Women in Law Enforcement: Barriers, History, and Progress
This paper examines the role of women in law enforcement from historical origins through the present day. Beginning with the 1972 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission legislation as a turning point, the paper reviews scholarly literature on recruitment, retention, job satisfaction, and organizational culture as they relate to female officers. It traces the evolution of women's roles from "police matron" to patrol officer and police chief, highlights landmark firsts such as Penny Harrington and Beverly J. Harvard, and addresses ongoing barriers including sexual harassment, limited mentoring programs, and dual racial and gender discrimination. The paper concludes that community policing models and inclusive organizational cultures offer the most promising path toward gender parity in law enforcement.
- Introduction: Statistics and policy context for women in policing
- Literature Review: Research on recruitment, retention, and job satisfaction
- History of Women in Law Enforcement: From police matrons to first female chiefs
- Women Currently in Law Enforcement: Ongoing structural barriers and collaborative policing models
- Conclusion: Community policing and inclusive culture as solutions
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Synthesizes multiple peer-reviewed sources to build a coherent narrative about women in policing, rather than relying on a single study.
- Moves logically from historical context to present-day challenges, giving the argument a clear developmental arc.
- Grounds abstract claims about organizational culture in concrete evidence, such as camaraderie reducing the effects of sexual harassment and women's preference for community policing models.
- Acknowledges intersectionality by noting that African-American female officers face compounded discrimination based on both race and gender.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of a literature review as scaffolding for argument. Rather than simply summarizing individual studies, the author weaves findings from Lonsway (2006), Harrison (2012), Harrington (2002), and Horne (2006) into thematic clusters — recruitment vs. retention, organizational culture, camaraderie — that progressively build the case for reform. This technique shows readers how separate studies collectively point toward the same policy conclusions.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a statistical overview and policy context, followed by a dedicated literature review section that introduces thematic findings. A historical section then traces women's roles from "police matron" to chief of police. A contemporary section identifies structural barriers that persist today, and a conclusion synthesizes practical recommendations — particularly around community policing and inclusive organizational culture — drawn from the preceding evidence.
Introduction
Women have not played a significant role in law enforcement until recently, and especially since the 1972 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission legislation. Law enforcement continues to be a male-dominated profession, although women are becoming increasingly visible at multiple levels of the profession. Estimated representation of women in law enforcement ranges from 2 to 15%, depending on the jurisdiction and department, the rank or role, and the year of the survey (Blackstock, 2015; Horne, 2006; Price, 1996). Although women remain underrepresented in law enforcement, attitudes and norms may be changing significantly to encourage more women to achieve positions of power. Interestingly, African-American women comprise thirty percent of all female-held law enforcement positions; in contrast, African-American men comprise fifteen percent of all male-held law enforcement positions.
Literature Review
A review of the literature reveals what barriers women have encountered in law enforcement — from the time of job consideration and recruitment, through job satisfaction and role fulfillment, to the time of career end and retirement. Lonsway (2006) found that more women than men consider quitting a career in law enforcement during training, but men consider quitting more often once they are already serving on the force. Furthermore, the problems associated with females in law enforcement are related to retention more than to recruitment (Lonsway, 2006). Many women are drawn to the profession for personal and pragmatic reasons. For example, women indicate that secure employment with good pay and "excellent" benefits, as well as a "clear path for career advancement," were the primary motivations for joining the force in the first place (Harrington, 2002, p. 226).
Organizational structure and culture present the most notable barriers for women in law enforcement. Even small things like ill-fitting equipment and uniforms reflect the lack of consideration given to diverse personnel. Organizational culture can have a pervasive impact on job satisfaction for women on the force. Many women report feeling a strong sense of job security, leading to high self-esteem and high job satisfaction (Harrington, 2002; Lonsway, 2006). However, more women than men report feelings of anxiety related to work (Lonsway, 2006). Women tend to be satisfied with their employment status, the nature of their work and assignments, and their role in the organization (Lonsway, 2006). This is particularly true for women working in community policing organizations, a model that more women than men tend to support (Lonsway, 2006).
A potent factor related to job retention is the development of camaraderie among female officers, which can mitigate organizational culture barriers like sexual harassment (Harrington, 2002; Harrison, 2012). Harrison (2012) applies social bond theory to job satisfaction among women in law enforcement, showing that women use their connections with female colleagues to mitigate the ill effects of minor sexual harassment and other organizational culture issues that would otherwise become barriers. However, most women in law enforcement stress the need for greater departmental and colleague support in their endeavor to achieve gender parity (Harrison, 2012).
