Treatment Planning for Depression and PTSD in Military Veterans
This paper examines the treatment planning process for combat veterans experiencing depression, PTSD, and suicidal ideation. It discusses the elevated suicide rates among military personnel, the importance of thorough screening and assessment using validated tools such as the Beck Depression Inventory and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and the development of crisis intervention plans. The paper reviews evidence-based treatment modalities—including cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), psychotropic medications, and biofeedback—while addressing the high comorbidity of PTSD and depression in this population. It also highlights the role of family and community engagement, readiness for treatment, and the identification of addictive behaviors as part of comprehensive care.
- Introduction: Military Suicide and Depression Risk: Suicide rates and depression risk in military personnel
- Screening and Assessment for Combat Veterans: Validated tools for diagnosing PTSD and depression
- Crisis Intervention Planning: Building a crisis plan with community resources
- Identifying Risk Factors and Comorbid Conditions: Military-specific depression risk factors and comorbidities
- Evidence-Based Treatment Modalities: CBT, EMDR, medication, and combined treatment approaches
- Engagement, Goals, and Ongoing Suicidality Assessment: Client readiness, short-term goals, and suicidality monitoring
- Addressing Addictive Behaviors and Self-Medication: Treating addiction linked to trauma and self-medication
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its clinical recommendations in specific, named assessment instruments (Beck Depression Inventory, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Mississippi Scale for Combat-Related PTSD), lending credibility and practical utility to the discussion.
- It moves logically from population-level risk data through assessment, crisis planning, treatment selection, and secondary condition management, creating a coherent clinical workflow.
- The paper acknowledges the cultural dimension of treatment resistance—particularly around medication management—showing sensitivity to the military population's unique values and attitudes.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses integration of multiple peer-reviewed sources to build a layered argument. Rather than citing a single authority, it draws on epidemiological studies, clinical psychology research, and diagnostic criteria (DSM-IV-TR) to justify each recommendation, demonstrating how evidence synthesis drives clinical decision-making in treatment planning.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a sequential clinical logic: it opens with epidemiological context establishing urgency, then moves through screening, crisis intervention, risk factor assessment, treatment modality selection, client engagement strategies, and finally secondary condition treatment. Each section builds on the prior one, mirroring the actual stages of clinical case management. The references section cites five peer-reviewed sources, reflecting undergraduate-level APA documentation practice.
Introduction: Military Suicide and Depression Risk
Suicide rates among current and former military personnel are striking in comparison to non-military populations. Suicides of military personnel make up 20% of all suicides in the United States (Wells et al., 2010). The deployment of a soldier places unique stress on the individual and their family. This can be particularly complicated for an individual who is at risk for mental health issues such as depression or anxiety (Wells et al., 2010). Male soldiers who have experienced combat are at an increased risk of developing major depressive disorders (Wells et al., 2010). In order to effectively prevent suicide in these individuals, several steps must be taken, including screening, assessment, treatment planning, and treatment engagement.
Screening and Assessment for Combat Veterans
The screening and assessment process must clarify diagnoses, ruling out Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), which is present in many military personnel who have been exposed to combat. To clarify a diagnosis, the clinician must complete a thorough history as well as a clinical interview to determine whether there are underlying mental health issues that place the individual at greater risk for the development of PTSD, depression, or suicidal tendencies during deployment. Screening tools such as the Post-Deployment Health Assessment and the Mississippi Scale for Combat-Related PTSD, as well as depression scales such as the Beck Depression Inventory and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, can be useful for rating depression and overall mental health. These tools are easy to score and interpret. A thorough suicide risk assessment will also be administered, as this individual has endorsed suicidal ideation.
Crisis Intervention Planning
An initial crisis intervention plan should be implemented to ensure that the individual has the resources necessary to prevent suicidal behaviors. At the heart of this plan is the individual's ability to identify high-risk thoughts or situations that may trigger depressive episodes or suicidal behaviors. Interventions included in this plan should identify friends and/or family members who can lend support when crises occur. The plan will also include community resources such as information regarding the toll-free Veterans Crisis Line (988 TALK), which was established by the Department of Veterans Affairs to provide trained counselors 24/7 to veterans experiencing emotional crisis. The individual will also be provided with information regarding local emergency mental health providers for severe situations.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (Revised 4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Owens, G. P., Dashevsky, B., Chard, K. M., Mohamed, S., Haji, U., Heppner, P. S., & Baker, D. G. (2009). The relationship between childhood trauma, combat exposure, and posttraumatic stress disorder in male veterans. Military Psychology, 21(1), 114–125.
Seal, K. H., Metzler, T. J., Gima, K. S., Bertenthal, D., Maguen, S., & Marmar, C. R. (2009). Trends and risk factors for mental health diagnoses among Iraq and Afghanistan veterans using Department of Veterans Affairs health care, 2002–2008. American Journal of Public Health, 99(9), 1651–1658. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.150284
Silver, S., Brooks, A., & Obenchain, J. (1995). Treatment of Vietnam War veterans with PTSD: A comparison of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing, biofeedback, and relaxation training. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 8(2), 337–342.
Wells, T. S., LeardMann, C. A., Fortuna, S. O., Smith, B., Smith, T. C., Ryan, M. A., Boyoko, E. J., & Blazer, D. (2010). A prospective study of depression following combat deployment in support of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. American Journal of Public Health, 100(1), 90–99. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.155432
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.