High Turnover in Public Administration: HRM Solutions
This paper examines the problem of high employee turnover in public administration and the challenges it poses for human resource management. Drawing on recent scholarly literature, it explores the key causes of turnover—including low wages, poor working conditions, inadequate benefits, job dissatisfaction, and weak organizational commitment—and discusses the significant financial, operational, and service-quality consequences that result. The paper then presents a range of practical solutions HRM professionals can implement, such as conducting exit interviews, offering competitive compensation, fostering professional development, and building inclusive workplace cultures. It concludes with targeted recommendations emphasizing skill utilization, feedback, communication, and trust-building between management and personnel as the most effective levers for reducing turnover and preventing the Great Resignation in the public sector.
- Introduction: Scope, thesis, and overview of turnover problem
- Background: Key Factors Affecting Turnover: Job satisfaction, conditions, and wages defined
- Importance of the Issue: Financial, morale, and service-quality consequences
- Causes of High Turnover in Public Administration: Complex interplay of satisfaction, pay, and culture
- Why High Turnover Challenges HR Management: Costs, morale impact, and risk of HR crisis
- Possible Solutions and Recommendations: Exit interviews, pay, development, trust, inclusion
- Creating Trust Between Management and Personnel: Communication, fairness, and inclusion build trust
- Conclusion: Holistic HRM approach needed to curb turnover
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its argument in a robust set of recent peer-reviewed sources, lending credibility to each claim about turnover causes and solutions.
- It moves logically from problem identification (background and importance) through cause analysis to concrete, numbered recommendations, giving the argument a clear applied focus.
- The inclusion of the "Great Resignation" as a framing device connects the academic discussion to a contemporary, widely recognized phenomenon, making the paper feel timely and relevant.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of synthesized literature review: rather than summarizing one source at a time, it groups multiple citations around shared themes (e.g., wages, working conditions, job satisfaction) to build cumulative support for each point. This shows readers how to use secondary sources as converging evidence rather than isolated quotations.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an abstract that previews all major themes, then moves through a standard research-paper structure: introduction (scope and thesis), background (conceptual definitions), importance, causes, challenges for HRM, solutions, a dedicated section on trust-building, and a synthesizing conclusion. The recommendations section is organized with numbered items, which improves readability and signals a practical, policy-oriented orientation typical of applied public administration writing.
Introduction
Turnover occurs at a high rate in public administration, especially among LGBT employees and among employees who have low job satisfaction in general (An, 2019; Ferreira & Neiva, 2018; Sabharwal et al., 2019; Stater & Stater, 2019). This is a problem because turnover is costly for any administration, as it leads to increased spending on hiring and recruiting, training, and staffing resources. HR management must address it before it worsens. As Ferreira and Neiva (2018) point out, one of the most important antecedents of turnover is job satisfaction. If employees are dissatisfied with their jobs, they are more likely to leave the organization. Another important factor is organizational commitment.
This paper discusses the background of the issue, its importance, possible solutions, and a recommendation that HRM in public administration can implement to reduce the risk of high turnover. It argues that the best way to reduce high rates of turnover in public administration is for HRM to address the issue of job satisfaction—which ultimately includes addressing workplace culture, leadership, wages, opportunities for growth, communication, and working conditions—otherwise, workers may abandon their jobs in what has become known as the Great Resignation.
Background: Key Factors Affecting Turnover
HR professionals typically have a wealth of knowledge about various factors that can affect employee turnover, including job satisfaction, working conditions, and wages (Hassan et al., 2019). These factors can all play a role in an employee's decision to remain with an organization or to seek employment elsewhere.
Job satisfaction refers to the extent to which an employee is happy and fulfilled in their role. If an employee is not satisfied with their job, they may be more likely to seek a new position (Azis et al., 2019; Hopkins & Figaro, 2021). HR professionals can help increase job satisfaction by ensuring that employees have the support and resources they need to do their jobs effectively and by providing opportunities for growth and development.
Working conditions are another important factor that can affect turnover. Employees who work in uncomfortable or unsafe environments may be more likely to look for a new job. HR professionals can help improve working conditions by addressing health and safety concerns and by ensuring that employees have access to the tools and equipment they need to perform their work well.
Wages are also a key factor influencing employee turnover. If employees feel they are not being paid a fair wage for the work they do, they may be more likely to seek a new job. HR professionals can help ensure fair compensation by staying current on market rates and by conducting regular salary reviews.
Overall, HR professionals play a critical role in retaining employees by understanding and addressing the factors that drive turnover. By staying informed about these issues and taking steps to resolve them, HR professionals can help create a positive and supportive work environment that promotes employee retention.
Importance of the Issue
High turnover in public administration can have a number of negative consequences. One of the most significant is the financial cost of hiring and training new employees to replace those who have left. This can be particularly challenging in the public sector, where budgets are often tight and resources available for training and development may be limited.
In addition to financial costs, high turnover can also negatively affect morale and productivity within an organization. When employees are constantly leaving, it creates instability and uncertainty, which can make it difficult for remaining employees to do their jobs effectively. This can lead to lower morale and reduced productivity, which can ultimately harm the organization as a whole.
Furthermore, high turnover can affect the quality of services provided to the public. When employees are constantly leaving, it becomes difficult for the organization to maintain high levels of expertise and institutional knowledge. This can result in a decline in service quality, which can negatively impact the people and communities the organization serves. In sum, the issue of high turnover in public administration is important because it carries a range of negative consequences—financial costs, reduced morale and productivity, and a decline in the quality of public services.
