Situational Leadership for Emergency Department Communication
This paper examines inter-professional communication challenges in hospital emergency departments, with a particular focus on the tumultuous atmosphere that impedes effective teamwork among nurses, physicians, and technicians. It identifies key barriers—including overcrowding, stress, ineffective management, and poor communication channels—and reviews evidence-based solutions such as post-event debriefing and competency-based teamwork training. The paper then argues that situational leadership, with its flexible, follower-centered approach, is the most effective leadership framework for implementing these solutions. Drawing on the practitioner-scholar model, it outlines practical strategies including daily huddles, motivational reinforcement, delegation aligned with follower development, and structured weekly progress reporting to foster a cohesive inter-professional environment.
- Introduction: Inter-Professional Communication in Emergency Departments: Defines the inter-professional communication problem in emergency departments
- Barriers to Effective Teamwork in the Emergency Department: Identifies overcrowding, stress, and conflict as key barriers
- Evidence-Based Solutions to Inter-Professional Challenges: Reviews debriefing and competency-based teamwork as solutions
- Situational Leadership as a Framework for Change: Introduces situational leadership theory and historical examples
- Applying Situational Leadership in Practice: Outlines how to implement leadership strategies with the team
- Measuring Progress and Reporting Outcomes: Describes criteria and reporting methods for tracking improvement
- Conclusion: Calls for practical situational leadership adoption in healthcare
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper moves logically from problem identification to barrier analysis to solution recommendation, giving it a clear and persuasive argumentative arc.
- It grounds abstract leadership theory in concrete healthcare context, using specific historical leaders (Summitt, Eisenhower) as illustrative examples of situational leadership in action.
- The practitioner-scholar model is woven into the leadership strategy, reinforcing the paper's emphasis on evidence-based, reflective practice rather than purely theoretical prescription.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively bridges theory and application by first synthesizing existing research on communication barriers and solutions, then proposing a specific leadership model (situational leadership) as the implementation vehicle. This structure—literature synthesis followed by applied framework—is a hallmark of professional and graduate-level healthcare management writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a problem statement identifying the chaotic emergency department atmosphere as a communication barrier. It then surveys causes and consequences, reviews scholarly solutions (debriefing, competency-based learning), introduces situational leadership theory with historical examples, details how the author would apply it as a team leader, and closes with a progress-measurement and reporting framework before a brief conclusion. Seven sections move the argument from diagnosis to prescription.
Introduction: Inter-Professional Communication in Emergency Departments
For health care professionals to fulfill their duties effectively and deliver quality service to patients, inter-professional communication among hospital personnel must be strong and fluid. While a sense of professional territory naturally exists within each discipline, it should not become a barrier to collaboration among health workers from different backgrounds. There is a need to formulate a working communication strategy to address the persistent inter-professional problems in hospital environments generally, and in the emergency department in particular.
As critical as this issue is, a review of inter-professional communication in emergency departments reveals a seemingly unfavorable situation among practitioners working in one of the most significant subsectors of the health profession (Varjoshani, Hosseini, Khankeh, & Ahmadi, 2014). Among the numerous issues affecting the department, this paper examines the problem of the boisterous atmosphere in the emergency department, explores the contributing barriers to this persistent problem, and formulates a leadership strategy designed to produce a lasting solution.
Barriers to Effective Teamwork in the Emergency Department
Effective healthcare delivery in the emergency department requires a carefully selected team of qualified personnel, including nurses, physicians, and technicians. As in any working environment, these inter-professional team members need a highly committed team spirit to work successfully. Unfortunately, the rowdy atmosphere in the department has been a significant hindrance to effective inter-professional teamwork among medical personnel. Varjoshani et al. (2014) highlighted the causes of this tumultuous environment as including overcrowded emergency departments, stressful working conditions, ineffective management, and inefficient communication channels.
For instance, an overcrowded emergency department is a major information barrier that prevents effective data exchange between physicians and nurses, and in some cases causes friction among practitioners in the course of their duties. Beyond that, overcrowding typically leads to both physical and emotional stress for personnel, which can in turn result in errors, overreactions, and other unprofessional conduct. Records indicate that, among all hospital departments, the emergency department is where most medical errors occur (Varjoshani et al., 2014). The critical condition of patients requires many professionals to be present simultaneously, which can cause communication failures responsible for role conflict, ambiguity, interpersonal power struggles, and other inter-professional disputes commonly witnessed in the health sector. Studies have traced the root of these problems to factors that, according to Morley & Cashell (2017), include "compensation schemes, professional practice regulation, institutional policies, and the physical environment factors which may be beyond the control of the team."
References
Gluyas, H. (2015). Effective communication and teamwork promotes patient safety. Nursing Standard (2014+), 29(49), 50.
Kessler, D., Cheng, A., & Mullan, P. (2014). Debriefing in the emergency department. Annals of Emergency Medicine.
Morley, L., & Cashell, A. (2017). Collaboration in health care. Continuing Medical Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, 48, 207–216.
Northouse, P. G. (2016). Leadership theory and practice (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Peterson, R. L., Peterson, D. R., Abrams, J. C., Stricker, G., & Ducheny, K. (2015). Training in clinical psychology in the United States: Practitioner model. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 517–523).
Varjoshani, N. J., Hosseini, M. A., Khankeh, H. R., & Ahmadi, F. (2014). Tumultuous atmosphere (physical, mental), the main barrier to emergency department inter-professional communication. Global Journal of Health Science, 7, 1916–9744.
What is situational leadership? (2014). Retrieved from http://online.stu.edu/articles/education/what-is-situational-leadership.aspx
Already a member? Log in
Unlock the rest of this paper
135,000+ research papers · AI writing tools · Plagiarism & AI detection
7-Day Pass
Does not renew
Get 7-Day PassMonthly
Renews at $12.99/month until canceled
Start MonthlyAnnual
Renews at $99/year until canceled
Start Annual- Unlimited AI writing tools
- Plagiarism and AI text detection tool
Plan details
Unlimited AI writing tools are for individual, non-automated use and are subject to our Terms of Service and abuse-prevention measures.
TextChecker scans: 3 during the 7-Day Pass, or 5 per month with Monthly and Annual.
Prices exclude applicable tax.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.