Why Suicide Rates Are Higher in Men: Causes and Prevention
This paper investigates why suicide rates are significantly higher in men than in women, using a multi-method approach that combines a systematic literature review with qualitative semi-structured interviews. Six peer-reviewed studies from Embase, Medline, and CINAHL are analyzed thematically, yielding four key themes: greater prevalence of suicide in men, social isolation and stress, elevated risk among older adult men (65+), and preference for violent suicide methods. These themes are then validated through interviews with seven men who previously attempted suicide. Findings reveal that masculinity norms, financial pressure, lack of social support, and reluctance to seek help are primary contributing factors. The paper concludes with recommendations for early detection of warning signs, psychosocial interventions, and strengthening social connectedness to prevent male suicide.
- Introduction and Background: Scope, global statistics, and neurobiological context
- Methodology and Search Strategy: Multi-method design, databases, eligibility criteria
- Systematic Literature Review: Six peer-reviewed studies summarized in table form
- Thematic Analysis of Key Findings: Four themes extracted from reviewed literature
- Qualitative Research and Interview Findings: Interview responses from seven suicide attempt survivors
- Discussion: Literature themes validated against interview data
- Conclusion and Recommendations: Prevention strategies and future research directions
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The multi-method design — pairing a systematic literature review with semi-structured interviews — gives the findings both breadth and depth, strengthening the validity of identified themes.
- The thematic analysis is tightly structured: each theme is named, supported by specific studies, and then re-examined against qualitative data, creating a clear chain of evidence.
- Interview responses are reported question-by-question with enough granular detail to illustrate individual variation while still allowing pattern recognition across participants.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates triangulation — using two independent data sources (published literature and primary interview data) to cross-validate the same set of themes. This technique strengthens credibility in qualitative research by showing that findings are not dependent on a single method or sample.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a formal research-report structure with eight numbered chapters: background, methodology, literature review (presented as a summary table), thematic analysis, qualitative research design, findings reported by interview question, discussion linking both data sources, and a conclusion with recommendations and future research directions. Appendices include the interview protocol and a note on data representation. This clear chapter-by-chapter organization makes it a useful model for undergraduate mixed-methods research writing.
Introduction and Background
Suicide can be considered a serious mental health crisis that requires intervention before tragedy occurs. It is imperative to recognize the warning signs in a person who is under stress or experiencing depression so that prompt help can be provided (Casarella, 2020). Family and friends are often the first to notice these signs, as the person frequently gives hints to those close to them before committing such an act. Globally, the suicide rate in men is approximately double that of women (Ritchie, Roser & Ortiz-Ospina, 2015). This paper aims to explore why this rate is higher in men, using a systematic literature review followed by a qualitative research analysis to validate the themes identified in the literature.
Statistics from 2017 revealed that the suicide rate for men was 3.5 times higher than that of women in the same year (Kennard, 2020). The demographic group most affected is middle-aged White men, who accounted for 70% of all male suicides; however, the risk is even greater among men of older ages. Reports have indicated that men tend to choose more lethal methods when attempting suicide, although women have been observed to have a greater rate of attempts overall.
The neurobiology underlying suicidal behavior involves a complex interplay of brain structures and alterations in brain functioning. Low concentrations of 5-HIAA (a serotonin metabolite) is one recognized factor, as depression and anxiety in men are associated with this neurochemical imbalance. Such conditions impose lasting effects on the family members and friends of men who die by suicide. It is most likely that men who attempt suicide experience a significantly diminished quality of life and feel unable to envision an alternative.
Methodology and Search Strategy
The research question guiding this study is: Why is suicide more prevalent in men?
A multi-method research design was employed. First, a systematic literature review was conducted, followed by qualitative research using semi-structured interviews. The themes identified from the literature were then assessed and compared with the qualitative research results. The literature review was conducted across three databases using predetermined exclusion and inclusion criteria to ensure rigor. A thematic analysis was subsequently conducted to identify recurring themes from prior studies, allowing for an evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of existing scholarship. The qualitative component consisted of semi-structured interviews with men who had previously attempted suicide, conducted to gain an in-depth understanding of their mental states and the motivations behind their attempts. The themes derived from the qualitative research were used to corroborate and reinforce the findings from the literature review.
For the systematic literature review, three databases were selected — Embase, Medline, and CINAHL — to identify peer-reviewed articles most relevant to the research question. The review was refined to six papers, enabling a systematic, rigorous, and wide-ranging critique of the evidence through thematic analysis. The thematic analysis extracted recurring themes from the texts, which were later used to inform the evaluation of the qualitative research. For the qualitative component, semi-structured interviews were conducted with men who had previously attempted suicide. The interviews took place in the presence of a psychiatric specialist in his clinical setting. The participants were his patients who had received counseling from the same doctor and had since recovered from acute symptoms. The results from the interviews were used to corroborate the themes identified in the systematic literature review and to provide additional supporting evidence for the paper's conclusions.
