Racial Bias in Policing: Causes, Evidence, and Solutions
This paper examines the disproportionate use of lethal force by police against Black men in the United States, drawing on data from 2015–2016 that shows African Americans are killed by police at rates far exceeding their share of the population. The paper explores the psychological phenomenon of implicit bias, including findings from Harvard's Project Implicit Attitudes Test and regional variations in racial bias. It also considers contributing factors such as officer stress, cultural socialization, peer and media influence, and situational chaos. The paper concludes by proposing practical reforms, including the use of body cameras, deescalation training, and a broader cultural shift in law enforcement to promote respect and accountability.
- The Scale of the Problem: Police Violence and Racial Disparities: Statistics revealing disproportionate police killings of Black Americans
- Implicit Bias and Its Cultural Roots: Regional racial bias and its link to lethal force
- Situational Factors in Police Shootings: Stress, gender, and chaos as shooting decision factors
- The Reality of Unarmed Shootings and Accountability: Frequency of unarmed shootings and need for reform
- Proposed Solutions: Body Cameras and Deescalation: How body cameras promote officer mindfulness and accountability
- Reforming Police Culture: Cultural change needed in law enforcement training
- Conclusion: Summary of bias, influences, and recommended reforms
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds its argument in concrete statistics — citing the percentage of minority victims and population share — before introducing theoretical explanations, giving the reader an immediate sense of scale and urgency.
- Balances psychological and sociological frameworks by citing both implicit bias research and Bandura's social learning theory, showing that the problem has multiple interacting causes rather than a single explanation.
- Uses a real-world case study (the Black security guard shooting) to illustrate how multiple inputs — race, perceived threat, situational chaos — converge in a fatal moment, making abstract theory concrete.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective integration of empirical sources to support a policy argument. Rather than relying on a single study, it synthesizes findings from criminology, social psychology, and public health research, each contributing a distinct layer to the causal explanation. Citations are used not merely as authority but as evidence that moves the argument forward step by step.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with statistics establishing racial disparity, then explains implicit bias and its cultural origins. A middle section examines situational and external factors using a case study, before turning to the frequency and severity of unarmed shootings. Two solution-focused sections follow — one on body cameras, one on police culture — and a brief conclusion synthesizes the key takeaways. This problem-to-solution arc is clear and logical throughout.
The Scale of the Problem: Police Violence and Racial Disparities
From 2015 to 2016, 1,146 victims of police violence lost their lives. More disturbingly, 38.5% of them were minorities, mainly African Americans (Bui, Coates & Matthay, 2018). This is problematic because African Americans do not even make up 25% of the population of the United States, according to the U.S. Census Bureau (2018). African Americans are nonetheless over 50% more likely to be killed by police than their share of the population would suggest in an equal ratio. Why are Black men more likely to be shot by police than any other demographic?
James (2018) notes simply that "research on police officers has found that they tend to associate African Americans with threat" (p. 30). Yet James (2018) has also noted that implicit bias is not the only factor in determining outcomes when police encounter minorities in the line of work: other variables are impactful. Simple factors such as the amount of sleep an officer had the night before can reduce or inflame that officer's implicit bias with regard to associations between African Americans and the possession of weapons (James, 2018). What this suggests is that there are both conscious and unconscious elements shaping how an officer may handle his own implicit bias — and whether he allows it to master him, or whether he masters it.
Implicit Bias and Its Cultural Roots
Hehman, Flake, and Calanchini (2018) have shown that disproportionate use of lethal force by police officers against Black men has been linked to regional racial biases of residents, as measured by Harvard's Project Implicit — a study that offers participants the opportunity to take an Implicit Attitudes Test. Hehman et al. (2018) argued that the results of these tests across different parts of the country demonstrate that cultural and sociological factors are part of the psychological phenomenon of implicit bias. Some researchers seek to find ways to mitigate the risk of implicit bias by advocating for the use of body cameras or by modifying procedural justice training (Nix, Campbell, Byers & Alpert, 2017), which confirms that this problem is both current and consequential. Yet, as James, Fridell, and Straub (2016) discuss, most psychosocial studies focus on reducing bias without ever fully understanding where the bias originates in the first place.
