US Crime Rates Compared to Other Developed Nations
This paper examines the United States crime problem in comparison to other industrialized nations, focusing on violent crime, homicide, and gun violence statistics. Drawing on FBI crime data, World Prison Brief figures, and peer-reviewed research, the paper demonstrates that the U.S. consistently outpaces comparable nations in rates of lethal violence and incarceration. The paper also addresses the argument that America has a "gun problem" rather than a broader crime problem, and ultimately rejects that distinction. A second major section explores why clear, comprehensive definitions of crime and criminal behavior are essential for political entities charged with enacting and revising criminal law.
- US Crime Rates in a Global Context: America leads developed nations in violent crime
- Gun Violence and the Gun Problem Argument: Rebutting the 'guns only' crime distinction
- Incarceration Rates and the Cost of Crime: Prison spending and population compared internationally
- Definitions of Crime and Their Importance to Lawmakers: Why crime definitions guide legislative action
- Debates Over Criminal Law and Punishment: Contested approaches to sentencing and punishment
- Conclusion: Clear definitions essential to solving crime
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Uses specific, verifiable statistics — such as firearm homicide rates per million and prison population figures — to ground comparative claims in concrete evidence.
- Engages directly with a counterargument (the "gun problem, not a crime problem" thesis) before refuting it, demonstrating basic argumentative structure.
- Connects empirical findings to a policy-relevant second section on legal definitions, showing awareness of the relationship between criminology and lawmaking.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates comparative analysis as an argumentative method. By positioning U.S. statistics (homicide rates, incarceration rates, prison spending) against figures from the Netherlands, Australia, and Switzerland, the author builds a case through contrast rather than assertion alone. This technique is reinforced by citation of FBI data and peer-reviewed sources, lending empirical weight to the comparative claims.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized into two broad argumentative sections. The first (approximately three paragraphs) establishes that the U.S. has a serious crime problem relative to peer nations, refutes the "guns only" counterargument, and uses incarceration data as additional evidence. The second section (approximately three paragraphs) pivots to a policy argument: that precise definitions of crime and criminal behavior are prerequisite to effective legislation, illustrated with examples such as juvenile mass shootings and sentencing debates.
US Crime Rates in a Global Context
The United States of America has a serious crime problem. When compared to other industrialized and advanced nations, America records the highest rates of violent crimes and property crimes. Violent crimes include murder and non-negligent manslaughter, robbery, rape, gang violence, and aggravated assault. Property crimes include larceny, burglary, arson, and motor vehicle theft. According to the 2019 Crime Statistics released by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), 2019 was the third consecutive year the number of violent crimes had decreased in the United States compared to previous years (The Federal Bureau of Investigation, October 1, 2020). However, when compared to other developed nations, the United States still leads the pack.
The United States has long recorded higher rates of violent death — especially homicide — than other developed nations. The rates of gun violence are much higher in the United States than in other industrialized and advanced nations (Grinshteyn & Hemenway, 2016). The primary reason behind this elevated gun violence is that there are far more guns in the United States and far fewer strong gun laws than in comparable nations (Grinshteyn & Hemenway, 2016).
Gun Violence and the Gun Problem Argument
Some argue that the United States does not have a crime problem — only a gun problem. The reasoning behind this argument is that, compared to other industrialized nations, the United States has roughly equivalent rates of property crime (Grinshteyn & Hemenway, 2016). The major difference lies in the rate of lethal violence, where the United States records significantly higher numbers (Przeszlowski & Crichlow, 2018). The homicide rate by firearm in the United States is estimated at 29.7 per million people — far higher than in other developed nations (Barnes, 2017). By comparison, Australia records 1.4 per million, the Netherlands 3.3, and Switzerland 7.7 (Przeszlowski & Crichlow, 2018). Supporters of this argument contend that stricter gun laws and fewer available firearms — as seen in other developed nations — would bring U.S. homicide rates down to levels comparable with those countries.
However, there is no basis for treating homicide as a separate category outside of the broader crime problem. Homicide is defined as a violent crime by the FBI, and analyzing it differently is precisely where this argument goes wrong. Violent crime of any type is still crime; it falls squarely within the legal and criminal definition of criminal activity, which is why people receive severe sentences for committing violent crimes. We cannot categorize crime selectively to fit a particular narrative. All criminal acts must be assessed consistently, without attempts to differentiate crimes merely to justify a predetermined conclusion.
Definitions of Crime and Their Importance to Lawmakers
Without proper definitions of crime and criminal behavior, it becomes difficult for politicians and members of Congress to enact laws aimed at controlling the crime problem. Laws in the United States are enacted by Congress, which is composed of political entities elected by citizens to represent their interests (Barnes, 2017). To create effective laws addressing criminal behavior, lawmakers must first understand what crime and criminal behavior actually mean. Based on their understanding of what constitutes criminal behavior, they can debate proposed measures before passing them into law. If definitions are not comprehensive, political entities will struggle to craft federal and state laws capable of curbing crime effectively.
Legal responses are what the American public relies upon to fight crime. Without first defining crime, it is impossible to debate it or to develop the best methods for reducing it (Barnes, 2017). Different individuals may hold different understandings of what constitutes a crime. For example, when a teenager shoots people at a school or in a mall, many people frame this as a mental health problem and resist calls for aggressive punishment. Yet, setting aside the offender's age, the act constitutes homicide — and the political entities responsible for legislating will rely heavily on how homicide is legally defined when creating laws to address it. If the definition of murder excludes or exempts teenagers, then that definition must be revisited. Before lawmakers can debate what works and what does not, they must first define the problem clearly.
Conclusion
Worrall (2015) posits that if we cannot define crime terms, debates about crime and the best methods for solving or reducing the problem are mere rhetoric. It is impossible to solve a problem that has not been defined and understood by all who are debating it. Moreover, there is no single solution to crime. We need to carefully differentiate the various types of crime — understanding what each category of criminal behavior encompasses — before we can begin designing effective responses. It is precisely for this reason that clear, comprehensive definitions of crime and criminal behavior are essential for the political entities responsible for addressing America's crime problem.
References
Barnes, N. (2017). Criminal politics: An integrated approach to the study of organized crime, politics, and violence. Perspectives on Politics, 15(4), 967–987.
Grinshteyn, E., & Hemenway, D. (2016). Violent death rates: The US compared with other high-income OECD countries, 2010. The American Journal of Medicine, 129(3), 266–273.
Przeszlowski, K. S., & Crichlow, V. J. (2018). An exploratory assessment of community-oriented policing implementation, social disorganization and crime in America. Social Sciences, 7(3), 35.
Schultze-Kraft, M., Chinchilla, F. A., & Moriconi, M. (2018). New perspectives on crime, violence and insecurity in Latin America. Crime, Law and Social Change, 69(4), 465–473.
Singal, J. (Feb. 8, 2021). America saw a historic rise in murders in 2020. Why? Intelligencer. Retrieved from https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/02/america-saw-a-historic-rise-in-murders-in-2020-why.html
The Federal Bureau of Investigation. (October 1, 2020). FBI releases 2019 crime statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.fbi.gov/services/cjis/cjis-link/fbi-releases-2019-crime-statistics
World Prison Brief. (2017a). Netherlands prison population. Retrieved from https://www.prisonstudies.org/country/netherlands
World Prison Brief. (2017b). United States of America prison population. Retrieved from https://www.prisonstudies.org/country/united-states-america
Worrall, J. L. (2015). Crime control in America: What works? (3rd ed.). London, United Kingdom: Pearson Education.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.