This paper examines the Peckham Decision, which prohibited California school psychologists from using intelligence tests on African-American children to determine special educational needs. Drawing on scholarship about racial segregation and cultural group dynamics, the paper argues that the decision carries both potential benefits and drawbacks. On one hand, removing the test prevents automatic placement in lower-track classrooms and allows students to demonstrate their abilities organically. On the other hand, eliminating a diagnostic filter may disadvantage students with genuine learning needs and disrupt overall classroom learning. The paper concludes that no simple solution exists when diverse learners share a classroom, and that political pressures risk overshadowing the educational realities at stake.
As Dingfelder (2004) notes, it is difficult to enforce desegregation when there are so many ways to keep groups separated, as shown in the history of Shaker Heights. Indeed, as Waugh (1939) observes, groups tend to segregate themselves in every culture and society. But how does this relate to the Peckham Decision, which states that California school psychologists may no longer use intelligence testing on African-American children in order to determine whether a child has special educational needs?
It relates because in the struggle to enforce equality, there is a tendency to be overprotective and to overemphasize points that may appear "biased" but in actuality are merely attempting to be helpful. In the case of the Peckham Decision, for instance, the ruling to ban testing can be seen as both helpful and harmful for African-American students with special needs. Yet the issue will likely be so politicized that any positive impact will be muted by political blowback, and the issue of education will play second fiddle to the much larger "issue" of political correctness. As Waugh might have said, political correctness deals in fantasy, while people must deal in reality. The reality of the Peckham Decision is that it might both help and harm students, and here is why.
The Peckham Decision might help students by not automatically placing them in a classroom designed for students with learning disabilities, which would likely stymie their potential if they actually have the ability to learn at a higher level. By not enforcing the testing, it gives African-American school children the opportunity to be challenged at the same level as other school children. It puts all children on equal footing and allows them to demonstrate their own skill level.
In this way, school administrators can observe over the course of a year which children should be in remedial classes and which should move to more advanced classes. It is up to the child to prove whether he or she is up to the challenge — something that a single test cannot always show. Indeed, sometimes it is simply a matter of learning the skills necessary to move forward, and a child can excel beyond anyone's expectations.
"Lack of diagnostic filter disrupts classroom pacing"
The Peckham Decision could have both good and bad impacts on the lives of students and teachers, but in either case adjustments will have to be made by everyone involved. Simply put, there is no clear or easy solution to the challenges of education when diverse groups of individuals are brought together under one roof. Some will view separation as racist, others as classist, and still others as beneficial and necessary. In the end, however, choices must be made and a great deal of hard work and effort must be devoted to educating those who need it most.
You’re 68% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.