Skip to main content
Book Review Undergraduate 2,793 words

Book Review: The Price of Inequality by Joseph Stiglitz

~14 min read 7 sections Economics · Economic Inequality
Abstract

This paper presents a critical review of Joseph E. Stiglitz's 2012 work, The Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers Our Future. The review begins with a biographical overview of Stiglitz, establishing his credibility as a Nobel Prize-winning economist. It then summarizes the book's central argument — that markets, politics, and systemic unfairness have together produced extreme wealth concentration in the United States. The review evaluates the text's evidence, including statistics on class mobility and income distribution, and connects its themes to public administration principles. It concludes with an assessment of the book's tone, impact, and relevance to contemporary debates about economic inequality and policy reform.

Key Takeaways
  • Introduction and Author Background: Stiglitz's biography and scholarly credentials introduced
  • Summary of the Text: Book's core progressive argument on inequality summarized
  • Critical Analysis of Core Arguments: Market failure, political dysfunction, and wealth data examined
  • Premise, Relevance, and Evidence: Class mobility statistics and public administration themes evaluated
  • The Author's Perspective and Personal Affect: Stiglitz's personal history and progressive viewpoint analyzed
  • The Book's Impact and Reader's View: Optimistic outlook and broader cultural impact assessed
  • Conclusion and Recommendations: Book praised as essential reading for economic reform debate
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾

What makes this paper effective

  • The paper grounds its analysis in a detailed biographical overview of Stiglitz, using the author's credentials to establish why his critique carries weight — a smart rhetorical move for a book review.
  • It integrates direct quotations from the text effectively, letting Stiglitz's own data and language carry the argumentative burden rather than paraphrasing everything.
  • The paper connects the book's themes explicitly to a course context (public administration), demonstrating the reviewer's ability to apply the reading to disciplinary concepts.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates source triangulation — it does not rely solely on the primary text but also brings in a secondary review from The Jefferson Institute and a New York Times critique to corroborate and contextualize Stiglitz's claims. This layering of sources strengthens the review's analytical credibility and models how a book review can move beyond summary toward genuine critical engagement.

Structure breakdown

The paper follows a clear, labeled multi-section format: author biography → text summary → critical analysis → evaluation of premise and evidence → discussion of authorial voice → reader response and impact → conclusion and recommendation. Each section has a distinct function, moving progressively from context-setting through analysis to personal assessment, which is a well-organized approach for an extended book review.

Essay 2,793 words

Introduction and Author Background

In 2013, issues of socioeconomic inequality were perhaps as pressing and problematic as they had ever been. This is the assertion at the crux of Joseph E. Stiglitz's text, The Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers Our Future (ISBN-13: 9780393345063). Released in 2012 by W.W. Norton & Company, the 560-page text is a timely and compelling contribution to the public discourse on the need for greater economic equality in the United States.

Understanding the orientation of the text requires a more complete understanding of its author — an economist, university professor, and winner of the 2001 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences. According to his self-composed biography at the Nobel Foundation site, Stiglitz (2001) was born in Gary, Indiana in 1943. By his own account, his interests as a young student led him to become actively involved in his high school debate club. He notes that some of the subjects that stirred the most passion in him as a student would emerge time and again in his later career as issues of great civic importance.

Stiglitz tells us that "the intellectually most formative experiences occurred during the three years 1960–1963 I spent at Amherst College, a small, New England college (at the time, a men's college with around 1,000 students)." (Stiglitz 2001, p. 1) He speaks highly of his experiences at Amherst, where he dedicated the bulk of his undergraduate efforts to physics. By his senior year, Stiglitz reports, he had become enamored of economics and switched courses entirely in order to make it his focus during graduate school. He earned a modest fellowship to assist his transfer to MIT, where he earned his PhD and held an assistant professorship. (Stiglitz 2001, p. 1)

From there, Stiglitz went on to become one of the most decorated, accomplished, and influential economists of the last several decades. According to his Curriculum Vitae (2013), Stiglitz holds honorary doctorates from more than 40 academic institutions, has held professorial positions at a number of top universities, served as the 17th Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers under President Bill Clinton, and held the office of World Bank Chief Economist between 1997 and 2000.

