Inclusive Education vs. Self-Contained Settings: Academic Outcomes
This paper examines the academic outcomes of students with disabilities educated in inclusive settings compared to those in self-contained special education programs. Drawing on multiple research studies spanning several decades, the paper reviews evidence on student achievement, teacher attitudes, and program implementation strategies. Studies by Freund and Wald, Pamela Cook, Debbie Staub, and Scruggs and Mastropieri are analyzed to assess the effectiveness of inclusion for both disabled and non-disabled students. The paper also addresses key challenges in implementing inclusive education, including teacher training and collaborative instructional approaches, and concludes with recommendations for moving toward more inclusive learning environments.
- Introduction: Limitations of secluded education and the inclusion debate
- Hypothesis and Significance: Research hypothesis and purpose of the study
- Main Issues in Inclusive Education: Key concerns and scope of inclusion programs
- Review of Literature: Four major studies on inclusion outcomes reviewed
- Successful Implementation of Inclusive Education: Teacher training and collaborative strategies for inclusion
- Conclusion: Final assessment of inclusion's benefits and challenges
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Synthesizes multiple research studies across different grade levels and countries to build a cumulative case for inclusive education, giving the argument empirical breadth.
- Balances perspectives by acknowledging limitations of inclusion — such as resource constraints and varying disability levels — rather than presenting a one-sided argument.
- Grounds abstract policy claims in specific quantitative data (e.g., BDI scores, GPA comparisons, teacher survey percentages), lending credibility to the overall argument.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the use of a literature review as an argumentative scaffold. Each cited study is not merely summarized but connected to a central claim — that inclusive education produces comparable or superior academic outcomes — allowing the research to function as cumulative evidence rather than isolated observations.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an introduction and hypothesis, then establishes the research's significance. A core literature review section covers four distinct studies (Freund & Wald; Cook et al.; Staub; Scruggs & Mastropieri), each addressing a different dimension of inclusion. An implementation section follows, discussing teacher preparation and collaborative methodology. The conclusion weighs two key considerations — disability severity and effects on non-disabled students — before affirming the case for inclusion.
Introduction
Educational institutions throughout the country are seriously considering inclusive education. There are serious limitations in the secluded education system. First, a specialized education system casts significant limitations on the disabled student. In the long run, when the student exits the protective environment of a secluded education system, he or she is not equipped with the skills needed to be successful in the broader world. In most cases, secluded education systems only shield the disabled student from the practical world rather than equipping him or her with the skills to hold a place in it.
While laws and court rulings have consistently supported the education of students within the least restrictive environment, there has not always been agreement as to what exactly that environment should look like for each child. There has been a great deal of debate regarding the benefits and drawbacks of both inclusive and self-contained education programs.
Hypothesis and Significance
It is hypothesized that students who are educated in an inclusive setting will achieve academically at the same rate as students who are educated in a self-contained special education setting.
The purpose of conducting this research is to gain clarity concerning the effectiveness of inclusion with regard to student achievement outcomes. The primary focus of this research project is to examine the academic achievement of students with disabilities who participate in inclusive programs as compared to the achievement of students who receive instruction in self-contained settings. Other aspects and implications of inclusive education are also discussed.
Main Issues in Inclusive Education
Though there is growing evidence from reports favoring inclusion, it is necessary to ascertain whether inclusion is conducive for students with all levels of learning disabilities. There is also a growing concern that inclusive education is recommended and advocated as a simple economic remedy without adequately studying the implications of such a program for both non-disabled and disabled students.
It would be worthwhile to design and implement a practical methodology for inclusive education and to analyze the outcomes of such an approach. Given the various research results that support inclusion, it is reasonable to conclude that an intensive educational system designed for an inclusive environment would corroborate the finding that inclusive education can improve educational standards without compromising quality. A review of the literature on inclusive education programs — with particular emphasis on academic performance and teacher training — therefore assumes great significance.
Bibliography
Freund, M., & Wald, P.J. (1995). An early education program for children with disabilities: Final report. Washington, DC: Department of Teacher Preparation and Special Education.
Staub, D. (1996). Inclusion and the other kids. Retrieved May 3, 2004, from
Inos, R.H., & Quigley, M.A. (1995). Research review for inclusive practice. Honolulu, HI: Pacific Region Educational Lab.
Hallahan, D.P., & Kauffman, J.M. (1994). Exceptional children: Introduction to special education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Sevier County Board of Education. Scruggs and Mastropieri 1995. Retrieved May 3, 2004, from http://www.slc.sevier.org/inclsumm.htm
Cook, P.O. Impact of inclusion. Retrieved May 4, 2004, from http://www.uscs.edu/academics/se/other_pdfs/cook.richards.duck.pdf
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.