Documentary Review: A Death in St. Augustine (PBS Frontline)
This paper provides a systematic review of the PBS Frontline documentary "A Death in St. Augustine," which examines the death of Michelle O'Connell on September 2, 2010, and the subsequent investigation by the St. Johns County Sheriff's Office in Florida. The review identifies the documentary's major issues, primary individuals and groups involved, and several producer biases. It also evaluates what was compelling and unconvincing about the film, reflects on what was learned regarding law enforcement's code of silence, and assesses whether the documentary successfully presents both sides of a case in which O'Connell's death was officially ruled a suicide despite significant circumstantial evidence pointing to her boyfriend, Sheriff Deputy Jeremy Banks.
- Introduction: Context of policing, racial justice, and paper scope
- Major Issue Addressed by the Documentary: Special treatment for law enforcement; O'Connell's death
- Primary Individuals and Groups Involved: O'Connell, Deputy Banks, and St. Johns Sheriff's Office
- Filmmaker Bias in the Documentary: Editorial framing, circumstantial evidence emphasis, code of silence
- Strengths, Weaknesses, and What Was Learned: Production quality, nebulous ending, code of silence
- Unconvincing Elements and Persuasive Techniques: Bruise evidence, one-sided persuasion, recommended improvements
- Conclusion: Official suicide ruling persists despite circumstantial evidence
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The review follows a clear, structured format that systematically addresses each evaluative dimension of the documentary — major issues, individuals involved, bias, strengths, weaknesses, and persuasion — making it easy to follow.
- The writer balances personal reaction with analytical observation, noting where they were "nearly, but not completely" persuaded by the filmmakers' framing, which demonstrates critical engagement rather than passive viewing.
- Specific textual evidence, such as O'Connell's text messages and the bruise detail, grounds the analysis in concrete examples rather than vague impressions.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates bias identification as an analytical skill — the writer distinguishes between what the documentary presents as fact and what reflects editorial choices by the producers, such as the selection of interview subjects and the framing of circumstantial evidence. This is a valuable critical-viewing technique applicable to media literacy coursework.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief contextual introduction referencing the broader national conversation on policing, then moves through a series of discrete evaluative sections addressing the documentary's subject matter, cast, bias, production quality, anomalies, and persuasive effect. It closes with a summary conclusion recapping the official ruling and the lingering questions the film raises. Each section is self-contained, making the paper well-suited to a structured response or review assignment format.
Introduction
The nationwide — and then global — calls for racial justice that erupted following the murder of George Floyd on May 25, 2020, by Minneapolis police officers underscore the public's overwhelmingly negative reaction when law enforcement authorities, long held in high esteem and respect, are suspected of committing violent crimes themselves. This dynamic makes the case examined in A Death in St. Augustine all the more resonant.
The purpose of this paper is to provide a systematic review of the PBS Frontline documentary "A Death in St. Augustine" in order to identify and describe the major issue addressed by the film and the primary individuals and groups involved. In addition, the paper describes several biases identified in the documentary, evaluates what was and was not effective about it, and reflects on what was learned from watching it. This is followed by a discussion of elements in the film that were unconvincing or anomalous, and a consideration of whether the documentary changed this writer's perspective on the subject. Finally, the paper addresses whether the documentary would be recommended to others, and closes with a summary of key findings in the conclusion.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.