The following keywords were used to conduct the extensive literature search: suicide in men, high rate of suicide in men, men committing suicide, factors leading men to suicide, suicidality in men, male suicide, and male intentions for suicide.
Selected articles were considered eligible primarily because they were directly relevant to the research question — that is, they explored reasons for the high rate of suicide in men. Articles focused on female suicide or on family members affected by male suicidal behavior were excluded, as neither population was the focus of this study. Articles published before 2015 were also excluded so that only recent research would inform the analysis of contemporary factors contributing to male suicide. An additional search strategy involved examining the reference sections of selected articles to identify further relevant sources, opening new dimensions of inquiry. For example, this extended search illuminated the finding that men who suffer from depression frequently do not seek medical help.
Systematic Literature Review
More than 100 articles were identified when the keywords were entered into the databases; however, only six met the inclusion criteria and were selected for review. The systematic literature review is presented below in chronological order, providing a comprehensive overview of the scholarly research on male suicide.
Player et al. (2015) aimed to examine the factors contributing to suicide among at-risk men and the role of families in suicide prevention. One-to-one interviews and a focus group study revealed five major themes related to mood distortions in men and offered suggestions for how behavioral detection and care could improve prevention efforts.
Keohane & Richardson (2018) explored the role of masculinity in help-seeking behavior among men with depression and their willingness to provide psychological support to those at risk. A focus group study revealed three themes, suggesting that masculinity plays a dominant role in determining whether men seek and accept help in times of distress — a dynamic that can shape patterns of suicide prevention.
Conejero et al. (2018) investigated recent findings on suicidal ideation among adults and the risk factors that contribute to suicide attempts. A PubMed literature search concluded that stress, psychological distress, and social isolation are the primary causes of suicidal thoughts and should be targeted in prevention efforts.
Sargeant, Forsyth & Pitman (2018) examined suicide epidemiology among men in Greenland, drawing comparisons with other demographic groups in Denmark and Greenland. An extensive literature review found that Greenlandic men aged 15–24 had the highest prevalence of suicide, with young men more prone to suicide than women or any other male age group.
Kootbodien et al. (2020) scrutinized suicide death rates and trends in South Africa from 1997 to 2016. Death registration data showed that more men died by suicide than women, and that the average years of potential life lost (YPLL) were higher among men than women.
Rosso et al. (2020) evaluated the factors associated with violent suicide attempts, specifically among patients with bipolar disorder. Statistical results indicated that male gender was significantly associated with the use of violent methods in suicide attempts.
Conclusion and Recommendations
After the thematic analysis of the systematic literature review and a thorough qualitative analysis involving semi-structured interviews with seven men who had previously attempted suicide — conducted under the supervision of a psychiatric specialist — it is evident that the themes from the literature and the findings from the interviews are mutually reinforcing.
The first theme concerned the predominance of suicide in men over women, with young men aged 10–35 being the most at-risk group. This was reflected in the interview sample, in which five of seven participants fell within this age bracket. Another theme was the use of violent methods. The literature review found that men frequently employ methods such as self-inflicted cutting, jumping from heights, or hanging. Three of the seven young adult participants confirmed the use of lethal methods in their attempts, consistent with this finding.
Social isolation was identified as one of the most significant contributors to suicidal ideation and attempts among men. Because men do not want to appear fragile, they suppress their feelings and gradually withdraw socially as mood disturbances and anxiety increase. While two of the married respondents did share their concerns with their wives, the other five did not seek any outlet. Had these men been able to consistently confide in someone they trusted, they may have been able to avoid the progression toward social isolation and, ultimately, suicide.
Closely related to social isolation is masculinity, which functions as a structural barrier to help-seeking. Men who equate emotional expression with weakness, and who fear social stigma at work or among peers if their mental health struggles become known, become increasingly restricted in their emotional lives. Stress accumulates silently until it erupts in the form of a suicide attempt that leaves those around them completely unprepared.
Older adult men — generally those aged 65 and above — constitute another high-risk group. The presence of two older adults in this sample, both struggling with chronic illness and social disconnection, underscored the particular vulnerability of this population. Prior research further confirms that men without spouses are at elevated risk of social isolation and subsequent suicide attempts, as bereavement and social exclusion are strongly associated with suicidal ideation in older adults.
Based on these findings, the following recommendations are offered. Early detection of warning signs by those closest to at-risk men — parents, siblings, friends, or spouses — is essential. Behavioral changes such as mood alterations and increasing social withdrawal should be monitored consistently so that further deterioration can be prevented.
