Skip to main content
Essay Undergraduate 1,263 words

Human Rights in Business Ethics: Labor, Globalization

~7 min read 6 sections Ethics · Business Ethics
Abstract

This essay examines the role of human rights within the study of business ethics, with particular attention to labor standards in a globalized economy. It traces the historical evolution of labor rights from the industrial revolution in the United States to contemporary violations in developing economies, using Nike's well-documented sweatshop practices as a central case study. The paper argues that standardized global human rights frameworks level the competitive playing field for businesses while protecting vulnerable populations — especially women and children — from exploitation. It also connects human rights to environmental sustainability through ESG standards, concluding that ethical business operations benefit governments, individuals, and corporations alike.

Key Takeaways
  • Introduction: Human Rights and the Business Environment: Human rights as essential standards in global business
  • The Role of Labor in Societal Prosperity: Labor as foundation of economic and social wellbeing
  • Historical Context: Labor Rights and the Industrial Revolution: Early American labor conditions and regulatory evolution
  • Parallels Between Historical and Contemporary Labor Exploitation: Similarities between U.S. history and modern violations
  • Ethical Benefits of Human Rights for Business and Society: ESG, sustainability, and business case for human rights
  • Conclusion: Global standards as model for ethical operations
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples

What makes this paper effective

  • Uses a concrete, well-known case study (Nike's sweatshop practices) to ground abstract ethical arguments in observable real-world behavior, making the argument accessible and persuasive.
  • Draws a historical parallel between labor conditions during the American industrial revolution and contemporary violations in developing economies, lending analytical depth to the argument.
  • Broadens the human rights discussion beyond labor to include environmental sustainability and ESG considerations, demonstrating awareness of how the field has evolved.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper employs comparative historical analysis — juxtaposing labor conditions in early twentieth-century America with those in present-day developing economies — to argue that exploitation is not culturally inevitable but rather a product of inadequate legal frameworks. This technique strengthens the normative claim that universal human rights standards are both achievable and necessary.

Structure breakdown

The essay opens with a broad framing of human rights in the business context, introduces Nike as a focal case, then steps back to explain the foundational importance of labor to society. It next provides historical context through the American industrial revolution, draws explicit parallels to modern violations, and closes by extending the argument into environmental ethics and ESG standards before offering a brief conclusion. The structure moves from descriptive to analytical to normative, a common and effective pattern in applied ethics writing.

Essay 1,263 words

Introduction: Human Rights and the Business Environment

Human rights are an integral element within the business environment. Globalization has created a far more interconnected society that requires a common set of standards among businesses. These minimum standards first serve to level the playing field for businesses to operate on equal footing. More importantly, they help lift the overall prosperity of those in the labor class. The benefits of shared prosperity then ripple throughout society, improving the lives of all involved.

Without human rights protections, however, it is easy for businesses to exploit inefficiencies in the market. We have seen this with various international organizations where profitability pressures have caused them to exploit the prevailing market conditions within a given jurisdiction. Through efforts to improve profitability and shareholder returns, these companies have essentially disregarded their domestic human rights principles in favor of lower standards in foreign countries. To be fair, many of these instances are not illegal — companies were often legally exploiting the laws and regulations within a developing economy.

The most notorious example occurred with Nike and its exploitation of Asian women and children in its sweatshops. Workers — many of them women and children — labored for nearly sixteen hours a day at very low pay in deplorable conditions. These sweatshops offered little to no rest breaks, employee insurance, healthcare, or other benefits that workers in developed nations routinely expect. Even worse, the workers were subject to the supervision of male leaders who tended to exploit their dominance by physically and mentally abusing their subordinates during those long hours. Nike permitted these conditions as it leveraged cheap labor to increase profitability and profit margins. Many regarded this as a violation of basic human rights, even though the operations were completely legal in the countries where they occurred.

Having a globally standardized approach to human rights ultimately allows working conditions for poor families to improve while also helping to level the overall economic playing field on which international businesses operate. Through improvements in labor practices, all stakeholders — including governments, individuals, and businesses — can benefit (Alston, 2014).

The Role of Labor in Societal Prosperity

Labor is a critical element within the global environment and the basic building block of societal prosperity. Labor allows individuals to exchange their time and skills for money, which can then be used to purchase goods and services that improve their quality of life. The benefit of this system is that consumers can choose the goods and services they wish to consume. Some will take their earnings and save them for a future period; others will invest those sums and accept risk in hopes of consuming more later; still others will purchase cars, homes, and other comforts of life.

The ability to consume, however, is generally predicated on labor. Through the exchange of time for money, societies as a whole become more productive — their labor forces can produce more goods and services, which can in turn be consumed. This system benefits society through new products, benefits individuals through wages, and benefits governments through an expanded tax base that funds services such as infrastructure and education. Due to its foundational importance, labor is therefore a critical element within the human rights equation.

Historical Context: Labor Rights and the Industrial Revolution

Historically, human rights laws against the exploitation of labor were scarce. During the industrial revolution in the United States, for example, children as young as ten would work in coal plants, power plants, and on assembly lines. The typical work week varied widely, with many men working upwards of fifty to sixty hours; failure to comply could result in termination. Benefits such as health insurance were only just beginning to appear in employer packages, and concepts such as 401(k) retirement plans, paternity leave, or sabbaticals were nonexistent. Labor unions similarly lacked much power to negotiate wages and benefits on behalf of workers.

It was not until the reforms associated with the New Deal era — following the Great Depression — that labor unions, negotiated contracts, insurance coverage, shorter work weeks, and paid vacations became standard features of employment. These changes did not happen organically; they required an external political catalyst to force the reorientation of the relationship between employers and workers.

2 Sections Hidden · 430 words
Parallels Between Historical and Contemporary Labor Exploitation145 words
Ironically, the human rights violations that occurred during the American industrial revolution are very similar to those that have occurred in China and other developing economies. As noted above, Nike was exploiting the labor of women and…
Ethical Benefits of Human Rights for Business and Society285 words
From an ethical standpoint, human rights yield many prominent benefits. The benefits to disenfranchised individuals have been discussed above, but there…

Conclusion

Paying a livable wage, providing health insurance, and helping employees live a better life are basic human rights. Through meaningful advances in the rights discussed above, organizations can set a standard that serves as a global model for companies operating overseas. When businesses, governments, and individuals commit to a shared framework of human rights — one that encompasses labor protections, environmental sustainability, and the dignity of all workers — the resulting prosperity benefits every stakeholder involved.

References

Alston, Philip, and Frederic Megret, eds. The United Nations and Human Rights: A Critical Appraisal. Second Edition. Oxford University Press, 2014.

Key Concepts in This Paper
Human Rights Labor Standards Globalization Nike Sweatshops Child Labor ESG Standards Business Ethics Sustainable Operations Labor Exploitation Livable Wage
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Human Rights in Business Ethics: Labor, Globalization. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/human-rights-business-ethics-labor-globalization-2176804

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.