Flint Water Crisis: Leadership, Ethics, and Public Health
This paper analyzes the Flint, Michigan water crisis, in which a cost-cutting decision to switch the city's water supply from Lake Huron to the Flint River resulted in widespread lead contamination affecting nearly 100,000 residents. The paper traces the origins of the crisis, documents the timeline of government inaction, and examines the ethical failures of Michigan state leadership. Special attention is given to the disproportionate impact on poor and minority communities, the damning findings of university research, the measurable rise in children's blood lead levels, and the historical roots of environmental racism in Flint. A SWOT analysis and a leadership response plan are also presented.
- Introduction: What Brought On the Crisis?: Origins of Flint's contaminated water supply
- Ethics Issues: Leadership Ignored Warning Signs: State officials dismissed residents' health concerns
- Timeline of Citizen and Legal Responses: Chronology of key events and legal actions
- Racism and Ethical Roots of the Crisis: Racial and class dimensions of environmental injustice
- Research Findings: Health Impacts on Children: University studies and blood lead level data
- SWOT Analysis of the Crisis Response: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats
- Leadership Plan and Recommendations: Proposed public health and civic response actions
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Integrates multiple source types — peer-reviewed journal articles, investigative journalism, government reports, and university research — to build a multi-dimensional argument about government failure.
- Moves logically from factual background to ethical analysis to racial context to scientific evidence, creating a layered and persuasive case.
- The SWOT analysis adds a practical organizational framework that distinguishes this paper from purely descriptive crisis summaries, demonstrating applied analytical thinking.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of the chronological timeline as an argumentative device. By anchoring each event to a specific date, the author shows not just what happened but how long officials delayed action despite mounting evidence — making the ethical indictment concrete and difficult to dispute.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with background on Flint's demographics and the origins of the water crisis, then moves through an ethics section on ignored warning signs, a detailed timeline of legal and citizen responses, an examination of racial injustice, university research findings, impacts on children's health, a SWOT analysis of the crisis response, and closes with a practical leadership plan. This progression from cause to consequence to response is methodical and well-suited to the subject matter.
Introduction: What Brought On the Crisis?
The Flint River had previously served as the main source of drinking water in Flint for many years. In 1967, however, the city made arrangements to purchase higher-quality water from Lake Huron through the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department (CNN, 2016). After Flint made that transition, the Flint River was slowly degraded by pollution. Because of "the presence of fecal coliform bacteria, low dissolved oxygen, plant nutrients, oils, and toxic substances," the state ordered that approximately 134 specific sites along the river be cleaned up (CNN, 2016). In addition to those pollutants, the watershed feeding into the Flint River was contributing pesticides and fertilizer residue from farms, as well as waste from industrial complexes.
Meanwhile, by 2014 the budget funding Flint's water supply was $9 million in arrears, because some water-fund revenue had been used to cover shortages in Flint's general fund. An emergency loan was floated to cover the water supply fund. In order to relieve pressure on the water fund — and while a new pipeline from Lake Huron was under construction, which would reportedly save the city over $200 million over 25 years (Kennedy, 2016) — Michigan's leadership made an apparent economic stopgap decision and switched sources, tapping into the Flint River. A class-action lawsuit later alleged that the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality did not treat the Flint River water with an anti-corrosive agent, which is a violation of federal law (CNN, 2016). Indeed, the river water was found to be "19 times more corrosive" than Lake Huron water, and old service pipelines allowed lead to leach into Flint homes in 2014 (CNN, 2016).
What are the health impacts of high levels of lead in drinking water? Children suffer from "impaired cognition, behavioral disorders, hearing problems and delayed puberty" (CNN, 2016). For pregnant women, lead reduces fetal growth, and for the general population, consuming water with substantial levels of lead can negatively impact the heart, the nerves, and the kidneys (CNN, 2016).
Ethics Issues: Leadership Ignored Warning Signs
Journalist Julie Bosman, writing in The New York Times, explains how the subjects of low income and minority membership in the community came into focus. An independent five-member panel referenced by Bosman reported that "disregard for the concerns of poor and minority people" was one reason the government was slow to respond to complaints from residents about the "foul and discolored water" that was making people sick (Bosman, 2016). The panel, established by Governor Rick Snyder in October 2015, reported that the water crisis was "a story of government failure, intransigence, unpreparedness, delay, inaction and environmental injustice" (Bosman, 2016, p. 1).
At the same time the panel was authorized, Snyder urged Flint citizens to avoid drinking river water, and also in October 2015 he blamed state employees for the crisis. He specifically pointed to: (a) state-appointed emergency managers, who "prized frugality over public safety"; and (b) staff members in the governor's office (Bosman, 2016, p. 1). Notwithstanding Snyder's finger-pointing, the panel focused on the fact that minorities and the poor are "treated differently when it comes to environmental matters" (Bosman, 2016, p. 2). Community members in Flint "did not enjoy the same degree of protection from environmental and health hazards" that wealthier communities receive (Bosman, 2016, p. 2).
The panel's 116-page report also noted that the failure to add necessary chemicals to the water — in order to retard corrosion in the pipes, which was the source of lead contamination — was a decision based on saving money for the state (Bosman, 2016, p. 3).
Timeline of Citizen and Legal Responses
The following timeline illustrates how events unfolded and how citizens and legal bodies responded to the crisis:
April 25, 2014: The Flint River begins flowing into families' faucets. A press release from the City states: "In an effort to dispel myths and promote the truth about the Flint River … numerous studies and tests [have been made] … the quality of water being put out meets all of our drinking water standards and Flint water is safe to drink" (Kennedy, 2016).
August 2014: The city issues a boil-water order after detecting coliform bacteria; additional chlorine is pumped into the water (CNN, 2016).
October 2014: The General Motors plant in Flint stops using city water and arranges to use water from Lake Huron instead (CNN, 2016).
January 2, 2015: Flint is declared to be in violation of the Safe Drinking Water Act because the level of total trihalomethanes — carcinogens according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — are present in the water (Kennedy, 2016).
January 2015: The city issues a warning that "byproducts of disinfectants" in the water can cause health issues, including cancer (CNN, 2016).
January 21, 2015: The Detroit Free Press reports that children are developing rashes and "suffering from mysterious illnesses" (CNN, 2016).
March 23, 2015: The Flint City Council votes 7–1 to halt the use of river water, but the Council is overruled by state emergency manager Jerry Ambrose, who calls the vote "incomprehensible" due to the high costs involved.
January 2016: (a) A federal lawsuit is filed against the state; and (b) the EPA launches a criminal investigation (CNN, 2016).
March 2016: Lawyers for the NAACP file a class-action suit against Michigan and Governor Snyder.
April 2016: Criminal charges are filed against Michigan officials (CNN, 2016).
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.