Google and the Balanced Scorecard: A Case Study
This paper examines Google as a case study in balanced scorecard management, drawing on Kaplan and Norton's four-step implementation framework. The paper analyzes how Google's strategy aligns financial, customer, internal business process, and knowledge and innovation metrics into a self-reinforcing competitive system. Topics covered include Google's key performance indicators across each scorecard category, how the company links its differentiation strategy to those metrics, its unconventional resource allocation practices (including the famous 10% personal-project policy), and its data-driven organizational culture. The analysis concludes that Google's approach closely mirrors balanced scorecard principles and produces a sustainable competitive advantage.
- Introduction to the Balanced Scorecard: Overview of balanced scorecard concept and Google's relevance
- Four Steps of Balanced Scorecard Implementation: Kaplan and Norton's four-step implementation framework explained
- Google's Metrics Across All Four Categories: Google's KPIs in financial, process, innovation, and customer areas
- Connecting Metrics to Strategy: How Google links differentiation strategy to scorecard metrics
- Strategic Budgeting and Resource Allocation: Google's unconventional resource allocation and 10% policy
- Metrics as Organizational Culture: Data-driven culture and organization-wide metric tracking at Google
- Conclusion: Google as a model balanced scorecard organization
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Consistently grounds each abstract balanced scorecard concept in a concrete Google example, making theoretical content immediately legible to readers unfamiliar with the framework.
- Follows the four-step Kaplan and Norton process as an organizing scaffold, giving the analysis a clear and logical sequence that mirrors real-world implementation.
- Identifies a positive feedback loop in Google's strategy — talent attracts innovation, innovation drives market share, market share funds talent — which is the paper's strongest analytical move.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied framework analysis: it takes an established theoretical model (the balanced scorecard) and systematically maps each component onto a real organization. Rather than describing Google in isolation or summarizing the scorecard abstractly, the writer uses each scorecard step as a lens to reveal why Google's practices succeed. This technique is common in business and strategy courses and shows the ability to translate theory into practical evaluation.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a conceptual introduction to the balanced scorecard and Google's relevance as a case study. It then moves through the four implementation steps — metrics identification, connecting metrics to strategy, strategic budgeting, and organization-wide metric tracking — devoting a section to each. Each section presents the theory, then applies it to Google. A brief conclusion synthesizes the argument and affirms Google as a model balanced scorecard organization. The structure is transparent and well-matched to the analytical task.
Introduction to the Balanced Scorecard
The balanced scorecard is a strategic management concept designed to achieve alignment among the diverse interests of an organization's stakeholders. The concept arises from the understanding that shareholders are just one of many stakeholder groups within any given organization. For an organization to sustain long-term success, it must be able to meet the needs of all critical stakeholders. The most effective strategy, therefore, creates a symbiosis between the interests of different stakeholder groups.
The balanced scorecard is an output-based perspective, with outputs organized into four categories: financial, internal business process, knowledge and innovation, and customer. This perspective stands in contrast to the traditional approach, which treats shareholder interests — that is, financial interests — as the only priority. Within the balanced scorecard framework, it is understood that financial interests are most effectively met when all other stakeholder interests are met as well.
Google is an example of an organization that excels at meeting the varied interests of its critical stakeholders. Google thus serves as a shining example of balanced scorecard-style management and makes an excellent case study for understanding the concepts that underlie this approach.
Four Steps of Balanced Scorecard Implementation
Kaplan and Norton (2000), the creators of the balanced scorecard, developed what they consider to be an optimal four-step process for implementing it within an organization. The four steps are: (1) monitor a variety of metrics, (2) connect those metrics to strategy, (3) develop a "strategic budget," and (4) involve the entire organization in tracking the metrics. Each of the four categories within the balanced scorecard should have dedicated metrics, and those metrics need to be aligned with the organization's overall strategy.
The strategic budget concept specifies that the organization should "authorize the initiatives necessary to attain scorecard targets" (Kaplan & Norton, 2000). Consistently measuring the metrics ensures that they play a valuable role in strategic control rather than existing merely as abstract targets.
References
Alexa.com (2015). Top 500 sites. Alexa.com. Retrieved March 22, 2015 from http://www.alexa.com/topsites
Andersen, E. (2014). How Google picks new employees. Forbes. Retrieved March 22, 2015 from http://www.forbes.com/sites/erikaandersen/2014/04/07/how-google-picks-new-employees-hint-its-not-about-your-degree/
BSI (2014). Balanced scorecard basics. Balanced Scorecard Institute. Retrieved March 22, 2015 from http://balancedscorecard.org/Resources/About-the-Balanced-Scorecard
eMarketer (2014). Google, Facebook continue on as the market's leaders. eMarketer.com. Retrieved March 22, 2015 from
Kaplan, R. & Norton, D. (2000). The balanced scorecard's lessons for managers. Harvard Management Update. In possession of the author.
Marr, B. (2012). Analytics at Google: Great example of data-driven decision making. Smart Data Collective. Retrieved March 22, 2015 from
MSN Moneycentral (2015). Google, Inc. Retrieved March 22, 2015 from http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/stockdetails?symbol=GOOG&ocid=qbeb
Reeves, M. & Deimler, M. (2011). Adaptability: The new competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved March 22, 2015 from https://hbr.org/2011/07/adaptability-the-new-competitive-advantage
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.