PDI Food Labeling in Australia: Consumer Behavior and Policy
This paper examines the launch of Percentage Daily Intake (PDI) nutritional labeling in Australia, exploring whether such labeling effectively supports healthful food choices. Drawing on European research involving over 2,000 in-store observations and interviews, the paper highlights a critical gap between consumer knowledge and behavior: most shoppers understand nutritional labels but only 27% actually apply that information when choosing food. The paper uses the "Got Milk" campaign as a model for embedding labeling policy within a broader, celebrity-driven marketing strategy. It concludes that PDI labeling can only succeed when integrated into a comprehensive, multi-instrument public nutrition policy.
- Introduction to PDI Labeling in Australia: Overview of PDI labeling and its voluntary role
- Selection of Launch Approach: Top-down marketing strategy using Got Milk as model
- Consumer Knowledge and Food Choice Variables: Socio-ecological factors shaping food decisions
- Research on Nutritional Label Effectiveness: European studies reveal knowledge-behavior gap
- Conclusion: Celebrity endorsement and broad policy needed for success
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Uses a well-known real-world marketing case study (the "Got Milk" campaign) to ground an abstract policy recommendation in concrete, relatable evidence.
- Integrates peer-reviewed research from multiple European countries to support claims about the gap between consumer knowledge and actual food-choice behavior.
- Connects micro-level individual variables (taste preferences, demographics) to macro-level policy recommendations through the socio-ecological framework.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses the "knowledge-behavior gap" as a structuring argument: it first establishes that consumers understand nutritional labels (high comprehension scores), then pivots to show that comprehension alone does not drive healthful choices. This rhetorical move — acknowledging what existing interventions do well before identifying their limitation — is a strong academic technique that avoids oversimplification and strengthens the case for a broader policy approach.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with context on PDI labeling, then argues for a top-down promotional approach using the "Got Milk" campaign as a template. The central section surveys socio-ecological consumer research, followed by a detailed review of European label-use studies. The conclusion synthesizes findings into a practical policy recommendation for Australia, tying together the marketing and research threads.
Introduction to PDI Labeling in Australia
In many countries, packaged foods are labeled with the "Percentage Daily Intake" (PDI) of nutrients contained in the food. These thumbnail-like labels are provided to consumers to help them make informed dietary decisions when they shop. This nutritional labeling is not mandatory and is supplementary to other nutritional information included in the nutrition information panel typically located on the back of packaged foods. The effectiveness of this type of labeling in supporting healthful food choices and eating habits is the focus of this brief.
References
Bonsmann, SS, Fernandez Celemin, L, Larranaga, S, Egger, JM, Wills, C, Hodgkins, C and Raats, MM. [Flabel Consortium. Penetration of nutrition information on food labels across the EU-27 plus Turkey]. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2010; DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2010.179
Devine CM. (2005) A life course perspective: Understanding food choices in time, social location, and history. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 37(3):121–128.
EUFIC — European Food Information Council (2010, October 13). Nutrition labels on food and drinks in the UK: Available, understood but not always used to make healthy choices. ScienceDaily. Retrieved September 24, 2011, from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/10/101013153838.htm
European Association for the Study of Obesity (2009, May 7). Consumers more likely to identify healthy food using traffic light nutrition labels. ScienceDaily. Retrieved September 24, 2011 from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/05/090507055506.htm
Glanz K, Resnicow K, Seymour J, Hoy K, Stewart H, Lyons M, Goldberg J. (2007) How major restaurant chains plan their menus: The role of profit, demand, and health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32(5):383–388.
Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K, (Eds.) (2008) Health behavior and health education: Theory, research, and practice. (4th ed.) San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Glanz K, Sallis JF, Saelens BE, Frank LD. (2005) Healthy nutrition environments: Concepts and measures. American Journal of Health Promotion. 19(5):330–333.
Gordon A, Fox MK. (2007) School Nutrition Dietary Assessment Survey-III: Summary of findings. Washington, DC: USDA Food and Nutrition Service.
Grasso VB. (2008) Department of Defense food procurement: Background and status CRS Report No. RS22190. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
Grunert, KG, Wills, JM, Fernandez-Celemin, L. (2010a) Nutrition knowledge, and use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels among consumers in the UK. Appetite, 55(2):177. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2010.05.045
Grunert, KG, Fernandez-Celemin, L, Wills, JM, Bonsmann, SS, Nureeva, L. (2010b) Use and understanding of nutrition information on food labels in six European countries. Journal of Public Health, 18(3):261. DOI: 10.1007/s10389-009-0307-0
Honkanen P, Olsen SO, Verplanken B. (2005) Intention to consume seafood — The importance of habit. Appetite. 45(2):161–168.
McLeroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz K. (1988) An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly. 15(4):351–377.
Raine KD. (2005) Determinants of healthy eating in Canada: An overview and synthesis. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 96(Supplement 3).
Shepherd R. (2005) Influences on food choice and dietary behavior. Forum of Nutrition, 57:36–43.
Steele, Jon (1998) Truth, Lies, and Advertising: The Art of Account Planning. New York, NY: John Wiley. [Case study courtesy of Goody, Silverstein & Partners.] Retrieved from
Story M, Kaphingst KM, Robinson-O'Brien R, Glanz K. (2009) Creating healthy food and eating environments: Policy and environmental approaches. Annual Review of Public Health, 29:253–272.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.