This paper examines Michael Pollan's The Omnivore's Dilemma, analyzing the core tension humans face when deciding what to eat and the ecological consequences of those choices. The paper surveys Pollan's three principal food chains — industrial, organic, and hunter-gatherer — with particular attention to the dominance of corn in modern agribusiness and its environmental costs. It also reflects on the author's own consumption habits as a practical test of Pollan's framework, incorporates Anthony Bourdain's critique of American food culture, and concludes with a call for individual and public-policy responses to unsustainable food production.
The paper demonstrates applied textual analysis: it extracts a central theoretical claim from Pollan's book, then tests that claim against real-world examples (corn agribusiness, a personal breakfast purchase) and a secondary source (Bourdain's interview). This move — from theory to illustration to secondary corroboration — is a reliable structure for evaluative academic writing at the undergraduate level.
The paper opens by defining the omnivore's dilemma and Pollan's analytical method, then surveys his four food-production models. It zooms in on corn as the central industrial case study, pivots to a first-person application of Pollan's theory, adds Bourdain's complementary critique, and closes with a normative reflection on policy and individual action. This funnel structure — broad concept → specific evidence → personal reflection → call to action — is well-suited to a short evaluative essay.
In The Omnivore's Dilemma, Michael Pollan focuses on the way humans consume food. He uses both an anthropological and historical basis for his analysis, and yet finds a psychological conundrum in the seminal question at the heart of the study: What is the omnivore's dilemma? In general, the dilemma is that humans are omnivorous — we can eat meat, grain, vegetables, and a wide variety of what nature has to offer. Deciding what to eat, and which bounty of nature to utilize, becomes a dilemma due to differences in geography, physical culture, social pressures, and even the simple availability of products.
The anxiety is compounded not only by choice, but also by taste, preference, and the ability to "tame" a particular cuisine. Now, however, with the advent of the post-industrial economy, humans are capable of doing tremendous damage to the planet based on the decisions they make about what to eat. Pollan notes that we now face the added dilemma of potentially devastating the ecology of some areas simply to satisfy a taste for a certain cuisine. To illuminate these ecological issues, Pollan reviews three principal food chains — industrial, organic, and hunter-gatherer — and examines the historical, economic, and sociological consequences of each.
The Omnivore's Dilemma provides a broad overview of the four basic models of food production that have arisen to help society deal efficiently with growing food needs: the large-scale industrial system, the big "organic" operation, the local self-sufficient farm, and the old-fashioned hunter-gatherer society. Rather than taking a simple geographical or historical approach, Pollan uses each of these broad categories to examine the way plants enter the food chain and the relationship they have with animals — and the tension that relationship creates. It is this tension that Pollan finds almost illogical, since it is often counterproductive to both sides of the equation, generating a number of negative consequences for the interrelationship between humans and our environment.
Corn, for instance, has become a model for the large-scale, modern version of agribusiness. In a more eco-friendly model, livestock and crops are part of a natural cycle: we grow corn to eat, use as feed, and plow back into the ground, maintaining a balance between all elements. In the contemporary world, however, this balance has been lost. Because of economics, the small corn farmer has typically been overtaken by large agribusiness, and again because of economics — specifically, the need to find uses for surplus corn — corn is now used to fatten cattle, produce corn oil and high-fructose corn syrup, and generate so many derivatives that if one stripped grocery shelves of anything made with corn, those shelves would be nearly bare.
Corn is a highly adaptable plant, but also a demanding one. As Pollan observes, it "consumes prodigious quantities of fossil fuel energy and turns out ever more prodigious quantities of food energy" (p. 45). Corn is so dominant that it is now used for far more than food. Leftover products are processed into chemicals such as ethanol, glucose, and the xanthan gum found in candy and ice cream — even used to fatten the chickens that spend their lives in small cages before becoming chicken nuggets. Corn as a sweetener appears in ketchup and is used to cook French fries, all without providing adequate nutritional value and while taking more from the environment than is given back (pp. 109–119).
Buck, C. (November/December 2010). The omnivore's agenda: An interview with Anthony Bourdain. Mother Jones. Retrieved from http://motherjones.com/environment/2010/09/interview-anthony-bourdain
Levine, K. (June 4, 2001). Interview with Michael Pollan on a plant's eye view of the world. Morning Edition, National Public Radio. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org
Pollan, M. (2007). The omnivore's dilemma. New York: Penguin Books.
You’re 58% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.