Police Brutality and Use of Force: Causes and Solutions

Introduction

Police use of force and police brutality are complex and multifaceted issues that have garnered significant attention in recent years. There are many factors that contribute to these issues, including the way in which police are trained, the policies and procedures that govern their behavior, and the cultural and societal context in which they operate.

One of the key issues related to police use of force is the lack of clear and consistent guidelines for when and how much force is appropriate (Engel et al., 2020). Different police departments and jurisdictions may have different policies in place, and officers may also have discretion in determining the appropriate level of force in a given situation. This lack of clarity can lead to confusion and misunderstandings, and can also make it difficult for officers to effectively de-escalate situations.

Another key issue is the lack of transparency and accountability in cases where police use excessive force or engage in brutality (Morton, 2018). In many cases, there are insufficient systems in place to ensure that officers are held accountable for their actions, which can contribute to a culture of impunity and further undermine trust in the police. This paper examines these issues and discusses ways in which the problem of police brutality may be positively addressed.

Problem Statement

Police brutality and excessive use of force have long been a problem in the United States, with devastating consequences for individuals, communities, and the reputation and credibility of the police (Bennell et al., 2021). Despite efforts to address these issues, they persist, and there is a need for more effective solutions that can help reduce the frequency and severity of incidents of police violence.

It is the aim of this paper to show that implementing body-worn cameras and providing unconscious bias training for police officers are evidence-based solutions that have the potential to significantly reduce incidents of police brutality and excessive use of force, but they must be implemented and used effectively in order to be successful.

This paper also touches upon other potential solutions included in this analysis, such as:

It is important to note that addressing police brutality and excessive use of force will likely require a combination of these and other solutions, and that these solutions must be implemented and supported at all levels of the criminal justice system, including local, state, and federal agencies.

Different Perspectives and Statistics

It is difficult to accurately quantify the prevalence of police brutality and excessive use of force, as these incidents are often underreported and may not be accurately recorded. However, some studies and reports have attempted to shed light on the extent of these problems.

According to data from the Washington Post (2022), as of December 2021, police in the United States had killed over 6,800 people since 2015, averaging approximately one thousand people every year. This includes individuals who were unarmed, as well as those who were armed but did not pose a serious threat to the officers or others.

A report published in The Lancet found that Black Americans are significantly more likely to be killed by police than white Americans. A study conducted over a 40-year period from 1980 to 2019 found that Black Americans were 3.5 times more likely to be killed by police than white Americans (IHME, 2021).

A study by the National Institute of Justice found that about half of police officers surveyed had witnessed colleagues using excessive force on suspects, and about a third had personally used more force than they believed was necessary, while police integrity as a whole was questioned (Stinson et al., 2016).

It is important to note that these statistics likely underestimate the true prevalence of police brutality and excessive use of force, as many incidents go unreported or are not accurately recorded. However, they do provide a glimpse into the scale of these problems and highlight the need for effective solutions.

One stance on this problem is that police use of force should only be exercised when necessary, and that law enforcement officers should receive extensive training in de-escalation practices and methods of responding to situations with minimal physical force. Another stance is that unconscious bias is a problem that needs to be addressed to curb excessive use of force scenarios (Morrow & Shjarback, 2019).

In addition, it has been argued that independent oversight agencies must be established to ensure that instances of excessive violence by officers are properly investigated and, if necessary, addressed through civilian legal processes (Holliday & Wagstaff, 2022). Furthermore, increased funding for community policing initiatives provides an opportunity for the development of positive relationships between citizens and law enforcement professionals (Jones, 2019). Ultimately, understanding the nuances of the current situation and exploring potential solutions requires ongoing dialogue at all levels in order to promote equity in our communities.

Potential Solutions

There are a number of potential solutions that have been proposed to address these issues, including:

Improved training and education: Police officers should receive training on how to de-escalate situations and use force only as a last resort. This could include training in conflict resolution, communication skills, social interaction, and cultural competency (Wolfe et al., 2020).

More effective policies and procedures: Police departments should establish clear policies and procedures governing the use of force, and should ensure that officers are held to account when they violate these policies (Blumberg et al., 2019).

Greater transparency and accountability: Police departments should be more transparent about their use-of-force policies and procedures, and should make it easier for the public to access information about incidents of police brutality and excessive force (Wood et al., 2020).

Community policing: Community policing approaches that focus on building trust and partnerships between police and the communities they serve can help to reduce tension and improve relationships between police and the public (Doane & Cumberland, 2018).

Independent oversight: Independent oversight bodies, such as civilian review boards or independent investigators, can help to ensure that police are held accountable for their actions and that incidents of police brutality are thoroughly investigated (Headley, 2021).

Moving Forward: Addressing Police Brutality as a Community

Police brutality and excessive use of force are serious problems that need to be addressed for a number of reasons.

First and foremost, police brutality and excessive use of force violate the rights of individuals and can cause serious physical harm, including injury and death. When police use excessive force, it can have a detrimental impact on the individuals who are subjected to it, as well as their families and communities.

Secondly, police brutality and excessive use of force can undermine trust in the police and erode the relationship between the police and the communities they serve. This is especially true in communities of color, which may have a long history of negative interactions with the police and may be more skeptical of law enforcement.

Finally, police brutality and excessive use of force can have negative impacts on the reputation and credibility of the police, which can make it more difficult for officers to do their jobs effectively and can undermine public confidence in the criminal justice system more broadly.

In short, addressing police brutality and excessive use of force is important for the well-being and safety of individuals, for building trust and positive relationships between the police and the communities they serve, and for maintaining the credibility and integrity of the police and the criminal justice system.

