Police Brutality and Use of Force: Causes and Solutions
This paper examines the persistent problem of police brutality and excessive use of force in the United States, exploring both the scope of the issue and evidence-based solutions for addressing it. Drawing on data regarding racial disparities in police killings and officer-reported misconduct, the paper analyzes four primary intervention strategies: body-worn cameras, unconscious bias training, community policing, and civilian oversight mechanisms such as review boards. For each approach, the paper weighs documented benefits against practical limitations and outlines steps to overcome those drawbacks. The paper concludes with concrete recommendations for policy reform, mandatory training components, and transparency measures designed to rebuild public trust and reduce incidents of police violence.
- Introduction: Overview of police force complexity and accountability gaps
- Problem Statement: Defines the problem and lists proposed solution categories
- Different Perspectives and Statistics: Data on police killings, racial disparities, and officer misconduct
- Potential Solutions: Five evidence-based approaches to reducing police brutality
- Moving Forward: Addressing Police Brutality as a Community: Why addressing police brutality matters for communities
- Body-Worn Cameras: Pros and cons of BWC programs for accountability
- Addressing Unconscious Bias Through Training: How bias training can reshape officer behavior
- Civilian Oversight: Forms and effectiveness of independent police oversight
- Recommendations for Positive Ways to Address the Issue: Concrete policy steps to reduce police use of force
- Conclusion: Summary of key findings and call to action
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Systematically applies a pros-and-cons framework to each proposed solution, giving the analysis balance and intellectual honesty rather than simply advocating for reforms without acknowledging limitations.
- Grounds claims in concrete empirical data — including the Washington Post fatal force database and a 40-year Lancet study on racial disparities — lending credibility to the problem statement before moving to solutions.
- Concludes with actionable, specific recommendations (e.g., mandatory bias training components, required body-cam policies, independent oversight authority) rather than vague calls for change.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of a structured problem-solution argumentative framework. Each solution is introduced with a definition, supported with scholarly citations, analyzed for both benefits and drawbacks, and then connected to a broader recommendation section that synthesizes all four interventions. This technique shows evaluative thinking rather than simple description.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an introduction and problem statement that establish scope and urgency. A statistics section quantifies the issue using national data. Four solution categories — body-worn cameras, unconscious bias training, community policing, and civilian oversight — are each given dedicated sections with explicit pros and cons. An "Addressing the Cons" section bridges analysis to policy. The paper closes with a recommendations section and a summary conclusion, following a clear funnel structure from problem to evidence to solutions to action.
Introduction
Police use of force and police brutality are complex and multifaceted issues that have garnered significant attention in recent years. There are many factors that contribute to these issues, including the way in which police are trained, the policies and procedures that govern their behavior, and the cultural and societal context in which they operate.
One of the key issues related to police use of force is the lack of clear and consistent guidelines for when and how much force is appropriate (Engel et al., 2020). Different police departments and jurisdictions may have different policies in place, and officers may also have discretion in determining the appropriate level of force in a given situation. This lack of clarity can lead to confusion and misunderstandings, and can also make it difficult for officers to effectively de-escalate situations.
Another key issue is the lack of transparency and accountability in cases where police use excessive force or engage in brutality (Morton, 2018). In many cases, there are insufficient systems in place to ensure that officers are held accountable for their actions, which can contribute to a culture of impunity and further undermine trust in the police. This paper examines these issues and discusses ways in which the problem of police brutality may be positively addressed.
Problem Statement
Police brutality and excessive use of force have long been a problem in the United States, with devastating consequences for individuals, communities, and the reputation and credibility of the police (Bennell et al., 2021). Despite efforts to address these issues, they persist, and there is a need for more effective solutions that can help reduce the frequency and severity of incidents of police violence.
It is the aim of this paper to show that implementing body-worn cameras and providing unconscious bias training for police officers are evidence-based solutions that have the potential to significantly reduce incidents of police brutality and excessive use of force, but they must be implemented and used effectively in order to be successful.
This paper also touches upon other potential solutions included in this analysis, such as:
- Improved training and education for police officers, including training in de-escalation, conflict resolution, and cultural competency.
- More effective policies and procedures governing the use of force, including clear guidelines for when and how much force is appropriate.
- Greater transparency and accountability in cases where police use excessive force or engage in brutality, including the establishment of independent oversight bodies such as civilian review boards or independent investigators.
- Community policing approaches that focus on building trust and partnerships between police and the communities they serve.
