Special Education Classroom Observation Portfolio Reflection
This reflection paper presents a four-session observation portfolio completed in special education classroom settings. Each session examines a distinct student population and disability category, including intellectual disabilities, autism spectrum disorder, physical disabilities, specific learning disabilities, and dyscalculia. The paper connects observed instructional strategies — such as positive reinforcement, scaffolded instruction, systematic instruction, task-based learning, and mindfulness interventions — to theoretical frameworks including Vygotsky's zone of proximal development and Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences. Critical reviews follow each observation, identifying effective practices and areas for improvement, and the conclusion compares the author's observations with those of peers in similar special education settings.
- Introduction: Overview of four special education observation sessions
- Observation 1: Intellectual Disabilities and Autism Spectrum Disorder: Morning session on ASD, intellectual disability, and reinforcement
- Observation 2: Physical Disabilities and Writing Instruction: Writing class with physically disabled students using task-based learning
- Observation 3: Specific Learning Disabilities and Behavioral Strategies: Lunch-period session covering specific learning disability strategies
- Observation 4: Dyscalculia and Mathematics Instruction: Afternoon math class addressing dyscalculia and mindfulness
- Conclusion: Comparison of observations with peers and future teaching goals
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Each observation section follows a consistent three-part structure — summary, theoretical connection, and critical review — giving the portfolio a clear and repeatable organizational logic.
- The author effectively bridges observed classroom practice with named disability categories and evidence-based instructional strategies from a single authoritative textbook source (Hallahan et al., 2018), demonstrating applied comprehension rather than abstract recitation.
- Critical review sections add reflective depth by identifying not only what worked but also what the host teacher could have done differently, showing evaluative thinking beyond description.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses observational evidence as the primary warrant for each theoretical claim. Rather than stating general principles in isolation, the author anchors every concept — positive reinforcement, ZPD, systematic instruction, Gardner's intelligences — to a specific, concrete moment witnessed in the classroom. This evidence-to-concept structure is characteristic of strong reflective academic writing in education programs.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief introduction establishing the four-session framework. Four parallel body sections each cover one observation: classroom demographics and activities, disability-category analysis, instructional strategies observed, and a critical review. A conclusion synthesizes cross-observation comparisons with peer observations. The reference list follows APA format with three sources.
Introduction
This observation portfolio presents a summary of my experience and knowledge gained from analyzing four observation sessions in a special education classroom setting. Observation 1 and Observation 2 were conducted in the morning, Observation 3 took place during lunch break, and Observation 4 was conducted in the afternoon. Each of the four observation sessions is discussed below.
Observation 1: Intellectual Disabilities and Autism Spectrum Disorder
Observation Summary
The class consisted of nine students; eight were male and one was female. During my observation, I walked around and watched as the students began each morning with snacks, milk, and orange juice for breakfast, followed by typing lessons, mathematics lessons, group calendar practice, and personal information binders. Before starting the mathematics lesson, the students played a game as a way to facilitate a smooth transition from one activity to another. Personal information binders included practicing name, age, phone number, address, and birthday, as well as identifying days of the week — specifically today and yesterday.
The majority of the students had difficulties in social interaction, attention, and communication, and displayed repetitive and unusual behaviors. In addition, four of the students avoided eye contact with the host teacher. Overall, the class was very quiet because the students had poor social skills and rarely talked to each other.
The host teacher used visual aids depicting plates, cups, and cooking utensils to teach vocabulary signs, and written cues such as police officer, earthquake, and security to teach vocabulary in an emergency reading comprehension context. Visual aids and written cues helped the students communicate, learn, and develop self-control.
The host teacher demonstrated strong communication skills when teaching students. In order for a teacher to be successful, they must express themselves both verbally and nonverbally in a clear, concise, and engaging manner. Research shows that successful teachers communicate clearly and directly, possess good listening skills, and respond calmly to student behaviors that could disrupt the lesson. For example, during the lesson, one student was using Facebook instead of completing the fill-in-the-blank questions on the document. The host teacher walked slowly toward the student and asked to see her progress. The student claimed she was confused, but after the host teacher explained what the assignment involved, the student began completing the questions.
The behavioral strategy I observed the host teacher using on most occasions was positive reinforcement (Hallahan, Kauffman, & Pullen, 2018) — that is, strengthening a behavior by providing a consequence the individual finds rewarding, thereby making it more likely that the individual will engage in the behavior again. The teacher used praise and tokens to reward students who displayed appropriate behaviors. The teacher also avoided situations in which unwanted behaviors were likely to occur.
How My Experience Correlates with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Intellectual Disabilities
Seven of the students I observed had significant limitations in attention, social cognition, and communication — the behavioral characteristics associated with intellectual disability. According to Hallahan et al. (2018), intellectual disability refers to a "disability characterized by significant limitations both in intellectual functioning and in adaptive behavior as expressed in conceptual, social, and practical adaptive skills." It is also known as mental retardation.
Learning considerations for students with intellectual disabilities often include reinforcement and systematic instruction. Systematic instruction refers to a teaching method that is repeatable and learnable through a step-by-step procedure (Hallahan et al., 2018). Any teacher who wishes to use this method should always have a plan. The plan should incorporate the student's special needs, abilities, and interests; the subject matter to be taught; and the instructional materials to be used. Reinforcement involves the use of either tokens or verbal praise following a desired behavior. I observed the host teacher using praise such as "good reading" to reinforce desired behaviors in students. A student who can associate praise with good reading is likely to develop strong reading skills in the future.
Four of the nine students I observed exhibited repetitive and unusual behaviors and language deficits (echolalia), which are symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). ASD is a spectrum disorder because it affects people in different ways. I also noticed that one of the students had Dandy-Walker Malformation. Echolalia can be defined as "the parroting repetition of words or phrases either immediately after they are heard or later" (Hallahan et al., 2018). Dandy-Walker Malformation (DWM) refers to a human brain malformation that occurs during embryonic development.
According to Hallahan et al. (2018), education strategies for students with ASD should include the following: (1) direct instruction of skills, (2) behavior management, and (3) instruction in a natural setting. Students with ASD display random and unusual behaviors — such as hitting and screaming — especially in new and stimulating environments. Teachers are therefore encouraged to use a combination of functional behavioral assessment (FBA) and positive behavioral intervention and support (PBIS) to reduce or eliminate inappropriate behaviors. The host teacher used pictures to initiate and maintain functional communication, especially when teaching vocabulary signs.
Critical Review
After this observation session, I engaged the host teacher in conversation. From our interaction, I learned about Vygotsky's zone of proximal development (ZPD) and scaffolded instruction. The ZPD is defined as "the distance between the actual development level as determined by independent problem solving and the level of potential development as determined through problem solving under adult guidance or in collaboration with a more capable peer" (Shabani, Khatib, & Ebadi, 2010). The host teacher emphasized that learning tasks should be within a student's ZPD. She also emphasized that learning occurs only when a student can complete a task without the help of a teacher. In scaffolded instruction, the teacher provides support to students when they are first learning tasks and then gradually reduces it so that the students can complete the tasks independently (Hallahan et al., 2018).
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.