Truancy Case Management: Service Plan for a Teen Truant
This paper presents a structured case management plan for Steve Z., a 15-year-old student referred to family court for chronic unexcused absenteeism. Drawing on the Adolescent Diversion Program (ADP) and the Youth Assessment and Screening Instrument (YASI), the plan outlines four core components: an individualized service plan, coordination of appropriate services, progress monitoring, and client advocacy through pretrial diversion. The paper identifies both familial and personal factors underlying the student's truancy and proposes community-based interventions aligned with NAPSA performance standards to reduce delinquency risk and support successful school reintegration.
- Introduction: Understanding the Truancy Problem: Background, causes, and context of Steve's truancy
- Service Plan Development: YASI-based assessment and individualized case planning
- Coordination of Client to Appropriate Services: ADP resource coordinator and service delivery model
- Monitoring Client Progress: Compliance checks and informal conferences between hearings
- Advocacy and Pretrial Diversion: Community-based diversion and NAPSA standards for intervention
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Applies a clear, structured four-part case management framework directly to a specific referral case, making abstract policy concepts concrete and actionable.
- Grounds recommendations in named instruments and programs (YASI, ADP, NAPSA standards), demonstrating familiarity with real-world juvenile justice tools.
- Identifies both familial and personal root causes of truancy before prescribing interventions, showing causal reasoning rather than surface-level problem-solving.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses a case-based applied analysis structure: it introduces a referral scenario, diagnoses contributing factors, and then maps each stage of intervention (planning, coordination, monitoring, advocacy) to established professional frameworks. This technique is common in social work and criminal justice writing, where theory must translate directly into practice recommendations.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a case summary that establishes the subject's background and the factors driving truancy. It then moves through four numbered sections mirroring a standard case management workflow. Each section references a specific program, instrument, or legal standard, building a complete intervention pathway from initial assessment through advocacy and potential charge diversion.
Introduction: Understanding the Truancy Problem
The subject in this case is Steve Z., a 15-year-old chronic absentee who regularly skips school without a valid reason. He has received a referral to a family court, which has ordered him to attend school regularly; however, he continues to be unlawfully absent. Unexcused absenteeism, or truancy, is associated with serious delinquency during adolescence and with considerably negative behavioral outcomes in adulthood.
Familial factors play a significant role in a child's truancy, as the problem is essentially personal in nature. Parents who turn a blind eye to absenteeism are particularly influential, since their inaction signals a lack of consequences for reckless conduct. Steve also demonstrates a lack of respect toward his teachers, and this strained relationship further reinforces his habit of skipping class. Personal factors contributing to his truancy include poor social skills and low self-worth, troubled peer relationships, deficient academic aptitude, poor concentration, and special educational needs. For successfully addressing Steve's truancy, the root causes must first be recognized and resolved.
Service Plan Development
Case planning is aimed at matching teenagers with suitable rehabilitative resources. Key considerations include the teen's criminal history and the nature of the current case. The Youth Assessment and Screening Instrument (YASI) is employed to collect data on the teen's background, legal history, peer and community relationships, school attendance, academic performance, physical and mental well-being, violent tendencies, and alcohol or drug use.
In this case, because Steve is purposefully choosing to remain absent from school, school authorities must intervene in a timely manner and motivate him to attend regularly in the future (Ross, 2012).
Coordination of Client to Appropriate Services
The widely recognized definition of case management provided by Solomon will guide service coordination in this youth and child care context. According to Solomon, case management refers to a coordinated approach for facilitating the availability of services to clients at the time, place, and duration that services are required. Solomon's model of service coordination is broader in scope and qualitatively different from conventional case management approaches.
Resource coordinators of the Adolescent Diversion Program (ADP) are members of the court, tasked with building working relationships with a variety of local service providers and with recommending and overseeing defendant compliance with assigned services. Low-risk teen cases may be resolved in the interests of justice at the first ADP court appearance (Ross, 2012).
References
National Association of Pretrial Services Agencies. (2008). Performance Standards and Goals for Pretrial Diversion/Intervention. Retrieved from Diversion Intervention Standards NAPSA 2008.pdf
Promising Practices in Pretrial Diversion. (2013, February 14). Retrieved September 18, 2015, from
Ross, R. J. (2012). The Adolescent Diversion Program in New York: A Reform in Progress. Retrieved September 18, 2015, from http://www.courtinnovation.org/sites/default/files/documents/ADP_FINAL.pdf
Truancy and Educational Neglect. (n.d.). Retrieved September 18, 2015, from http://childlaw.sc.edu/frmPublications/TruancyandEducationalNeglect.pdf
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.