Mood regulation techniques and psychosocial therapies are effective tools for preventing the psychological disorders that frequently precede suicidal behavior. Psychological professionals can teach men coping strategies and emotional regulation skills. Healthcare and nursing professionals should recognize that family members and friends are crucial allies in the intervention process. Demonstrating compassion, offering consistent attention, and providing emotional care can help men re-engage with life and gradually open up about their difficulties. Social reintegration — staying active and maintaining relationships with at-risk men — can help preserve their self-esteem during periods of financial hardship, bereavement, or unemployment. Attention to physical health, including a balanced diet, regular exercise, and reduction in smoking or alcohol use, also supports mood regulation.
Future research should further investigate the protective role of social connectedness — particularly having a trusted confidant — as a life-saving factor in male suicide prevention. The inability to share one's emotional burden was one of the most consistent explanations for escalating stress and eventual suicide attempts among the participants in this study. Men of all ages should be encouraged to form and maintain meaningful relationships in which they feel safe expressing their difficulties. Particular attention should be paid to helping older men develop new social connections and active communication channels with family and friends. Diverting men away from social remoteness by fostering these connections may be among the most effective strategies for reducing the disproportionately high rate of suicide in men.
Casarella, J. (2020, March 11). Recognizing suicidal behavior. WebMD. https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/recognizing-suicidal-behavior
Conejero, I., Olie, E., Courtet, P., & Calati, R. (2018). Suicide in older adults: Current perspectives. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 13, 691–699. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S130670
Elbogen, E. B., Lanier, M., Montgomery, A. E., Strickland, S., Wagner, H. R., & Tsai, J. (2020). Financial strain and suicide attempts in a nationally representative sample of US adults. American Journal of Epidemiology, 189(11), 1266–1274.
Hannah, R., Roser, M., & Ortiz-Ospina, E. (2015). Suicide. Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/suicide
Kennard, J. (2020, December 10). Understanding suicide among men. Very Well Mind.
Keohane, A., & Richardson, N. (2018). Negotiating gender norms to support men in psychological distress. American Journal of Men's Health, 12(1), 160–171.
Kiosses, D. N., Szanto, K., & Alexopoulos, G. S. (2015). Suicide in older adults: The role of emotions and cognition. Current Psychiatry Reports, 16(11), 495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-014-0495-3
Kootbodien, T., Naicker, N., Wilson, K. S., Ramesar, R., & London, L. (2020). Trends in suicide mortality in South Africa, 1997 to 2016. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(6), 1850.
McKenzie, S. K., Collings, S., Jenkin, G., & River, J. (2018). Masculinity, social connectedness and mental health: Men's diverse patterns of practice. American Journal of Men's Health, 12(5), 1247–1261.
Player, M. J., Proudfoot, J., Fogarty, A., Whittle, E., Spurrier, M., Shand, F., Christensen, H., Hadzi-Pavlovic, D., & Wilhelm, K. (2015). What interrupts suicide attempts in men: A qualitative study. PLoS One, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128180
Pompili, M., Serafini, G., Innamorati, M., Dominici, G., Ferracuti, S., Kotzalidis, G. D., Serra, G., Girardi, P., Janiri, L., Tatarelli, R., Sher, L., & Lester, D. (2010). Suicidal behavior and alcohol abuse. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7(4), 1392–1431.
Poorolajal, J., & Darvinski, N. (2016). Smoking and suicide: A meta-analysis. PLoS One, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156348
Rosso, G., Albert, U., Bramante, S., Aragno, E., Quarato, F., Di Salvo, G., & Maina, G. (2020). Correlates of violent suicide attempts in patients with bipolar disorder. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.152136
Sargeant, H., Forsyth, R., & Pitman, A. (2018). The epidemiology of suicide in young men in Greenland: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(11), 2442.
Smith, A. R., Witte, T. K., Teale, N. E., King, S. L., Bender, T. W., & Joiner, T. E. (2009). Revisiting impulsivity in suicide. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 26(6), 779–797.
Wiklander, M. (2012). Attempted suicide and shame. Karolinska Institute.
Question 1: Was your suicide attempt an act of impulsivity, or was it planned?
Question 2: If it was planned, what led you to have suicidal thoughts?
Question 3: What methods or ways did you choose?
Question 4: What imposed suicidal thoughts? That is, what circumstances were you going through, and how did they make you feel?
Question 5: Did you seek any help when you first sensed that something was wrong?
Question 6: Who did you reach out to, and did they help?
Question 7: If you did not seek help, what prevented you from doing so?
Question 8: Did you seek solace in other ways when you were mentally distressed — such as smoking, alcohol, or substance abuse?
Question 9: Looking back, do you feel the attempt was justified, or could you have adopted other ways to manage your stressors?
Note: Questions 1, 2, and 9 are not graphically represented, as all respondents provided the same responses to these questions.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.