Freshman Representation in University Student Government
This paper examines the limited political power afforded to freshmen in university student government, arguing that structural and cultural norms marginalize the newest class of students despite the fact that student government decisions affect all students for four years. Drawing on standpoint theory and the cultural approach to organizations, the paper identifies how entrenched tradition sustains a freshman "subclass" within the government's hierarchy. Two possible reforms are evaluated: full immediate inclusion of freshmen and a compromise phased approach. The paper recommends the phased solution, in which freshmen transition from a learning role to full participation midway through their first year, balancing the need for experience with the need for equitable representation.
- The Problem: Freshman Exclusion from Student Government: Freshmen lack voice in decisions affecting all students
- Theoretical Framework: Standpoint Theory and Organizational Culture: Standpoint theory and tradition explain entrenched hierarchy
- Proposed Solutions: Two reform options with trade-offs evaluated
- Recommendation and Conclusion: Phased inclusion balances experience and representation
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Applies two specific communication theories — standpoint theory and the cultural approach to organizations — to a concrete campus governance problem, grounding the analysis in an academic framework.
- Presents a balanced evaluation of multiple solutions before committing to a recommendation, demonstrating critical thinking rather than advocacy from the outset.
- The final recommendation is nuanced, acknowledging the legitimate reasons behind the existing tradition while still arguing for meaningful reform.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied theory analysis: it identifies a real institutional problem, names the theoretical lenses best suited to explain it, and uses those lenses to evaluate practical solutions. This technique — moving from theory to diagnosis to recommendation — is a core skill in communications and social science coursework.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by defining the problem and its stakeholders, then introduces the theoretical frameworks that explain why the problem persists. It proceeds to outline two distinct reform options with explicit pros and cons for each, and closes with a justified recommendation that synthesizes practical and cultural considerations. The argument flows logically from problem identification through analysis to actionable conclusion.
The Problem: Freshman Exclusion from Student Government
Freshmen generally have little say in the student government at the university level. They are essentially redshirted — stuck in a learning role and unable to exert any political power. This problem is caused by higher representatives of the student government, who have the capacity to change the system but do not attempt to do so. The policy directly affects the freshman class, leaving them with very little input into the governing body. Because the issues that student government addresses will affect freshmen for four years, their lack of input is not merely a problem for incoming students but a concern for the entire student body.
Theoretical Framework: Standpoint Theory and Organizational Culture
The most important communication theory for explaining this situation is standpoint theory. Upperclassmen maintain a stratified social structure that places freshmen at the bottom. There is no practical justification for this arrangement beyond the low social standing assigned to new students. Furthermore, this low social standing has become embedded in the organizational culture of the student government, which reflects the cultural approach to organizations. Tradition within an organization is difficult to break. Even when a practice makes little functional sense, its status as tradition makes it far more entrenched than would otherwise be justified.
Proposed Solutions
There are two possible solutions worth considering. The first is to bring freshmen into student government fully and immediately. The primary advantage of this approach is that it would give freshmen direct representation from the start of the academic year. The main disadvantage, however, is that it would place inexperienced students in positions of authority for which they may not be adequately prepared. Additionally, the support tasks that freshmen currently perform would need to be reassigned to others.
The second possible solution is a compromise. Under this plan, freshmen who currently spend their entire first year performing menial tasks would do so only for the first semester. Beginning in the second semester, they would transition into full participation in student government. The advantages of this approach are significant: the freshman class would gain representation partway through the year, and that representation would come from members who have already accumulated a semester's worth of experience. The student government would benefit from fresh perspectives while avoiding the risks of placing completely untrained students in decision-making roles immediately. The downside is that this plan still perpetuates the notion of a freshman subclass during the first semester, and the potential for exploitation of freshmen during that period would remain a concern.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.