Essay Undergraduate 946 words

Global Warming: Natural Causes and Mitigation Strategies

~5 min read
Abstract

This paper examines the causes and mitigation of global warming, distinguishing between natural and anthropogenic sources of greenhouse gas emissions. It reviews the scientific consensus that human activities are responsible for more than 90% of recent warming trends, while also acknowledging dissenting views on the relative scale of natural versus manmade emissions. The paper evaluates two mitigation approaches — government-mandated emissions reductions and a market-driven adaptive response — and considers which industries and nations face the greatest responsibility for policy reform. It concludes that a combination of renewable energy adoption and timely climate adaptation may represent the most realistic path forward.

Key Takeaways
  • Introduction: Overview of global warming debate and paper scope
  • Natural and Manmade Sources of Climate Change: Compares natural versus anthropogenic greenhouse gas sources
  • Two Approaches to Mitigation: Government regulation vs. market-driven climate response
  • Policy Changes and Affected Sectors: Renewable energy policies and high-impact industries
  • Conclusion: Synthesis of causes debate and adaptive policy recommendation
Greenhouse Gases Anthropogenic Warming Fossil Fuels Kyoto Protocol Renewable Energy Climate Mitigation Carbon Dioxide Market Adaptation Emissions Regulation Climate Policy

This study guide is drawn from PaperDue's library of 130,000+ paper examples across 47 subjects.

📝 How to Write This Type of Paper Writing guide — click to expand

What makes this paper effective

  • Balances the dominant scientific consensus with a dissenting perspective (Easterbrook), demonstrating awareness of the full scholarly debate rather than presenting a one-sided argument.
  • Moves logically from cause to mitigation to policy, giving the paper a clear, structured progression that guides the reader through increasingly applied territory.
  • Grounds abstract policy arguments in concrete examples, such as Israel's solar water-heater mandates and the BRIC nations' growing energy demands, making recommendations more persuasive.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper uses a compare-and-contrast structure to evaluate competing mitigation strategies — government regulation versus a market-driven "invisible hand" approach — and applies a short-term vs. long-term effectiveness framework to assess their respective merits. This technique allows the writer to acknowledge trade-offs rather than advocating simplistically for one option.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with a brief introduction that previews all major sections. The body is divided into two functional parts: the first addresses the science of climate change (natural vs. anthropogenic sources), and the second shifts to applied policy (mitigation strategies and sector-level recommendations). The conclusion synthesizes the debate and offers a pragmatic final position. The structure is transparent and follows a standard academic essay format appropriate for an undergraduate environmental science or policy course.

Introduction

There is a growing consensus among the scientific community that global warming is a reality that threatens the Earth's climate in ways that will be devastating to mankind. Many analysts believe that action must be taken to mitigate the effects of global warming before it is too late to stop the process. This paper provides a discussion of natural and manmade sources of climate change, a personal opinion concerning whether global warming is real, and an assessment of two mitigation strategies that have been proposed. Finally, it offers a speculation on what policy changes would help stabilize the global climate and which business sectors or nations should be held to stricter standards, followed by a summary of key findings in the conclusion.

Natural and Manmade Sources of Climate Change

Greenhouse gas emissions are widely recognized as causes of global warming (Clark & Lee, 2004). Many members of the scientific community believe that greenhouse gas levels must be significantly reduced below existing levels, as mandated for developed nations by the Kyoto Protocol (Clark & Lee, 2004). Although manmade carbon dioxide from fossil fuel combustion is frequently cited as the main source of greenhouse gases (Allen, Seaman & DeLascio, 2009), natural water vapor is actually the most abundant greenhouse gas, and naturally occurring methane is also a major contributor (A Blanket Around the Earth, 2013). Although most authorities agree that increased manmade activities are the primary source of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide, not all authorities agree that global warming is anthropogenic in origin. Indeed, according to Easterbrook, "The human role in carbon dioxide discharges is modest compared to nature's. Naturally occurring carbon emissions outnumber human-caused emissions roughly 29 to one" (1995, p. 312).

Irrespective of its origins, however, there is mounting evidence that the Earth is growing warmer, sea levels are rising, the polar ice caps are melting, and that anthropogenic activity is the primary contributing cause (Allen et al., 2009). Researchers at NASA conclude that there is "a more than 90% probability that human activities over the past 250 years have warmed our planet" (A Blanket Around the Earth, 2013, para. 3).

Two Approaches to Mitigation

Two potential approaches to global warming mitigation have been advanced. The first approach involves the government promulgating new regulations that would require substantial reductions in greenhouse gas emissions (Clark & Lee, 2004). This alternative would require direct government action and oversight (Clark & Lee, 2004). The other approach that has been offered as a solution to global warming is to allow the most efficient response to any actual changes in the climate as they occur, rather than taking preventive action in advance (Clark & Lee, 2004). This "invisible hand" approach provides a framework in which mitigation efforts can proceed most efficiently without government interference (Clark & Lee, 2004). While the first alternative would likely be more effective in reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the short term, the latter approach would provide the best long-term solution by reducing overall reliance on fossil fuels (Clark & Lee, 2004).

1 Locked Section · 185 words remaining
Sign up to read this section

Policy Changes and Affected Sectors · 185 words

"Renewable energy policies and high-impact industries"

Conclusion

The contribution of anthropogenic greenhouse gases to climate change remains a matter of debate, with some researchers arguing that natural sources of greenhouse gas far outweigh mankind's contribution even at its worst, while others maintain that increased fossil fuel combustion since the Industrial Revolution has been the primary cause. It is hard to argue with the facts, however: the Earth has become warmer, the polar ice caps are melting, and sea levels are rising. These indisputable trends suggest that while nature contributes its fair share of greenhouse gases, manmade sources have exacerbated any climate change that was already taking place. In the final analysis, given the inexorability of these trends, providing timely responses to the effects of climate change may be the optimal solution.

You’re 63% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
Key Concepts in This Paper
Greenhouse Gases Anthropogenic Warming Fossil Fuels Kyoto Protocol Renewable Energy Climate Mitigation Carbon Dioxide Market Adaptation Emissions Regulation Climate Policy
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Global Warming: Natural Causes and Mitigation Strategies. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/global-warming-causes-mitigation-strategies-95013

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.