Petrolo Oil Crisis: Economic Analysis of Four Policy Options
This paper examines the economic situation facing Petrolo, a small island nation with significant oil reserves confronting a global petroleum demand slump and an unsustainable cost-price gap — producing oil at $50 per barrel while the market price stands at $40. Acting as a special consultant to the President, the author evaluates four policy options: halting oil production until prices recover, continuing to pump at a loss for cash flow, selling offshore licenses to private international companies, and diversifying into the leisure and tourism industry through bond financing. Each option is assessed for its fiscal, employment, and public-finance implications, culminating in a recommendation to pursue tourism diversification alongside offshore licensing agreements.
- Introduction: Petrolo's oil crisis and consultant mandate
- Option 1: Stop Pumping Until Prices Recover: Risks of halting oil production entirely
- Option 2: Keep Pumping to Maintain Cash Flow: Costs and benefits of operating at a loss
- Option 3: Sell Offshore Licenses to International Companies: Licensing risks and revenue sharing tradeoffs
- Option 4: Enter the Leisure and Tourism Market: Tourism diversification and tax-free incentives
- Conclusion and Recommendation: Top two policy recommendations for Petrolo
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Systematically evaluates each policy option by weighing both positive and negative economic consequences before drawing conclusions, demonstrating balanced analytical thinking.
- Grounds abstract economic choices in concrete figures (e.g., $40 market price vs. $50 extraction cost), making the argument accessible and precise.
- Integrates multiple sources to support distinct claims within each option, showing appropriate citation discipline throughout.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates cost-benefit reasoning applied to real-world policy analysis. Each option is structured around its positive and negative economic implications — covering fiscal risk, employment effects, government revenue, and public services — before a synthesis recommendation is offered. This mirrors the structure of a formal policy brief or economic advisory report.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a framing introduction establishing the economic crisis and the consultant's mandate. Four body sections address each policy option in sequence, each broken into advantages and disadvantages. The conclusion synthesizes the analysis into two prioritized recommendations — leisure market entry and offshore licensing — explaining the rationale for each choice in economic terms.
Introduction
The small island nation of Petrolo has massive oil reserves ranked number five globally in terms of high-grade petroleum. On the downside, global industrial economies have significantly slowed their petroleum consumption. In fact, global demand for oil is presently at a 25-year low, and oil prices are approximately 30 percent of what they were one year ago. Today, the price of a barrel stands at $40, whereas Petrolo's current average cost of pumping oil is $50 per barrel. This cost-price inversion represents a major concern for Petrolo, as the nation incurs a loss on every barrel produced. As a special consultant to the President, the task at hand is to evaluate the economic impact of four different options and provide a specific recommendation for what Petrolo should do.
Option 1: Stop Pumping Until Prices Recover
One option Petrolo is considering is halting oil production until the market price reaches at least the extraction cost of $50 per barrel. Given that the current market price is $40 against a production cost of $50, stopping production may seem logical. However, this approach carries significant drawbacks. Because government investments are expected to generate revenue, ceasing operations on an active project translates directly into losses. It is also important to note that positioning new oil extraction projects takes numerous years. If a project has already been established and significant capital invested, low prices alone should not justify abandoning it. One critical reason to continue is the existence of debt obligations, which must be repaid with interest regardless of whether oil pumping continues (Tverberg, 2016).
A further consequence concerns employee retention. The greatest assets of any oil company are its workers. Ceasing to pump oil would mean widespread job losses and an increase in the national unemployment rate. Once skilled workers are lost, it becomes significantly more difficult to recruit and retain new ones when operations resume. While oil wells can technically be stopped and restarted, the associated costs are substantial. According to Schoen (2015), restarting oil flow after a shutdown is an intricate process — one that involves the injection of steam into the ground — making it both technically demanding and expensive. Additionally, halting production eliminates revenue generation, causing tax receipts to decline. Citizens of Petrolo would also face shortages in the supply of oil for everyday uses such as transportation, as well as shortages in the by-products derived from oil refining that are used in the production of chemicals and plastics and other petroleum-based products (Schoen, 2015).
Option 2: Keep Pumping to Maintain Cash Flow
A second option is to continue pumping oil in order to preserve some cash flow. Despite generating a loss of $10 per barrel, continuing operations offers several economic advantages. Most notably, ongoing production generates revenue that can help sustain social benefits, keep taxation rates manageable for citizens, and maintain full employment. Furthermore, some oil fields may be nearing the end of their productive lifespan. Stopping production in these fields could result in a complete and permanent shutdown. The process of decommissioning aging infrastructure is itself extremely costly; in such cases, it may be more financially sensible to continue pumping at a modest loss rather than spending large sums to close the operation entirely (Schoen, 2015).
At the same time, continued pumping means that both the government and citizens of Petrolo must absorb ongoing losses. According to Schoen (2015), production costs include government taxes and royalties, and these could be reduced or suspended if the government wishes to sustain output. For instance, if the current tax rate on oil production is 20 percent, the government could reduce it to 15 or even 10 percent, thereby lowering the effective cost of production. Workers, too, may need to accept pay cuts to keep operations viable, further reducing unit costs. On the public services side, reduced tax revenues would likely mean fewer government-funded projects — for example, fewer roads built or maintained. Ultimately, however, this option means accepting a sustained negative margin of $10 per barrel, which risks eroding the financial foundations of the oil exploration and drilling industry over time.
Conclusion and Recommendation
The world demand level for oil is presently at a 25-year low, with prices for every barrel being approximately 30 percent of what they used to be a year ago. Presently, the government of Petrolo faces a predicament: the selling price for an oil barrel is $40, yet the cost to produce one barrel is $50. Two policy options are recommended in response to this crisis.
The first recommendation is to issue bonds to finance entry into the leisure market through the development of high-end hotels, casinos, and entertainment venues. From an economic perspective, this is a sound choice because oil drilling can continue in the southern half of the island while a new revenue stream is developed in the north. Given the accelerating decline in global oil demand and prices, diversifying into tourism allows Petrolo to generate income from a different sector entirely. Employment opportunities will be created, consumer spending will increase, and the influx of international tourists and investors will contribute to broader economic growth. The second recommendation is to sell offshore licenses to private international companies. The key advantage of this approach is that the government bears none of the production losses. Financial risk is transferred to the licensee, oil pumping continues, royalty revenues flow to the government, and once the contract period ends, the oil fields revert to national ownership. Together, these two strategies offer Petrolo the best prospect for economic stability and long-term growth in an era of depressed global oil prices.
References
Bikas, E., & Jureviciute, L. (2016). Impact of tax relief on public finance. Economics and Culture, 13(2), 14–22.
Oxfam. (2017). Malawi's troubled oil sector: Licenses, contracts and their implications. Retrieved from https://mininginmalawi.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/oxfam-2017-malawis-troubled-oil-sector-licenses-contracts-and-their-implications.pdf
Schoen, J. W. (2015). When, and where, oil is too cheap to be profitable. CNBC. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2015/01/12/oil-production-costs-when-and-where-the-price-of-crude-is-making-it-unprofitable.html
Tverberg, G. (2016). Why oil under $30 per barrel is a major problem. Our Finite World. Retrieved from https://ourfiniteworld.com/2016/01/19/why-oil-under-30-per-barrel-is-a-major-problem/
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.