Flint Water Crisis: SWOT Analysis and Solutions
This paper examines the Flint, Michigan water crisis that emerged in 2014, when the city switched its drinking water source to the Flint River, resulting in widespread lead contamination. The paper provides background on Flint's socioeconomic conditions and the financial emergency that prompted the water source switch. It applies a SWOT framework to the crisis, identifying accountability failures under New Public Management, regulatory neglect by the EPA and state agencies, and long-term infrastructure threats. The paper also addresses the ethical dimensions of official inaction and explores solutions including federal funding proposals, innovative lead-pipe replacement technology, whole-house filtration systems, and progressive infrastructure budgeting as pathways to restoring safe water and public trust.
- Introduction and Background: Flint's demographics, economic decline, and water switch
- Concepts and Challenges: New Public Management: Accountability gaps under New Public Management framework
- SWOT Analysis of the Flint Water Crisis: Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats identified
- Ethical Failures and Government Accountability: Official inaction, delayed response, and engineering negligence
- Solutions and Recommendations: Funding proposals, pipe technology, and filtration innovations
- Conclusion: Flint as part of a national infrastructure crisis pattern
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Applies a concrete analytical framework (SWOT) to a real-world public health crisis, giving structure to a complex, multi-actor event.
- Integrates socioeconomic context — household income data, demographic statistics, and the city's industrial decline — to ground the analysis in material conditions rather than abstract policy discussion.
- Balances descriptive reporting of the crisis with normative ethical analysis, making the argument that fiscal concerns cannot legally or morally override citizen safety.
- Moves from diagnosis to prescription, dedicating substantial space to concrete technological and legislative solutions rather than stopping at critique.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied policy analysis through structured framework use: a SWOT matrix organizes disparate facts — regulatory failures, funding gaps, ethical lapses, and corrective opportunities — into a coherent evaluative argument. This technique is particularly useful in public administration writing because it forces the writer to weigh both internal organizational factors (weaknesses, strengths) and external environmental ones (threats, opportunities) simultaneously.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with socioeconomic background before moving to conceptual challenges under New Public Management. The SWOT section addresses each quadrant in turn, with the Threats section receiving the most developed treatment. An ethics section then evaluates governmental and engineering responsibility. The solutions section pivots to federal funding proposals, pipe-replacement technology, and whole-house filtration systems, before a brief conclusion that situates Flint within a broader national pattern of infrastructure neglect.
Introduction and Background
This paper examines the widely publicized water crisis in Flint, Michigan, which first emerged in 2014. Specifically, it addresses associated challenges and concepts, a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis of the issue, and solutions and recommendations for resolving it.
Situated about 70 miles north of Detroit — Michigan's largest city — Flint is home to approximately 98,310 residents, of whom an alarming 41.6% are classified as economically underprivileged. United States Census Bureau estimates reveal that the average household income of the city's residents is around $24,679, while the state average stands at $49,087. Over half (56.6%) of the city's residents belong to the African-American ethnic group. At one time, Flint headquartered the largest General Motors manufacturing facility in America. The city suffered an economic downturn in the 1980s when the company decided to downsize this expansive industrial unit. The state government assumed responsibility for the city's finances in 2011 following an audit that estimated a deficit of twenty-five million dollars.
Despite the city's water supply finances reflecting a deficit of nine million dollars, some funds were being used by officials to cover general fund deficits. Insolvency came to an end in April 2015 with the clearance of the deficit through an emergency loan, at which point the funds allocated for the city's water were declared solvent. To reduce the water fund deficit, Flint decided to switch its water source in 2014. Although construction of a new pipeline connecting Lake Huron to the city of Flint was underway, city officials decided to use river water as an interim source during the transition period.
The waters of the Flint River downstream of the city had previously been proven to be of poor quality. They were severely degraded in the 1970s due to the presence of toxins including lead, fecal coliform, oil, low levels of dissolved oxygen, and excess plant nutrients. Children's exposure to lead produces the following health impacts: impaired cognition, delayed puberty, behavioral issues, and hearing problems. In expectant mothers, lead has been proven to reduce fetal growth. For the general population, consumption of lead-contaminated water damages nerves, the heart, and the kidneys.
Concepts and Challenges: New Public Management
Among the chief criticisms of the New Public Management concept is that, because public officials and emergency managers are not bound by regular democratic oversight, accountability becomes muddled. Accountability demands have surfaced in Flint, with the public holding the governor, the Department of Environmental Quality, and emergency managers as the chief blameworthy parties.
New Public Management's most problematic characteristic in the context of the Flint Water Crisis is the notion that a citizen is a consumer. This management approach perceives the government as flexible and responsive to citizens' requirements and demands insofar as they pay for commodities; hence, the chief executive's actions are considered crucial to meeting consumer needs and market forces. Contrary to this assumption, however, citizens cannot be equated with consumers, and water is not a commodity.