Body-Worn Cameras

Body-worn cameras (BWCs) are small, portable cameras that can be attached to an officer's uniform or other gear. They are designed to capture video and audio footage of police interactions with the public, with the goal of providing an objective record of what happened.

There is evidence to suggest that body-worn cameras can help reduce police violence in several ways (Laming, 2019).

Increased accountability: BWCs provide an objective record of police interactions with the public, which can help hold officers accountable for their actions. This can deter officers from using excessive force, as they know their actions will be recorded.

De-escalation: The presence of a BWC can often help de-escalate tense situations, as both the officer and the person they are interacting with may be more mindful of their behavior when they know they are being recorded.

Improved community relationships: BWCs can help increase transparency and build trust between police and the communities they serve by providing a clear record of police interactions.

Evidence: BWC footage can be used as evidence in criminal cases or internal investigations, helping to establish what happened in a particular incident.

It is important to note, however, that BWCs are not a panacea for reducing police violence. They are just one tool among many that can help address this complex issue, and it is also important that they are implemented and used in a way that respects the privacy and rights of the people being recorded.

Cost: Implementing and maintaining a body-worn camera program can be expensive, especially if it involves purchasing and replacing cameras and storing large amounts of data.

Privacy concerns: Some people may be concerned about their privacy being violated if they are recorded by a body-worn camera, especially in sensitive or personal situations.

Limited impact: While BWCs can be an important tool in reducing excessive use of force, they are not a panacea and may not be effective in all situations.

Technical issues: Body-worn cameras can sometimes malfunction or fail to record, which can compromise their usefulness as an objective record of events.

Overall, while body-worn cameras can be a useful tool in reducing police excessive use of force, it is important to carefully consider the costs and benefits of implementing a BWC program and to ensure that they are used in a way that respects the privacy and rights of the people being recorded.

Conclusion

Police brutality and excessive use of force are problems for many reasons. First and foremost, they represent a violation of civil rights and a threat to public safety. Police are supposed to protect and serve our communities, not use excessive force to intimidate or oppress people. Second, such conduct can lead to serious injury and even death, causing physical and emotional trauma as well as long-term psychological damage. Finally, police brutality undermines public trust in law enforcement, making people feel unsafe and unfairly targeted, which can lead to a lack of cooperation with police and a pervasive sense of distrust and fear in the community.

There are several ways to address this problem. Requiring police officers to wear body cams while on duty will ensure that any excessive use of force is documented and can be used as evidence. Providing training to police officers to recognize and counteract their unconscious biases can reduce discrimination and excessive use of force. Improving transparency between police departments and the public — by releasing data on police stops, use of force, and other interactions — is equally critical. Community policing can help build relationships and trust between police officers and the public, reducing tensions and making police more responsive to community needs. De-escalation training can provide officers with the techniques and tactics needed to resolve conflicts without resorting to excessive force. Finally, establishing civilian review boards to investigate complaints of police misconduct and excessive use of force will help ensure that officers are held accountable for their actions.

Ultimately, police brutality and use of force are issues that can be addressed effectively with the right combination of positive steps — including the wearing of body cams, additional training, and meaningful assistance from the community.

References

Bennell, C., Alpert, G., Andersen, J. P., Arpaia, J., Huhta, J. M., Kahn, K. B., ... & White, M. D. (2021). Advancing police use of force research and practice: Urgent issues and prospects. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 26(2), 121–144.

Blumberg, D. M., Schlosser, M. D., Papazoglou, K., Creighton, S., & Kaye, C. C. (2019). New directions in police academy training: A call to action. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(24), 4941.

Doane, E., & Cumberland, D. M. (2018). Community policing: Using needs assessment to gain understanding before implementing. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 31(2), 165–187.

Engel, R. S., McManus, H. D., & Isaza, G. T. (2020). Moving beyond "best practice": Experiences in police reform and a call for evidence to reduce officer-involved shootings. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 687(1), 146–165.

Headley, A. M. (2021). Accountability and police use of force: Interactive effects between minority representation and civilian review boards. Public Management Review, 1–23.

Holliday, B. S., & Wagstaff, J. H. (2022). The relationship between citizen oversight and procedural justice measures in policing: An exploratory study. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 47(3), 567–588.

IHME. (2021). The Lancet. Retrieved from

Jones, N. A., Ruddell, R., & Summerfield, T. (2019). Community policing: Perceptions of officers policing Indigenous communities. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 61(1), 41–65.

Laming, E. (2019). Police use of body worn cameras. Police Practice and Research, 20(2), 201–216.

Morrow, W. J., & Shjarback, J. A. (2019). Police worldviews, unconscious bias, and their potential to contribute to racial and ethnic disparities in New York Police Department (NYPD) stops for reason of "furtive movement." Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 17(3), 269–298.

Morton, D. R. (2018). Improving police transparency and accountability in violent encounters with African Americans. Journal of African American Studies, 22(1), 125–138.

Stinson, P. M., Liederbach, J., & Brewer, S. L., Jr. (2016). Police integrity lost: A study of law enforcement officers arrested.

Washington Post. (2022). Fatal force. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/investigations/police-shootings-database/

Wood, G., Tyler, T. R., & Papachristos, A. V. (2020). Procedural justice training reduces police use of force and complaints against officers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(18), 9815–9821.

Wolfe, S., Rojek, J., McLean, K., & Alpert, G. (2020). Social interaction training to reduce police use of force. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 687(1), 124–145.