IRA and FARC: Comparing Two Persistent Terrorist Groups
This paper compares two terrorist organizations — the Real Irish Republican Army (RIRA), a splinter group of the historic Irish Republican Army, and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC). The paper traces the IRA's origins in early twentieth-century Irish independence struggles through to the modern RIRA, and examines FARC's Marxist roots and decades-long insurgency against the Colombian government. Key topics include each group's stated objectives, fundraising tactics, recruitment practices, and relative scale of operations. The paper concludes by highlighting the most significant differences between the two organizations, as well as an noted connection between them involving the transfer of bomb-making expertise.
- Introduction: Overview of IRA and FARC as subjects
- The History of the IRA: IRA origins, Bloody Sunday, peace accord
- The Real IRA (RIRA): RIRA splinter group, attacks, funding
- Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC): FARC history, Marxist goals, child soldiers
- Differences Between RIRA and FARC: Scale, territory, recruitment, and funding contrasts
- Conclusion: Both groups persist despite limited American awareness
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper uses named, credible sources — the Council on Foreign Relations, Human Rights Watch, the National Counterterrorism Center, and Global Security — to ground its historical and factual claims.
- It organizes the content logically, treating each organization separately before drawing direct comparisons, which makes the structural argument easy to follow.
- The use of specific details (membership estimates, dates, attack examples, child recruitment statistics) adds concrete evidence to what could otherwise remain abstract claims.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates comparative analysis: rather than simply summarizing two subjects, it identifies shared features (political grievance, fundraising through criminal activity, armed violence against governments) and then systematically distinguishes the organizations by scale, territorial control, recruitment practices, and political leverage. The noted operational link between RIRA and FARC — bomb-making training — is an effective closing detail that complicates the otherwise clean comparison.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief framing introduction, then provides historical background on the IRA and its evolution into the RIRA, followed by a parallel section on FARC's history and operations. A dedicated comparison section synthesizes the prior material. The works cited page follows APA conventions. The structure is straightforward and suited to an undergraduate survey paper on political violence or international security.
Introduction
When the average American is asked to name two or three known terrorist organizations, he or she will most likely name al-Qaeda. Other groups that come to mind might be Hezbollah or the Taliban, and perhaps Americans still have some familiarity with the Irish Republican Army. It is a safe assumption, however, that many Americans are not familiar with FARC — the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia — and yet FARC is a violent and powerful force in South America.
The IRA has splintered into several smaller groups, including the Real IRA (RIRA), which continues to carry out violence against the British presence in Northern Ireland. Although a peace agreement ended the old IRA's armed campaign and the organization was formally disbanded, tensions remain, and the RIRA conducts violent actions to keep those tensions high. In Colombia, FARC is a far more potent organization than the RIRA and makes demands that the Colombian government cannot ignore. These two groups are less familiar to Americans than al-Qaeda or the Taliban, but they are persistent, violent, and ruthless, and deserve to be understood by anyone with a concern for peace in the world. This paper examines the history and current status of the RIRA and FARC, and draws comparisons between the two organizations.
The History of the IRA
Council on Foreign Relations journalist Kathryn Gregory explains that what people refer to today as the "IRA" is actually an outgrowth of a much older group that "successfully challenged British rule in the whole of Ireland" in the early twentieth century. Between 1916 and 1921, the original IRA violently attacked British troops occupying Ireland, and that campaign of aggression forced England to grant independence to most of the island. However, in return, the IRA's leaders "agreed to allow Ireland's six northern counties to remain under British rule" (Gregory, 2008). England then reconstituted the provinces the IRA conceded as Ulster — better known as Northern Ireland.
After that agreement was reached, several factions within the IRA remained deeply unhappy with the compromise and stayed hostile toward England. By the 1960s, Gregory writes, the actions of the dissatisfied factions had "dwindled significantly." Then, in the late 1960s, widespread reports emerged of discrimination against Roman Catholics in the British-governed sections of Northern Ireland. When civil rights marchers engaged in civil disobedience against the Protestant-dominated British police forces, tensions erupted into violence. The English government sent troops into the streets of Northern Ireland; that move alienated many Catholics and helped radicalize the IRA. Those within the IRA who turned to violence — snipers, assassins, and bombers — split off into the "Provisional IRA" (PIRA). The original IRA, which advocated peaceful tactics, faded into obscurity.
Then, in January 1972, British forces opened fire at a Catholic civil rights rally and killed 14 unarmed people. This event, known as Bloody Sunday, caused PIRA membership to soar, and over the next nearly two decades violence escalated dramatically. Militant Catholics in the north, though a minority compared to Protestants, joined the PIRA's campaign against British forces. Catholics were broadly discriminated against in housing, employment, and treatment before the law (Gregory, 2008).
In the years of bloodshed that followed, approximately 3,600 people died as a result of the conflict between the IRA and British troops. In the late 1990s, a peace accord was signed between the PIRA and the British government. Today, the political wing of the IRA — Sinn Féin — holds several elected positions in the Northern Irish provincial government, and most British military forces have withdrawn from the region.
In 2000, the U.S. State Department removed the IRA from its official list of terrorist organizations. However, two splinter groups that formed from the IRA — the Real IRA and the Continuity IRA — remain on that list. The Real IRA appears just above the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC) on the State Department's roster.
The Real IRA (RIRA)
According to Global Security, the RIRA is composed of former members of the Provisional IRA who refused to participate in the weapons decommissioning process in September 2005. The RIRA continues its armed resistance to British partition of Ireland. Global Security reports that the RIRA has carried out more than 80 terrorist attacks since 1999. The group's founder, Michael McKevitt, was sentenced to 20 years in prison in August 2003, but the organization has continued to operate and has been linked to firebombings in recent years. The RIRA also claimed responsibility for killing two British soldiers at an army base in March 2009.
There are estimated to be several hundred active RIRA members. The group raises much of its money by smuggling diesel and cigarettes across the Irish border. Unlike the Provisional IRA, which maintained an anti-drug stance, the RIRA is known to engage in drug smuggling and dealing (Global Security, 2008).
Conclusion
The Irish Republican Army and FARC represent two of the more persistent and violent terrorist organizations operating in the world today, though they differ enormously in scale, political leverage, and operational capacity. The RIRA is a small remnant of a once-powerful movement, keeping alive a campaign of violence that most former IRA members have abandoned in favor of political participation. FARC, by contrast, is a large, well-funded Marxist insurgency that has destabilized Colombia for decades, exploiting both the drug trade and the desperation of impoverished rural communities to sustain itself. While neither organization receives the same level of attention in American public discourse as al-Qaeda or the Taliban, both deserve to be known and understood by anyone who seeks a clearer picture of political violence and its consequences around the world.
References
Center for Defense Information. (2007). Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC). Retrieved February 6, 2009, from
Global Security. (2008). Real Irish Republican Army. Retrieved February 5, 2009, from http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/para/nira.htm
Global Security. (2009). Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia — FARC. Retrieved February 6, 2009, from
Gregory, K. (2008). Provisional Irish Republican Army (IRA) (aka, PIRA, "The Provos," Oglaigh na hEireann) (U.K., separatists). Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved February 6, 2009, from
Human Rights Watch. (2005). Colombia: Armed groups sent children to war. Retrieved February 5, 2009, from
McDermott, J. (2005, January 14). "IRA influence" in FARC attacks. BBC News. Retrieved February 6, 2009, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/americas/4528109.stm
National Counterterrorism Center. (2010). Counterterrorism Calendar 2010: Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC). Retrieved February 5, 2009, from
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.