Situational Factors in Police Shootings
What affects the decision to shoot or not shoot is race-based and rooted in implicit bias in police officers — a bias that stems from cultural and psychological inputs — but it is also determined by other external factors, such as stress and physical circumstances (James, 2018). Racial bias is only one aspect of the situation. Stress, culture, attitudes, and the influence of peers, media, and groups are also factors (Bandura, 2018). Gender is likewise an issue: most Black individuals shot by police are male, as males are generally perceived by officers to carry a higher threat risk than females (Hehman et al., 2018).
Thus, the decision to shoot or not shoot is often made in the heat of the moment based on a convergence of inputs. The case of a Black security guard who was shot by police illustrates how multiple factors can lead to a fatal outcome. The security guard had his gun drawn on a suspect; when a white police officer arrived, he saw the gun — representing a threat of violence — and coupled that perception with the race of the person holding it, which, as a result of implicit bias, also registered as a threat (Hehman et al., 2018). A third input was the chaos of the setting: a bar where violence had broken out. Bystanders were shouting at the officer, and although they were telling him the armed man was a security guard, this had no effect. The officer was unable to communicate effectively with the security guard and opened fire, killing him (Runge & Hall, 2018).
The Reality of Unarmed Shootings and Accountability
As much as it is discussed in the media, fatal police shootings of innocent Black men remain statistically rare in absolute terms. Fewer than 10% of men shot and killed by police in 2015 were unarmed (Nix et al., 2017). Still, this does not excuse the problem — one in ten shootings that should have been avoided is still one too many. Police must find alternative solutions to mitigating the risk of violence.
One solution is the use of body cameras (Nix et al., 2017). Body cameras are helpful because they alert all stakeholders that everything is being recorded and will be made available to the public upon inquiry, allowing communities to see exactly what happened and holding officers accountable. Officers need to understand that they are not above the law but subject to the same law as everyone else. While officers sometimes have to make split-second decisions to save lives — and if a suspect has a weapon and shows no sign of backing down, the officer may be authorized to shoot — there are other ways to reduce stress and prevent situations from escalating to the point where lives are endangered.
Clearing the area could be a first step, isolating the suspect so that no bystanders' lives are in danger. Since officers typically have body armor and can call for backup, the risk to their person is also significantly reduced. Rather than shooting first and asking questions later, officers should attempt to safeguard people in the area, remove them from the scene, and then deescalate by encouraging the suspect to surrender voluntarily. This may require more time, patience, and skill — and more robust training — but it would be worth it if it saves lives.
Conclusion
Black men are disproportionately shot by police compared to any other demographic in America. The Implicit Attitudes Test developed at Harvard has suggested that there is a correlation between the regional beliefs of communities throughout America and the views that officers in these regions hold about Black men and the threat they perceive them to represent. Bandura's work has shown that these beliefs are shaped by peer influence, media influence, and group influence. Stress also plays a role, which means officers need to learn to cope with stress, to think before acting, and to wear body cameras in order to ensure greater mindfulness and accountability in their interactions with the public.
References
Bandura, A. (2018). Toward a psychology of human agency: Pathways and reflections. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 130–136.
Bui, A. L., Coates, M. M., & Matthay, E. C. (2018). Years of life lost due to encounters with law enforcement in the USA, 2015–2016. J Epidemiol Community Health, jech-2017.
Hehman, E., Flake, J. K., & Calanchini, J. (2018). Disproportionate use of lethal force in policing is associated with regional racial biases of residents. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(4), 393–401.
James, L. (2018). The stability of implicit racial bias in police officers. Police Quarterly, 21(1), 30–52.
James, L., Fridell, L., & Straub, F., Jr. (2016). Implicit bias versus the Ferguson effect. Police Chief, 83, 44–51.
Nix, J., Campbell, B. A., Byers, E. H., & Alpert, G. P. (2017). A bird's eye view of civilians killed by police in 2015: Further evidence of implicit bias. Criminology & Public Policy, 16(1), 309–340.
Runge, E., & Hall, G. (2018). Officer shoots, kills armed security guard outside south suburban bar. Retrieved from https://wgntv.com/2018/11/11/multiple-wounded-in-robbins-bar-shooting-police-say/
U.S. Census Bureau. (2018). Population of the United States by race and Hispanic/Latino origin, Census 2000 and 2010. Retrieved from https://www.infoplease.com/us/race-population/population-united-states-race-and-hispaniclatino-origin-census-2000-and-2010
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.