sound judgment. Unlike Wayne, they were of sound mind and body and therefore bore a greater responsibility for their conduct. They should not have been modeling inappropriate behavior, nor should they have engaged in unlawful or professionally frowned-upon activities. Mentally ill individuals are often already vulnerable and sometimes treated as second-class citizens. If the goal is rehabilitation, exposing a mentally ill patient to unethical behavior — as described in this case study — risks causing regression and reinforcing negative coping mechanisms such as manipulation.

When Wayne was eventually released or granted a leave of absence, he was required to undergo extensive testing and monitoring. He was prohibited from consuming alcohol or drugs. Had virtuous role models influenced him during his hospitalization, he might have had an easier transition after discharge. Evidence of moral difficulty is apparent in his positive urine test for cannabis and in his fluctuating medication levels. Wayne must take his medication consistently or risk another violent episode. His disregard for the rules — smoking cannabis and not taking the prescribed dosage — suggests he may eventually stop taking his medication altogether, as he had done previously.

Conclusion

People view ethics and ethical codes through many shades of grey. In Wayne's case, he clearly suffered from serious mental health problems. Yet because of his profound distrust of medical staff, many clinicians remained unaware of his true condition. He was not sent to prison to be punished for his crimes, because the law regarded him as unfit to stand trial. Nevertheless, this status does not justify allowing others to cross professional boundaries with him — whether by soliciting gambling advice or overlooking failed drug tests. Situations like Wayne's must be handled in a manner that is appropriate and fair not only for the individual patient, but for the wider community as well.

References

Allnutt, S., & Chaplow, D. (2000). General principles of forensic report writing. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 34(6), 980–987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1614.2000.00834.x

Callaghan, S., & Ryan, C. (2012). Rising to the human rights challenge in compulsory treatment — new approaches to mental health law in Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 46(7), 611–620. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0004867412438872

Emanuel, L. (2000). Ethics and the structures of healthcare. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 9(02). http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0963180100902032

Fins, J., Miller, F., & Bacchetta, M. (1997). Clinical pragmatism: A method of moral problem solving. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 7(2), 129–143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/ken.1997.0013

Gauthier, J. (2009). Ethical principles and human rights: Building a better world globally. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 22(1), 25–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09515070902857301

Grubin, D. (1999). Therapist or public protector? Ethical responses to anti-social sexual behaviour. Sexual and Marital Therapy, 14(3), 277–288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02674659908405412

Kopelman, L. (1990). On the evaluative nature of competency and capacity judgments. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 13(4), 309–329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0160-2527(90)90024-w

Lazzaretto-Green, D., Austin, W., Goble, E., Buys, L., Gorman, T., & Rankel, M. (2011). Walking a fine line: Forensic mental health practitioners' experience of working with correctional officers. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 7(3), 109–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-3938.2011.01107.x

McSherry, B. (2001). Confidentiality of psychiatric and psychological communications: The public interest exception. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 8(1), 12–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13218710109525000

Moulden, H., & Firestone, P. (2010). Therapist awareness and responsibility in working with sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22(4), 374–386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1079063210382047

Scott, R. (2007). Fitness for trial in Queensland. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 14(2), 327–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1375/pplt.14.2.327

The concept of boundaries in clinical practice: Theoretical and risk-management dimensions. (1993). American Journal of Psychiatry, 150(2), 188–196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/ajp.150.2.188

Ward, S. (2011). Ethics and the media. Cambridge University Press.

Ward, T. (2013). Addressing the dual relationship problem in forensic and correctional practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(1), 92–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2012.10.006

Winick, B. (2008). A therapeutic jurisprudence approach to dealing with coercion in the mental health system. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 15(1), 25–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13218710801979084