SWOT Analysis of the Flint Water Crisis
Strengths
Not many strengths can be identified with respect to the water crisis in Flint, Michigan.
Weaknesses
A financial emergency was declared in Flint in 2011, leading to the state's assumption of the city's budgetary control function. As verified by state authorities, every decision made during Flint's water crisis was made not by the city's mayor or council, but by state authorities. Congress member Dan Kildee from Michigan stated that when an emergency finance manager was appointed by the governor in 2011, the position's sole responsibility was to achieve budget reductions at all costs. According to Kildee, Flint's water crisis reflects a broader attitude toward industrial cities like Flint that, over the past three decades, have experienced severe hardship — cities that are, in his view, simply forgotten (Ganim and Tran, 2016).
The federal EPA and the Michigan Attorney General have been investigating why the state neglected federal regulations and chose to forgo the use of anti-corrosive treatment, as argued in the lawsuit. According to Karen Weaver, Mayor of Flint, this question remains unanswered.
Opportunities
No major opportunities can be identified with regard to the water crisis in Flint, Michigan.
Threats
The EPA warned Michigan state authorities and Flint city officials that the city faces a number of long-term water supply threats, despite short-term efforts to reduce lead concentrations in its drinking water. The substandard quality of the water supply grew into a city-wide crisis when, after months of complaints by residents of this predominantly African-American and impoverished city, authorities acknowledged the problem and began seeking corrective measures.
EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy identified no fewer than five areas requiring additional focus and funding to ensure a sustainable, safe potable water supply, outlined in an official letter addressed to Michigan Governor Rick Snyder and Mayor Weaver. McCarthy noted that while immediate efforts had produced encouraging signs, significant long-term challenges persisted — including the need for additional financing, a long-term water source decision for the city, and competent city administration. The letter further noted that Flint's water treatment facility suffered a staff shortage, coupled with an oversized distribution system that reduces the effectiveness of the chlorine used to treat pathogens. The Flint River's water proved more corrosive than Detroit's system water, causing more lead to leach from old pipes. Lead has well-documented toxic effects, and child consumers are particularly at risk. Mayor Weaver accepted several of the EPA's conclusions and stated that compliance would require additional state funding, along with new infrastructure and pipelines — costs she argued the state should bear.
Conclusion
Flint is not the only community in the nation suffering from a polluted water supply, nor does this constitute the only kind of human-made crisis America has encountered. The 1989 Exxon Valdez oil tanker spill and other such disasters offer important lessons. No one should continue to suffer once an environmental and public health crisis has been identified. Prompt, accountable, and adequately funded responses are a moral and governmental imperative.
References
Bastasch, M. (2016). EPA named in blistering report on Flint water crisis. The Daily Caller. Retrieved October 13, 2016, from http://dailycaller.com/2016/03/24/epa-named-in-blistering-report-on-flint-water-crisis/
Botelho. (2016). Flint water crisis: City gets $28 million in state aid. CNN. Retrieved October 13, 2016, from http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/29/us/flint-michigan-water-crisis/
EPA warns Flint, Michigan of long-term threats to water supply. (2016). Reuters. Retrieved October 13, 2016, from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-michigan-water-idUSKCN0Z32E8
Flint water crisis fast facts. (2016, October 4). CNN. Retrieved October 12, 2016, from http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/04/us/flint-water-crisis-fast-facts/
Flint, MI water crisis is proof positive that we need better infrastructure and a progressive budget. (n.d.). Daily Kos. Retrieved October 13, 2016, from
Engineering ethics blog: Dereliction of duty: The Flint water crisis. (2016). Engineering Ethics Blog. Retrieved October 13, 2016, from http://engineeringethicsblog.blogspot.com/2016/02/dereliction-of-duty-flint-water-crisis.html
Ganim, S., & Tran, L. (2016). How Flint, Michigan's tap water became toxic. CNN. Retrieved October 13, 2016, from http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/11/health/toxic-tap-water-flint-michigan/
The IBEW's innovative solution to Flint's water crisis. (2016, February 25). IBEW. Retrieved October 13, 2016, from
Flint, lead and public administration's failure. (2016, February 4). It Ain't Necessarily So. Retrieved October 12, 2016, from http://www.itaintnecessarilyso.org/articles/2016/2/1/flint-lead-and-public-administrations-failure
Meloni, R. (2016). Flint water crisis: A major breakthrough. ClickOnDetroit. Retrieved October 13, 2016, from http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/flint-water-crisis/flint-water-crisis-a-major-breakthrough
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.