Euthanasia and End-of-Life Ethics in Nursing Practice
This paper examines the ethical dilemmas nurses encounter regarding euthanasia and end-of-life care, using a real-world case study to illustrate a clear violation of the American Nurses Association's position statements on the subject. Drawing on the ANA Code of Ethics, research on nurse attitudes toward euthanasia, and principles such as beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice, the paper argues that nurses must not act with the intent to terminate a patient's life regardless of personal beliefs. The paper concludes with practical recommendations for education, institutional policy, and professional advocacy to help nurses navigate these challenging situations ethically.
- Introduction: A Case Study in End-of-Life Decision-Making: Real-world case illustrating a nursing ethics violation
- ANA Position Statements and the Nurse's Ethical Role: ANA guidelines prohibiting nurse-assisted euthanasia
- Research on Nurse Attitudes Toward Euthanasia: Empirical data on nurse euthanasia attitudes and behaviors
- Ethical Principles and the Slippery Slope Argument: Beneficence, nonmaleficence, and risks of permissive standards
- Recommendations for Education and Institutional Policy: Policy and training solutions for end-of-life dilemmas
- Personal Advocacy and Conclusion: Individual nurse advocacy and professional commitments
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Opens with a compelling, concrete case study that grounds the ethical discussion in a real-world scenario, making the stakes immediately clear to the reader.
- Anchors every claim in authoritative sources — specifically the ANA position statements and peer-reviewed nursing research — lending credibility to a sensitive argument.
- Moves logically from descriptive (what happened) to normative (what should happen) to prescriptive (what should be done), giving the paper a clear and satisfying arc.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses the slippery slope argument as an ethical framework, showing how permitting individual nurses to make end-of-life decisions without institutional constraints could lead to increasingly problematic outcomes. This is paired with the application of foundational nursing ethics principles — beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice — to the case at hand, demonstrating how abstract ethical theory maps onto clinical practice.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a six-part structure: (1) a case study introduction establishing the ethical problem; (2) a review of ANA guidelines that define appropriate nurse conduct; (3) empirical research on nurse attitudes; (4) ethical analysis using core principles; (5) concrete policy and education recommendations; and (6) a brief personal advocacy statement. This structure moves from problem identification through analysis to solution, which is a model approach for applied ethics papers in professional fields.
Introduction: A Case Study in End-of-Life Decision-Making
A particularly troubling end-of-life case illustrates the ethical dangers nurses can face in clinical settings. A terminally ill woman had been receiving treatment for breast cancer when the disease spread to her lungs and brain. One evening, after returning from treatment, she began to experience hallucinations and became severely confused. Her husband brought her to a local emergency room, where she was combative, confused, and delirious. The ER physician immediately asked whether he wanted her placed on life support, given that her condition was terminal. He requested life support until he could consult with her oncologists at a larger university hospital. However, he was discouraged by the physicians and nurses and made to feel uncomfortable about his request, though he remained insistent. Once she was sedated — and found not to require breathing assistance — she was kept sedated and placed in a private room.
After being informed by her physicians that her condition was most likely terminal, her husband decided not to pursue life support if it became necessary and communicated this decision to his wife's nurse. He also expressed that he did not want her to suffer. There was, however, no advanced directive or power of attorney (POA) agreement in place. Nonetheless, following this statement, a nurse administered a morphine IV push, and the patient passed away within minutes.
ANA Position Statements and the Nurse's Ethical Role
In direct contrast to the above incident, the American Nurses Association (ANA) Position Statement (2010) — Registered Nurses' Roles and Responsibilities in Providing Expert Care and Counseling at the End of Life — explicitly states: "…it is never ethically permissible for a nurse to act by omission or commission, including, but not limited to medication administration, with the intention of ending a patient's life" (ANA, 2010, p. 2). Earlier position statements have upheld the same standard. Both the 1994 ANA Position Statement on Active Euthanasia and the 1994 ANA Position Statement on Assisted Suicide clearly state that nurses are not to take an active role in terminating a patient's life, whether by omission or commission.
Nurses play a key role in assisting patients at the end of their lives. They should be capable of providing comfort, care, guidance, and relief from suffering — including physical, emotional, spiritual, and existential interventions. Nurses should be prepared to provide these forms of support to patients and to their families. It becomes an ethical violation, however, when a nurse personally extends her role to include terminating the patient's life. While there are also obvious legal concerns in such cases, this paper focuses on the ethical implications. It should be noted that in situations involving DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) or AND (Allow Natural Death) orders, nurses do not violate their code of ethics by following those procedures. Similarly, the withdrawal of therapies that would prove inadequate or unduly burdensome to a terminally ill patient, or compliance with a valid POA request to withdraw treatment, does not violate ANA position statements. In the case described above, however, a clear ethical violation occurred.
Research on Nurse Attitudes Toward Euthanasia
It is clear that nurses who allow personal opinions to dictate professional actions are not behaving ethically. To use a simple analogy: should a Muslim nurse refuse to allow a patient to eat a ham sandwich? Empirical research has indicated that, despite the ANA position statements, many nurses hold personal favorable opinions regarding assisted suicide or euthanasia that can result in unethical behaviors. In a widely cited study, Asch and DeKay (1997) analyzed data from 852 critical care nurses regarding their attitudes and practices. Findings revealed that a surprising 19% of nurses reported having engaged in euthanasia, and only a minority (30%) believed that euthanasia is unethical. Nurses who were older, held stronger religious convictions, or worked in cardiac care units were less likely to report having engaged in euthanasia; however, the effects of age and religious belief were mediated by attitude — specifically, a favorable attitude toward euthanasia. Subsequent research has supported these findings (De Beer, Gastmans, & Dierckx de Casterlé, 2004).
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2009). End-of-Life Nursing Education Consortium (ELNEC). Retrieved January 31, 2012, from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/ELNEC/factsheet.htm
American Nurses Association. (2001). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. Silver Spring, MD: Author.
American Nurses Association. (2010). ANA Nursing World. In ANA Position Statements. Retrieved January 31, 2012, from
Asch, D. A., & DeKay, M. L. (1997). Euthanasia among U.S. critical care nurses: Practices, attitudes, and social and professional correlates. Medical Care, 35, 890–900.
De Beer, T., Gastmans, C., & Dierckx de Casterlé, B. (2004). Involvement of nurses in euthanasia: A review of the literature. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30(5), 494–498.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.