- Civilian oversight to help ensure a proper review of police actions.
It is important to note that addressing police brutality and excessive use of force will likely require a combination of these and other solutions, and that these solutions must be implemented and supported at all levels of the criminal justice system, including local, state, and federal agencies.
Different Perspectives and Statistics
It is difficult to accurately quantify the prevalence of police brutality and excessive use of force, as these incidents are often underreported and may not be accurately recorded. However, some studies and reports have attempted to shed light on the extent of these problems.
According to data from the Washington Post (2022), as of December 2021, police in the United States had killed over 6,800 people since 2015, averaging approximately one thousand people every year. This includes individuals who were unarmed, as well as those who were armed but did not pose a serious threat to the officers or others.
A report published in The Lancet found that Black Americans are significantly more likely to be killed by police than white Americans. A study conducted over a 40-year period from 1980 to 2019 found that Black Americans were 3.5 times more likely to be killed by police than white Americans (IHME, 2021).
A study by the National Institute of Justice found that about half of police officers surveyed had witnessed colleagues using excessive force on suspects, and about a third had personally used more force than they believed was necessary, while police integrity as a whole was questioned (Stinson et al., 2016).
It is important to note that these statistics likely underestimate the true prevalence of police brutality and excessive use of force, as many incidents go unreported or are not accurately recorded. However, they do provide a glimpse into the scale of these problems and highlight the need for effective solutions.
One stance on this problem is that police use of force should only be exercised when necessary, and that law enforcement officers should receive extensive training in de-escalation practices and methods of responding to situations with minimal physical force. Another stance is that unconscious bias is a problem that needs to be addressed to curb excessive use of force scenarios (Morrow & Shjarback, 2019).
In addition, it has been argued that independent oversight agencies must be established to ensure that instances of excessive violence by officers are properly investigated and, if necessary, addressed through civilian legal processes (Holliday & Wagstaff, 2022). Furthermore, increased funding for community policing initiatives provides an opportunity for the development of positive relationships between citizens and law enforcement professionals (Jones, 2019). Ultimately, understanding the nuances of the current situation and exploring potential solutions requires ongoing dialogue at all levels in order to promote equity in our communities.
References
Bennell, C., Alpert, G., Andersen, J. P., Arpaia, J., Huhta, J. M., Kahn, K. B., ... & White, M. D. (2021). Advancing police use of force research and practice: Urgent issues and prospects. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 26(2), 121–144.
Blumberg, D. M., Schlosser, M. D., Papazoglou, K., Creighton, S., & Kaye, C. C. (2019). New directions in police academy training: A call to action. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(24), 4941.
Doane, E., & Cumberland, D. M. (2018). Community policing: Using needs assessment to gain understanding before implementing. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 31(2), 165–187.
Engel, R. S., McManus, H. D., & Isaza, G. T. (2020). Moving beyond "best practice": Experiences in police reform and a call for evidence to reduce officer-involved shootings. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 687(1), 146–165.
Headley, A. M. (2021). Accountability and police use of force: Interactive effects between minority representation and civilian review boards. Public Management Review, 1–23.
Holliday, B. S., & Wagstaff, J. H. (2022). The relationship between citizen oversight and procedural justice measures in policing: An exploratory study. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 47(3), 567–588.
IHME. (2021). The Lancet. Retrieved from
Jones, N. A., Ruddell, R., & Summerfield, T. (2019). Community policing: Perceptions of officers policing Indigenous communities. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 61(1), 41–65.
Laming, E. (2019). Police use of body worn cameras. Police Practice and Research, 20(2), 201–216.
Morrow, W. J., & Shjarback, J. A. (2019). Police worldviews, unconscious bias, and their potential to contribute to racial and ethnic disparities in New York Police Department (NYPD) stops for reason of "furtive movement." Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 17(3), 269–298.
Morton, D. R. (2018). Improving police transparency and accountability in violent encounters with African Americans. Journal of African American Studies, 22(1), 125–138.
Stinson, P. M., Liederbach, J., & Brewer, S. L., Jr. (2016). Police integrity lost: A study of law enforcement officers arrested.
Washington Post. (2022). Fatal force. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/investigations/police-shootings-database/
Wood, G., Tyler, T. R., & Papachristos, A. V. (2020). Procedural justice training reduces police use of force and complaints against officers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(18), 9815–9821.
Wolfe, S., Rojek, J., McLean, K., & Alpert, G. (2020). Social interaction training to reduce police use of force. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 687(1), 124–145.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.