The full scope of Stiglitz's contributions cannot be contained here. However, even a surface view of the author's career reveals an individual highly qualified to offer commentary on the state of the U.S. economy. The highly critical nature of the text in question therefore comes with a strong degree of credibility.

Summary of the Text

Stiglitz makes no mystery of his perspective on economic inequality. From the outset of the text, he makes clear that his perspective is progressive in nature and highly sympathetic to the struggles of the middle class, the working class, and the impoverished. Moreover, the text approaches America's economic inequality as connected to patterns observable on a global scale. According to Stiglitz, the outpouring of protest and discontent that defined the Arab Spring and the Occupy Movement were connected even if separated by wide cultural and geographical gaps. Stiglitz also makes clear, in no uncertain terms, that his point of view has more in common with the protest movement than with the hegemonic forces standing in its way.

Accordingly, Stiglitz observes that "the protesters were right that something was wrong. The gap between what our economic and political systems are supposed to do — what we were told they did do — and what they actually do had become too large to be ignored. Governments around the world were not addressing key economic problems, including that of persistent unemployment; and as universal values of fairness became sacrificed to the greed of a few, in spite of rhetoric to the contrary, the feeling of unfairness became a feeling of betrayal." (p. x)

This passage offers a philosophical framework for the larger part of the text, which takes the view that capitalism has been stifled by a generation of corrupt, entrenched interest groups permeating both industry and politics. This is the prerogative for a text that largely condemns the forces responsible for the economic ailments of inequality and recession. Stiglitz proceeds to lay out an argument that true capitalism should cure rather than intensify socioeconomic inequality. The Price of Inequality asserts that greed and exploitation have created an increasingly sharp wealth divide in which a vast majority of the world's wealth is controlled by a select few — done, Stiglitz argues, at the expense not only of individuals struggling for survival in a stagnant economy but also at the expense of economic stability as a nation and global community.

5 Sections Hidden · 1,380 words
Critical Analysis of Core Arguments320 words
The Stiglitz text ultimately illustrates that the causes of economic inequality in the United States and the global community alike are threefold. According to Stiglitz, "markets weren't working the way they were supposed…
Premise, Relevance, and Evidence310 words
The overarching premise of The Price of Inequality is that the unequal and exploitative nature of the current American economic system is not only ethically wrong but will also lead to a continued unraveling of the U.S. economy and way of life. This view is supported by a…
The Author's Perspective and Personal Affect330 words
The point of view taken by the author is one of the critical and defining features of the work. Despite the reportorial nature of the text, Stiglitz approaches the subject…
The Book's Impact and Reader's View220 words
Reading the text, one finds a strong basis for agreement with most of what the author asserts. There is a sense of social justice underlying the economist's assumptions…
Conclusion and Recommendations200 words
The Price of Inequality is a powerful and important text that brings its reader current on the pressing subject of global and domestic economic inequality. Joseph E. Stiglitz writes with an authoritative voice that ultimately lends…

Works Cited

Chinni, D. (2012). 'The Price of Inequality' and 'The Betrayal of the American Dream.' Jefferson Institute.

[University]. (2013). Curriculum Vitae — Stiglitz. Gsb.columbia.edu.

Edsall, T.B. (2012). Separate and Unequal. The New York Times.

Stiglitz, J.E. (2001). Biographical. The Nobel Foundation.

Stiglitz, J.E. (2012). The Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers Our Future. W.W. Norton & Co.

Stiglitz, J.E. (2013). Student Debt and the Crushing of the American Dream. The New York Times.

Key Concepts in This Paper
Economic Inequality Crony Capitalism Class Mobility Wealth Concentration Public Administration Market Failure Occupy Wall Street Progressive Economics Income Gap Policy Reform
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Book Review: The Price of Inequality by Joseph Stiglitz. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/price-of-inequality-stiglitz-book-review-97003

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.