Bever Brothers Familicide: Motives, Mental Illness, and Juvenile Justice
This paper examines the 2015 Broken Arrow, Oklahoma familicide in which brothers Robert and Michael Bever murdered their parents and three siblings. Drawing on criminological research and court testimony, the paper analyzes the case through several lenses: the demographic and behavioral patterns typical of familicide, the role of premeditation and delusional thinking, the impact of child abuse and parental neglect on the brothers' psychological development, and the desire for notoriety as a motivating factor. The paper also addresses how the two brothers were treated differently by the justice system, raising broader questions about juvenile culpability, coercion, and the appropriateness of trying minors as adults.
- Introduction: The Broken Arrow Case: Overview of 2015 Oklahoma familicide and thesis
- Motives and Patterns of Familicide: Demographic patterns, weapons, and premeditation details
- Premeditation, Delusional Thinking, and Mental Illness: Robert's delusions, affect, and psychiatric diagnoses
- Child Abuse, Neglect, and Environmental Factors: Parental abuse and social isolation as precipitating causes
- Desire for Fame as a Motive: Brothers' wish for notoriety as serial killers
- Differing Culpability and the Justice System: How each brother was tried and sentenced differently
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds its analysis in peer-reviewed criminological literature (e.g., Fegadel & Heide, Bourget et al., Mailloux), using case-specific facts to illustrate broader research patterns on familicide.
- Distinguishes between the two brothers' differing levels of culpability and mental states, adding analytical nuance rather than treating them as a single unit.
- Connects environmental factors — parental abuse, social isolation, and neglect — to the psychological outcomes observed, demonstrating awareness of multi-causal explanations in criminology.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses case study analysis anchored to a theoretical and empirical framework. By consistently returning to published research on familicide patterns — demographics, weapon choice, premeditation, mental illness — the author situates a sensational case within a disciplined academic context, avoiding purely narrative or emotional treatment of the crime.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an overview of the Broken Arrow case and a thesis identifying three key analytical factors. It then moves through the case's motive structure and demographic fit with familicide research, examines premeditation and mental illness, explores child abuse as a precipitating factor, discusses the brothers' desire for fame, and closes by contrasting the legal outcomes for each brother. The structure follows a logical progression from description to explanation to legal consequence.
Introduction: The Broken Arrow Case
One of the most heinous familicide cases in American history occurred in Broken Arrow, Oklahoma in 2015. Two brothers, aged 16 and 18, tortured and killed their parents and three of their five siblings. The older brother, Robert, has been widely considered to be the mastermind of the murder plot and coerced his younger brother into helping him (Youngman & Jensen, 2018, p. 1). Both brothers received multiple life sentences in a trial that concluded in 2018. Robert had pleaded guilty in 2016, and the younger brother Michael was tried separately ("Michael Bever, Okla. teen, guilty of fatally stabbing parents, 3 younger siblings," 2018). In fact, half of the jurors in the younger brother's trial "sent the judge a letter asking that Michael Bever get the chance to go free one day" (Silman, 2018, p. 1). The Broken Arrow case shows how two brothers who collaborated on the same crime operated with vastly different motives and intent.
Given how horrific the case is, it may be easy to dismiss the psychological issues and environmental causes that precipitated the familicide. However, criminologists need to thoroughly assess the situation, taking into account the multiple interrelated variables that led up to the crime. The Broken Arrow incident showcases the importance of environmental cues, including child abuse but also broader social norms embedded in the surrounding society. Younger brother Michael does seem to have acted more out of coercion — if not outright fear of his older brother — which, had he been an adult, might have made him appear even more culpable given the lack of evidence of mental illness in his case. The fact that Michael was only sixteen at the time of the crime demonstrates the relevance of a separate juvenile justice system, suggesting that trying juveniles as adults can indeed prove problematic. As Heide (2016, p. 1) notes, "adolescents are more likely to kill because the normal turbulence of adolescence runs up against constraints they perceive have been placed upon them in a setting of limited alternatives." The main factors to consider in the Broken Arrow case include the unique features of juvenile familicide, the role of child abuse and related trauma, and the role mental illness plays in cases like these.
References
Bourget, D., Gagne, P., & Labelle, M. (2007). Parricide: A comparative study of matricide versus patricide. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 35(2007), 306–312.
Couri, R. (2016, February 24). Warning: Graphic details from testimony in Bever brothers hearing. KRMG.
Fegadel, A. R., & Heide, K. M. (2016). Offspring-perpetrated familicide. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61(1), 6–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x15589091
Heide, K. M. (2016). Why kids kill parents. Psychology Today. https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/articles/199209/why-kids-kill-parents
Mailloux, S. (2014). Fatal families: Why children are killed in familicide occurrences. Journal of Family Violence, 29(8), 921–926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-014-9643-0
Michael Bever, Okla. teen, guilty of fatally stabbing parents, 3 younger siblings. (2018, May 10). CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/michael-bever-okla-teen-guilty-of-fatally-stabbing-parents-three-younger-siblings/
News Corp Australia Network. (2018, May 11). Teen Michael Bever who helped brother Robert kill family found guilty in Oklahoma. News.com.au. https://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/teen-michael-bever-who-helped-brother-robert-kill-family-found-guilty-in-oklahoma/news-story/20851c6cf361f853739f810a8247501
Querry, K. (2018, May 8). Testimony in Broken Arrow murder trial delayed. Oklahoma News 4. https://kfor.com/2018/05/08/testimony-in-broken-arrow-murder-trial-delayed/
Salinger, T. (2016, February 23). Oklahoma teen "laughed" while describing killing five family members as part of brothers' gruesome mass murder plan. New York Daily News. https://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/okla-teens-killed-family-part-mass-murder-plan-article-1.2541695
Silman, J. (2018, August 10). Brother who killed five family members in brutal Oklahoma stabbings given five life sentences. Oxygen Crime Time. https://www.oxygen.com/crime-time/michael-bever-family-murder-five-life-sentences
Tosini, D. (2017). Familicide in Italy: An exploratory study of cases involving male perpetrators (1992–2015). Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260517714436
Whiteley, M., Terrell, N., & Bodman, D. A. (2016). Familicide. Encyclopedia of Family Studies. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119085621.wbefs390
Youngman, C., & Jensen, A. (2018, May 4). Robert Bever sobs in younger brother's murder trial: "I don't know what I was thinking." Fox 25 News. https://okcfox.com/news/local/robert-bever-sobs-in-brothers-murder-trial-i-dont-know-what-i-was-thinking
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.