Human Rights in Business Ethics: Labor, Globalization
This essay examines the role of human rights within the study of business ethics, with particular attention to labor standards in a globalized economy. It traces the historical evolution of labor rights from the industrial revolution in the United States to contemporary violations in developing economies, using Nike's well-documented sweatshop practices as a central case study. The paper argues that standardized global human rights frameworks level the competitive playing field for businesses while protecting vulnerable populations — especially women and children — from exploitation. It also connects human rights to environmental sustainability through ESG standards, concluding that ethical business operations benefit governments, individuals, and corporations alike.
- Introduction: Human Rights and the Business Environment: Human rights as essential standards in global business
- The Role of Labor in Societal Prosperity: Labor as foundation of economic and social wellbeing
- Historical Context: Labor Rights and the Industrial Revolution: Early American labor conditions and regulatory evolution
- Parallels Between Historical and Contemporary Labor Exploitation: Similarities between U.S. history and modern violations
- Ethical Benefits of Human Rights for Business and Society: ESG, sustainability, and business case for human rights
- Conclusion: Global standards as model for ethical operations
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Uses a concrete, well-known case study (Nike's sweatshop practices) to ground abstract ethical arguments in observable real-world behavior, making the argument accessible and persuasive.
- Draws a historical parallel between labor conditions during the American industrial revolution and contemporary violations in developing economies, lending analytical depth to the argument.
- Broadens the human rights discussion beyond labor to include environmental sustainability and ESG considerations, demonstrating awareness of how the field has evolved.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper employs comparative historical analysis — juxtaposing labor conditions in early twentieth-century America with those in present-day developing economies — to argue that exploitation is not culturally inevitable but rather a product of inadequate legal frameworks. This technique strengthens the normative claim that universal human rights standards are both achievable and necessary.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with a broad framing of human rights in the business context, introduces Nike as a focal case, then steps back to explain the foundational importance of labor to society. It next provides historical context through the American industrial revolution, draws explicit parallels to modern violations, and closes by extending the argument into environmental ethics and ESG standards before offering a brief conclusion. The structure moves from descriptive to analytical to normative, a common and effective pattern in applied ethics writing.
Introduction: Human Rights and the Business Environment
Human rights are an integral element within the business environment. Globalization has created a far more interconnected society that requires a common set of standards among businesses. These minimum standards first serve to level the playing field for businesses to operate on equal footing. More importantly, they help lift the overall prosperity of those in the labor class. The benefits of shared prosperity then ripple throughout society, improving the lives of all involved.
Without human rights protections, however, it is easy for businesses to exploit inefficiencies in the market. We have seen this with various international organizations where profitability pressures have caused them to exploit the prevailing market conditions within a given jurisdiction. Through efforts to improve profitability and shareholder returns, these companies have essentially disregarded their domestic human rights principles in favor of lower standards in foreign countries. To be fair, many of these instances are not illegal — companies were often legally exploiting the laws and regulations within a developing economy.
The most notorious example occurred with Nike and its exploitation of Asian women and children in its sweatshops. Workers — many of them women and children — labored for nearly sixteen hours a day at very low pay in deplorable conditions. These sweatshops offered little to no rest breaks, employee insurance, healthcare, or other benefits that workers in developed nations routinely expect. Even worse, the workers were subject to the supervision of male leaders who tended to exploit their dominance by physically and mentally abusing their subordinates during those long hours. Nike permitted these conditions as it leveraged cheap labor to increase profitability and profit margins. Many regarded this as a violation of basic human rights, even though the operations were completely legal in the countries where they occurred.
Having a globally standardized approach to human rights ultimately allows working conditions for poor families to improve while also helping to level the overall economic playing field on which international businesses operate. Through improvements in labor practices, all stakeholders — including governments, individuals, and businesses — can benefit (Alston, 2014).
References
Alston, Philip, and Frederic Megret, eds. The United Nations and Human Rights: A Critical Appraisal. Second Edition. Oxford University Press, 2014.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.