Financial Literacy: College vs. High School Students Study
This research proposal examines the state of financial literacy among high school and college students in the United States. Drawing on prior studies that document low financial literacy rates among high school students, adults, and college students alike, the paper identifies a gap in the literature: few studies compare financial literacy levels between high school graduates and college students. The proposed study aims to address this gap by surveying 1,800 participants from 20 institutions across 10 states, using a 52-question instrument to assess knowledge of personal finance topics including savings, borrowing, investments, and insurance. The study hypothesizes that college education significantly improves financial literacy and outlines a methodology employing ANOVA, logistic regression, and Cronbach's alpha to ensure rigor and validity.
- The Problem of Financial Illiteracy: Evidence of low financial literacy across age groups
- Financial Literacy Among College Students: Gap in literature on college student financial knowledge
- Research Questions and Hypotheses: Two hypotheses comparing HS and college literacy
- Research Methodology and Design: Survey instrument, scoring, and statistical analysis plan
- Sampling Strategy and Study Controls: Diverse sampling across schools, states, and demographics
- Conclusion and Study Rationale: Justification of design and quality assurance measures
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The proposal clearly identifies a gap in existing literature — that most financial literacy studies focus on adults or high school students, neglecting direct comparisons with college students — and builds its rationale around filling that gap.
- The hypotheses are stated in both positive and negative form, demonstrating methodological awareness and scientific rigor typical of a well-structured research proposal.
- The methodology section is detailed and transparent, specifying sample sizes, geographic diversity, statistical tools (ANOVA, logistic regression, Cronbach's alpha), and quality-control measures such as IRB review and pilot testing.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective literature synthesis as a basis for hypothesis formation. Rather than simply summarizing prior research, the author critically notes its limitations — such as single-university sampling and the absence of comparison groups — and uses those limitations to justify a more rigorous and broadly comparative design. This technique shows how a literature review can directly motivate and shape a new study's methodology.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a review of existing evidence on financial illiteracy across demographic groups, narrows its focus to the underexplored college student population, states two testable hypotheses, and then details a comprehensive methodology for testing them. The conclusion briefly justifies the chosen design over a longitudinal alternative. The structure follows the conventional research proposal format: problem statement → gap identification → hypotheses → methods.
The Problem of Financial Illiteracy
Research consistently shows that high school students receive inadequate education in financial literacy (NAEP, 1979). Mandell (1997), for instance, reports that high school students score an average of 57% on assessments covering money management, savings and investment, spending, and other areas of personal income. High school graduates, in other words, demonstrate weak financial literacy overall.
Adults are similarly deficient, particularly regarding retirement planning and investment decision-making. A study of 552 adult women found that 56% were ignorant of the fundamentals of investing (Chen & Volpe, 1998). A further study found that most Americans fail to save adequately for retirement or for emergencies, often possessing a false sense of confidence about their future financial security. About 71% of all workers and 81% of retirees in that study scored 60% or less on assessments of financial knowledge.
In the same review, Chen and Volpe (1998) reported that the Institute of Certified Financial Planners (1993) surveyed 123 Certified Financial Planner licensees and found that financial illiteracy was a major problem in financial decision-making. Investors consistently lack a solid grounding in financial issues, and many workers perform poorly on basic financial knowledge assessments.
Financial Literacy Among College Students
Most studies focus on financial literacy among high school students and adults, but few — if any — investigate the level of financial literacy among college students. One of the few studies to do so is that of Danes and Hira (1987), who surveyed 323 college students from a single university, assessing their knowledge of insurance, credit card management, record keeping, personal loans, and general financial management. They found that financial literacy was low among this group as well.
While informative, the Danes and Hira (1987) study suffered from important limitations. Their sample was drawn exclusively from one university, and their survey covered only a limited number of items. These limitations are compounded by the fact that the study did not compare its sample against a contrasting group — such as high school graduates — making it impossible to assess whether participants improved in financial literacy as a result of their college experiences, or whether financial literacy remained essentially unchanged between high school students and college graduates.
Research Questions and Hypotheses
What this study seeks to investigate, therefore, is whether college students have a better grasp of financial literacy than high school graduates do, and whether any such improvement is attributable to their college experiences. The central research question is: Is there any improvement in financial literacy between a non-college student and a post-college student?
Hypothesis 1:
Positive: A significant difference is found in the quality of financial literacy in a post-college student compared to a non-college student.
Negative: No significant difference is found in the quality of financial literacy in a post-college student compared to a non-college student.
Hypothesis 2:
Positive: College education is found to have a significant positive influence on the financial literacy of college students.
Negative: College education is found to have little or no significant positive influence on the financial literacy of college students.
Research Methodology and Design
This study will use a comprehensive questionnaire covering the main aspects of personal finance, including general financial knowledge, savings and borrowing, investments, and insurance. A total of 1,800 participants from 20 colleges and high schools distributed across 10 different states will be asked to answer 52 questions. These include 36 multiple-choice questions assessing knowledge of personal finance, eight questions on financial decisions and opinions, and eight questions related to demographic data. The survey will be pilot tested and reviewed by two independent experts in personal finance. The validity of the survey instrument will be assessed using Cronbach's alpha.
Following Chen and Volpe's (1998) method, responses from each participant will be used to calculate the mean percentage of correct scores for each question, each section, and the survey as a whole. Mean percentage scores will be grouped into three categories: (a) highest — more than 80%; (b) medium — 60%–79%; and (c) below 60%.
In order to achieve as demographically diverse a sample as possible, 900 graduating college students from at least 10 colleges will be surveyed, along with 900 graduating high school students from at least 10 different high schools. Colleges will be randomly selected from 10 different states, and high schools will likewise be randomly selected from the same 10 states. In both settings, students in their final year will be evaluated.
Socioeconomic, racial, and academic characteristics of the high schools will be matched to those of the universities in order to minimize confounding variables. An ANOVA will be used because multiple levels of comparison are involved, alongside a logistic regression model to test for the possibility of correlation.
To assess the extent to which financial literacy influences students' decisions, participants from both high schools and colleges will be asked to rank personal financial issues using five categories: very important, somewhat important, not sure, somewhat unimportant, and very unimportant. They will also be asked to make decisions on related financial issues.
Similarly, to evaluate the extent to which high school or college education influences the quality of financial literacy, students from both settings will be asked to rank additional personal financial issues using the same five-point scale, and will be asked how their education helped them make decisions on those financial issues.
Conclusion and Study Rationale
The alternative to this study's cross-sectional design would be a randomized longitudinal survey of high school students sampled before graduation, followed through their college years, and then surveyed again before completing college. The cross-sectional approach was chosen instead because it makes up for gaps in previous studies and allows for a direct contrast of high school and college students across a diverse range of institutions.
Quality and reliability will be ensured by matching the demographic characteristics of high schools to those of colleges. The survey will be pilot tested and reviewed by two independent experts in personal finance to ensure clarity, comprehension, and relevance. The study will also be processed through an Institutional Review Board (IRB) to screen for ethical concerns. All steps will be taken to eliminate interviewer and interviewee bias, and potential threats to internal and external validity will be identified and addressed throughout the research process.
References
Babbie, E. (1989). The Practice of Social Research (5th ed.). Wadsworth.
Chen, H., & Volpe, R. P. (1998). An analysis of personal financial literacy among college students. Financial Services Review, 7, 107–128.
Creswell, J. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
Danes, S. M., & Hira, T. K. (1987). Money management knowledge of college students. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 17, 4–16.
Mandell, L. (1997). Personal financial survey of high school seniors. Jump$tart Coalition, Washington, DC.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.