Historical Progress of African-Americans: 1865 to Present
This paper traces the historical progress of African-Americans across five chronological periods — 1865–1876, 1877–1920, 1921–1945, 1946–1976, and 1976 to the present — identifying one key theme of advancement within each era. Beginning with the economic and political dislocations of Reconstruction, the paper moves through the rise of Jim Crow segregation, the cultural flowering of the Harlem Renaissance, the civil rights struggles of the postwar decades, and the emergence of affirmative action. Each section demonstrates how the challenges and achievements of one period shaped the conditions of the next, building a cumulative narrative of progress amid persistent inequality.
- Introduction: Themes of African-American Progress: Overview of five chronological units and key themes
- Unit I (1865–1876): Reconstruction and Economic Transition: Post-Civil War economic struggles and black migration north
- Unit II (1877–1920): Jim Crow, Resistance, and Institution-Building: Jim Crow laws and rise of black civic institutions
- Unit III (1921–1945): The Harlem Renaissance and a Collective Voice: Cultural awakening and emergence of African-American arts
- Unit IV (1946–1976): Civil Rights and Legal Desegregation: Postwar civil rights struggle and landmark court rulings
- Unit V (1976–Present): Affirmative Action and Ongoing Disparity: Affirmative action as remedy for persistent inequality
- Conclusion: Cumulative narrative of African-American historical progress
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper uses a consistent analytical framework — identifying one issue, one response, and one outcome per time period — which gives a loosely structured survey clear internal logic.
- It integrates primary legal sources (Plessy v. Ferguson, McLaurin v. Oklahoma, Brown v. Board of Education) alongside secondary scholarship, lending evidentiary weight to historical claims.
- Transitions between units explicitly connect each period's legacy to the next, reinforcing the thesis that African-American progress is cumulative rather than episodic.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of periodization as an analytical tool. Rather than narrating events in a continuous chronology, it groups history into thematic units and extracts a dominant thread — economic, political, literary, or social — from each. This technique allows a wide historical span to be surveyed economically while still supporting argumentation about causation and continuity.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a framing introduction that maps the five units and the overarching thesis. Each body section follows a parallel structure: a named period, a key challenge, the community response, and the resulting outcome. The conclusion draws the units together and restates the cumulative nature of the progress described. This five-unit body with bracketing introduction and conclusion is well-suited to survey-style history essays at the undergraduate level.
Introduction: Themes of African-American Progress
The historical progress of African-Americans has been marked by both significant achievements and persistent obstacles. As seen across five chronological units — Unit I: 1865–1876, Unit II: 1877–1920, Unit III: 1921–1945, Unit IV: 1946–1976, and Unit V: 1976 to the present — consistent themes of political, economic, social, cultural, and literary progress emerge in each period and collectively account for where African-American culture stands today. This paper addresses one of these themes in each unit and discusses how each period led into the next in a continuous, if uneven, system of progress.
Unit I (1865–1876): Reconstruction and Economic Transition
During the period between the close of the Civil War in 1865 and 1876, life for African-Americans reflected a transitional reformation era. One economic challenge they faced was the need to develop ways to make a living, starting from the experience they had known only as enslaved people. In response, many chose during this period to resettle in areas where economic opportunities were greater. The outcome was a significant influx of African-American migration to the North.
It is the habit of many to think of history as a progression of linear events demarcated by specific dates and times. Though this is hardly the case, the need to simplify information for those who did not live through the events means history is often written this way. For this reason, many people overlook the post-war struggles to redefine institutions — and, in the case of the Civil War, an entire traditional society. The era following the Civil War was by no means a smooth transition from a slave-owning to a free-black society, nor was it free of conflict over the needs of Southern states in the reconstruction of their ruined lands and fragmented social and political order (Golay, 1999, p. 262).
This period is significantly important to subsequent African-American history because, on a social and political level, it exemplified taking one step forward and two steps back. It enabled later periods of de facto segregation and daily prejudice to proceed, yet it also marked the beginning of a constitutional effort to secure freedmen's rights equal to those of white men. The Black Codes — eventually and popularly renamed the Jim Crow Laws — allowed for officially sanctioned freedoms alongside restrictions that created legal segregation across much of the South and reinforced similar conditions already existing in the North ("Reconstruction," 2004).
Like many other political periods in American history, the fight for freedmen's rights was shaped by two opposing forces: on one side, the demand to preserve traditional prejudices, and on the other, the right of freed Black people to opportunity equal to that of whites ("Reconstruction," 2004). The period was further characterized by deprivation, as the devastation of the war on the South was substantial and obtaining even basic necessities was a daily concern — particularly for newly freed Black people. Federal military occupation of the Southern states added another layer of instability. Constitutional changes for freed Black Americans occurred, but not without a fight and not without regional adoption of "protective" measures for fearful whites ("Reconstruction," 2004).
References
Golay, M. (1999). A Ruined Land: The End of the Civil War. New York: Wiley.
Jonas, G. (2005). Freedom's Sword: The NAACP and the Struggle against Racism in America, 1909–1969. New York: Routledge.
Jim Crow Laws. (2004). In The Columbia Encyclopedia (6th ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Kivel, P. (1995). Uprooting Racism: How White People Can Work for Racial Justice. New York: New Society Publishers.
Klarman, M. J. (2004). From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, T. (2005, December 9). DOJ threatens lawsuit over Southern Illinois University's affirmative action program. civilrights.org.
Reconstruction. (2004). In The Columbia Encyclopedia (6th ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Ripley, C. P., Finkenbine, R. E., Hembree, M. F., & Yacovone, D. (Eds.). (1993). Witness for Freedom: African-American Voices on Race, Slavery, and Emancipation. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents (1950).
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.