This essay examines the ongoing debate over whether exposure to media violence causes aggressive behavior in children and adolescents. Drawing on research from the American Psychiatric Association, W. James Potter, and other sources, the paper explores the correlation between violent media and aggression, the methodological challenges of establishing causation, and the phenomenon of desensitization. It also considers Gerard Jones's counterargument that fantasy violence may serve constructive developmental purposes. The essay concludes that while modern society is undeniably saturated with violent imagery, aggressive behavior is more likely shaped by family, culture, and individual personality than by media consumption alone.
The paper models the important technique of qualifying claims based on the strength of available evidence. Rather than asserting that media violence "causes" aggression, the writer consistently notes what the research can and cannot establish, citing specific scholars (Potter, Nikolaos) while acknowledging methodological limitations. This epistemic caution is a hallmark of credible academic argumentation.
The essay opens with a strong authoritative quotation to establish the debate, then moves through supporting evidence, a counterargument (Jones), a methodology critique, and a discussion of desensitization before arriving at a measured conclusion. This classic problem–counterpoint–analysis structure keeps the argument balanced and progresses logically from claim to complication to resolution.
The American Psychiatric Association exclaims, "The debate is over. Over the last three decades, the one overriding finding in research on the mass media is that exposure to media portrayals of violence increases aggressive behavior in children." In addition to the correlation between exposure to violent media and aggressive behavior, the APA asserts "that exposure to depictions of violence causes desensitization and creates a climate of fear." However, causation is difficult to ascertain, as sociological and psychological studies in the area of media violence research can generally only suggest correlation, not causation.
Nevertheless, children are exposed to countless violent images — imagery that has become increasingly realistic over the past several years due to advancements in technology. Not only do movies and television shows glorify violence, but children's video games and even the music they listen to contribute to a culture of violence. There is no doubt that the United States harbors a culture of violence. Incidents such as school shootings draw the public's attention to the role of violent media: its potential effects on developing minds and its potential effects on society at large. If violence in media causes increased aggression, then some public policy changes are in order. Reputable studies do show that violence in the media can prompt aggressive behavior toward others or toward oneself, even when the portrayals of violence are fictional.
Fictional violence is in fact one of the primary ways young children and adolescents are exposed to violence in the media. Forty-six percent of all television violence may take place in children's cartoons, and children's programs are also highly unlikely to depict the long-term consequences of violence; rather, they portray violence in a humorous fashion most of the time ("Facts about Media Violence"). Cartoons are not the only culprit for promoting the notion that violent behavior has no consequences. The glamorization of violence by popular music stars also contributes to a growing sense among youth that violence is acceptable, even desirable behavior. Certainly such skewed and outright false ideas must have negative consequences on the individual psyche and the collective psyche of Americans.
Gerard Jones would probably disagree. In his book Killing Monsters, Jones describes how and why children might in fact need fantasy violence in order to develop constructive coping skills. Fantasy violence might help children master their psychological and social realities, make sense of complicated emotions like anger and sadness, and develop self-confidence, self-efficacy, and a sense of humor. Moreover, fantasy violence — especially as its depictions have evolved in recent years — might be highly beneficial for young girls. One chapter of Killing Monsters, titled "Girl Power," demonstrates the relevance of physically strong female action heroes and how such characters can tremendously boost the self-esteem of young girls. Female action heroes, even and perhaps especially when they use violence to accomplish their goals, can help girls overcome the otherwise gender-biased tendencies within traditional media and within the broader culture.
Still, in light of psychological and sociological evidence, the types of so-called positive forms of fantasy violence must be reexamined and challenged. Unfortunately, studying the real-world effects of media violence is notoriously and almost unavoidably difficult. Defining what constitutes violence is itself a central problem in research methodology ("Research on the Effects of Media Violence"). For example, is it violent when the Road Runner causes the Coyote to fall from a cliff? Are Discovery Channel episodes of lions eating zebras violent? Sometimes what constitutes violence in one parent's eyes is tame in another's. The simple presence of blood does not necessarily entail violence, so it can be hard to define media violence for research purposes.
Modern society is definitely violent, and now more than ever before in human history, people are being regularly bombarded with violent imagery. From television to video games to feature films, violence is depicted in ways that often glamorize it. The failure to show the negative effects of violent behavior could affect the ways young children perceive violence. For instance, in their attempts to emulate action heroes, children might use weapons indiscriminately or get into fights. However, violent behavior is nothing new. Violence and aggressive behavior are more likely consequences of family upbringing, parental role models, cultural norms, and individual personality than they are consequences of Bugs Bunny or Doom.
You’re 57% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.