Causes of High Turnover in Public Administration
The causes of high turnover in public administration can be complex and varied. Common causes include job dissatisfaction, poor working conditions, and inadequate wages. In the public sector, where employees often have a strong sense of mission and purpose, job satisfaction can be particularly important in retaining talent. Research has shown, however, that job satisfaction is not always straightforwardly correlated with turnover rates. In some cases, employees who are dissatisfied with their jobs may be more likely to remain out of a sense of obligation or duty (An, 2019). Conversely, employees who are satisfied with their jobs may be more likely to leave if they feel their skills are not being used effectively or if they are not given opportunities to advance (Stater & Stater, 2019). As a result, it is difficult to make simple generalizations about how job satisfaction affects turnover. Nevertheless, research broadly supports the finding that job satisfaction correlates with turnover rates.
Working conditions also play a significant role. Employees working in uncomfortable or unsafe environments may be more likely to seek new employment. HR professionals can help improve working conditions by addressing health and safety concerns, providing adequate tools and equipment, and tackling cultural issues in the workplace that may prompt resignations (Linzer et al., 2022). Wages represent another key driver: if employees feel they are not receiving fair pay, they may look elsewhere for better compensation and work-life balance (Moreno et al., 2022). Workers also want to feel appreciated and supported by their managers (Mourtgos et al., 2022). HR professionals can help ensure fair pay by monitoring market rates and conducting regular salary reviews.
Conclusion
Giving employees more opportunities to use their skills can be an effective way to improve job satisfaction and reduce turnover. By providing employees with the support and resources they need to do their best work, HR professionals can help create a positive environment that promotes retention. Nonetheless, reducing high rates of turnover in public administration is a complex and challenging task. HR professionals must take a comprehensive approach that addresses a range of factors, including job satisfaction, workplace culture, leadership, wages, opportunities for growth, communication, and working conditions.
One of the key ways HR professionals can address job satisfaction is by ensuring that employees have the opportunity to use their skills and abilities in their everyday work. This can involve assigning challenging and interesting tasks that allow employees to draw on their unique talents. HR professionals can also improve job satisfaction by providing regular feedback and development opportunities, and by fostering a positive and inclusive work environment.
In addition to addressing job satisfaction, HR professionals must also focus on leadership quality, compensation, opportunities for career growth, communication, and working conditions. By tackling these issues holistically and creating a supportive work environment, HR professionals can help reduce turnover and improve employee retention in public administration.
Ultimately, the best way to reduce high rates of turnover in public administration is for HR professionals to take a comprehensive approach that addresses the full range of contributing factors. By focusing on employee retention strategies and the drivers of job satisfaction, HR professionals can help create a work environment that keeps talent engaged and reduces the risk of the Great Resignation.
References
An, S. H. (2019). Employee voluntary and involuntary turnover and organizational performance: Revisiting the hypothesis from classical public administration. International Public Management Journal, 22(3), 444–469.
Azis, E., Prasetio, A. P., & Utomo, K. H. (2019). Overcoming turnover intention problems: Direct–indirect model to identify the effect of perceived organizational support and job satisfaction in service-based organizations. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 17(3), 555–566.
Ferreira, P. C. G., & Neiva, E. R. (2018). Antecedents of turnover in federal public administration. RAUSP Management Journal, 53, 366–384.
Hassan, M., Jambulingam, M., Alam, M. N., & Islam, S. (2019). Redesigning the retention strategy against the emerging turnover of Generation Y: Revisiting the long-standing problems from the 20th to the 21st century. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 23(2), 1–16.
Hopkins, J. C., & Figaro, K. A. (2021). The great resignation: An argument for hybrid leadership. International Journal of Business and Management Research, 9(4), 393–400.
Linzer, M., Griffiths, E. P., & Feldman, M. D. (2022). Responding to the Great Resignation: Detoxify and rebuild the culture. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 1–2.
Moreno, A., Navarro, C., & Fuentes-Lara, C. (2022). Factors affecting turnover intentions among Millennial public relations professionals: The Latin American case. Public Relations Inquiry, 2046147X221081176.
Mourtgos, S. M., Adams, I. T., & Nix, J. (2022). Elevated police turnover following the summer of George Floyd protests: A synthetic control study. Criminology & Public Policy, 21(1), 9–33.
Reyes, A. C. S., Aquino, C. A., & Bueno, D. C. (2019). Why employees leave: Factors that stimulate resignation resulting in creative retention ideas. CC The Journal: A Multidisciplinary Research Review, 14, 15–24.
Robertson, M. B. (2021). Hindsight is 2020: Identifying missed leadership opportunities to reduce employee turnover intention amid the COVID-19 shutdown. Strategic HR Review, 20(6), 215–220.
Sabharwal, M., Levine, H., D'Agostino, M., & Nguyen, T. (2019). Inclusive work practices: Turnover intentions among LGBT employees of the US federal government. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(4), 482–494.
Stater, K. J., & Stater, M. (2019). Is it "just work"? The impact of work rewards on job satisfaction and turnover intent in the nonprofit, for-profit, and public sectors. The American Review of Public Administration, 49(4), 495–511.
Suryawan, I. G. R., Ardana, I. K., & Suwandana, I. G. M. (2021). Transformational leadership, work stress and turnover intention: The mediating role of job satisfaction. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSSR), 5(1), 146–157.
Tessema, M. T., Tesfom, G., Faircloth, M. A., Tesfagiorgis, M., & Teckle, P. (2022). The "Great Resignation": Causes, consequences, and creative HR management strategies. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 10(1), 161–178.
Tufvesson, A. (2021). The great resignation: Staying put. LSJ: Law Society of NSW Journal, (84), 34–37.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.