Religion, Forgiveness, and Counseling: Values in Practice
This paper presents summaries, critical analyses, and practical applications of two counseling studies. The first, by Zinnbauer and Pargament (2000), examines how counselors approach clients' religious concerns through four frameworks — rejectionism, exclusivism, constructivism, and pluralism — and recommends the latter two for fostering open, client-centered dialogue. The second, by Malone et al. (2011), investigates the relationships among forgiveness, stress, and social support, finding that higher stress and lower social support correlate with reduced willingness to forgive. The paper critically evaluates methodological limitations of the online survey used by Malone et al. and applies both studies' findings to practical counseling strategies.
- Working with Religious Concerns in Counseling: Counselor values and religion in sessions
- Four Approaches to Religion in Therapy: Rejectionism, exclusivism, constructivism, and pluralism explained
- Critical Reflection on Religious Values and Authenticity: Counselor values inevitably surface despite methodology
- Applying Constructivism and Pluralism in Practice: How counselors can genuinely internalize pluralism
- Forgiveness, Stress, and Social Support: Study links forgiveness to stress and social support
- Critical Analysis of the Malone et al. Study: Online survey limitations and self-report reliability concerns
- Applying Forgiveness Research to Counseling Practice: Using forgiveness findings to support clients therapeutically
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Each source is addressed in a consistent three-part structure — summary, critical reflection, and application — giving the paper clear internal logic and making it easy to follow.
- The critical sections demonstrate genuine independent thinking, particularly the observation that a counselor's true values will "seep through" regardless of adopted methodology, and the pointed critique of online survey reliability.
- The application sections connect academic findings directly to real counseling practice, showing the student can bridge theory and professional use.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper models source engagement with evaluative distance: it accurately summarizes each study before stepping back to question its assumptions or limitations. This two-step move — faithful representation followed by independent critique — is a core graduate-level skill in counseling literature reviews.
Structure breakdown
The paper is divided into two parallel units, each covering one source. Unit one (Zinnbauer & Pargament) covers religious approaches in counseling, the author's reflections on authenticity, and practical suggestions for internalizing pluralism. Unit two (Malone et al.) covers forgiveness and well-being research, methodological critique of the online survey, and applied counseling implications. References follow standard APA formatting.
Working with Religious Concerns in Counseling
A counselor ontologically stands in a different mode from the client and holds his or her own values. This necessarily extends to religion — or the lack of it — and the problem may be that even though a counselor seeks not to impose those values on the client, they can covertly seep through and influence or even repel the client. Many counselors address this problem by adopting a guiding methodology. For instance, a counselor may choose the humanistic approach and closely adhere to Carl Rogers's prescription of assuming a non-judgmental, client-centered position while refraining from directing the client in any particular way. Humanism is a broad approach that refers to counseling methodology in general.
Religion is a subject that may, to some extent, creep into counseling sessions. According to Zinnbauer and Pargament (2000), there are four archetypes through which counselors may choose to address religious concerns.
References
Malone, A., Meyer, D. D., Tarlton, T., Wasielewski, L., Reuben, P., West, C., & Mitchell, V. (2011). The relationship between forgiveness and emotional well-being. Retrieved from http://counselingoutfitters.com/vistas/vistas11/Article23.pdf
Zinnbauer, B. J., & Pargament, K. I. (2000). Working with the sacred. Journal of Counseling and Practice, 78, 601–609.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.