History of Women in Law Enforcement
Women were once employed in a role dubbed "matron" (National Center for Women and Policing, n.d.; Flanagan, n.d.). In addition to performing custodial duties in prisons, women working in law enforcement organizations as matrons were assigned to cases involving female and juvenile offenders (Horne, 2006). Prior to women's suffrage, and especially before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, police matrons did not have the power to make arrests. In 1893, however, the mayor authorized the Chicago Police Department to hire Marie Owens, the widow of an officer killed in the line of duty. Owens was offered arrest powers and served as a patrolman — one of the first females ever to hold such a position. Her career with the Chicago Police Department lasted thirty years. The first women to have been officially sworn in as police officers included Lola Baldwin in 1905 in Portland, Oregon, and Alice Stebbin Wells in 1910 in Los Angeles (National Center for Women and Policing, n.d.). Baldwin held the power of arrest and served for fourteen years. The use of women in law enforcement remained largely an interface between social work and police duties, focused on helping female offenders and juveniles. Women were considered the custodians of moral values and behaviors (Horne, 2006).
Just as law enforcement can be considered a gendered profession due to its overwhelmingly male composition, some crimes are also considered gendered — including rape and prostitution (Rich & Seffrin, 2014). Women in law enforcement prior to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission frequently dealt with these gendered crimes to provide necessary insight and support services. Since the 1972 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, women's role in law enforcement became more gender neutral. Even before that legislation, women were being integrated more fully into the police force. The International Association of Women Police was founded, facilitating women's access to patrol positions, and many served (National Center for Women and Policing, n.d.).
Women's roles in policing shifted from that of social worker to that of law enforcement officer over the next several generations. The percentage of women serving in law enforcement doubled after the passage of the Equal Employment Opportunity Act, which ensured non-discrimination at all levels of human resources, including promotions to police chief. The first female chief of police was Penny Harrington in Portland, Oregon, in 1985, and the first African-American female chief of police was Beverly J. Harvard in Atlanta in 1994 (National Center for Women and Policing, n.d.). Race and gender frequently collide in the world of policing, with many African-American female officers reporting dual discrimination based on both race and gender (Price, 1996).
Conclusion
Encouraging more women to participate in law enforcement may have a net positive outcome for communities. Although women have made strides in law enforcement careers, significant barriers to gender parity remain. Flanagan (n.d.) reports common experiences with biased views of women during training, based on perceived physical and emotional weaknesses. As Blackstock (2015) and Flanagan (n.d.) point out, women receive the same rigorous training as their male counterparts, meaning that female officers are well prepared to meet the dangers and challenges of patrol work. In addition to relying on training and skills maintenance, all officers should work together as a team in crisis situations.
Sexual harassment and an intimidating organizational culture can also hinder the success of women in law enforcement. However, experiences of sexual harassment vary, and some officers experience none (Blackstock, 2015). Discrimination is an unfortunate reality on the force, particularly for women of color who may experience racism and sexism simultaneously. Community policing and other collaborative models can help law enforcement agencies shift toward a more responsive force that recognizes the needs of women both within the department and in the broader community. By improving organizational culture so that the "old boys' club" mentality gives way to an inclusive environment, female chief officers can establish leadership standards that future women can follow.
References
Blackstock, H. (2015). Interview.
Flanagan, D. (n.d.). Women in policing. PB&J, 1(1). Retrieved from
Harrington, P. E. (2002). Advice to women beginning a career in policing. Women & Criminal Justice, 14(1), 1–13.
Harrison, J. (2012). Women in law enforcement. Women and Criminal Justice, 22(3), 226–238.
Horne, P. (2006). Policewomen: Their first century and the new era. The Police Chief. Retrieved from
Lonsway, K. A. (2006). Are we there yet? The progress of women in one large law enforcement agency. Women & Criminal Justice, 18(1/2), 1–48. doi:10.1300/J012v18n01_01
Miller, S. L. (1998). Rocking the rank and file. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 14(2), 156–172.
National Center for Women and Policing (n.d.). History of women in policing. Retrieved from http://womenandpolicing.com/history/historytext.htm
Price, B. R. (1996). Female police officers in the United States. National Institute of Justice/National Criminal Justice Reference Service. Retrieved from
Rich, K., & Seffrin, P. (2014). Birds of a feather or fish out of water? Feminist Criminology, 9(2), 137–159.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.